Tracking the deception Cabal Of "pull it" Thugs who orchestrated the September 11th attacks.
____
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” [Who will guard the guards?] Juvenal, Rome, (60-140AD)
The terrorists thought that we were all celebrating April Fools Day on 9-11. Yes maybe some fools did exist. Yes, a group of Christians who love tall tales such as this one: that two planes [which were no where near by] struck two buildings and caused explosions. Then the buildings stood erect for over an hour then suddenly exploded again with raging fires; and then fell to the ground into pure dust. This tale seems to be a sad joke yet people believe it.
There has never been so much evidence to convict the disciples, as we saw in 9-11; yet we allowed the ruthless terrorists to tell us that Arab patsies committed the crime; without showing us the facts..
It's time for solving 9-11 but firstly the plain facts:The SWAMP did not carry out the attack but several wayward opportunists within, and useful idiots did.
We now have to retrieve the trillions they stole from taxpayers.
Firstly the terrorists weren't elementary school A-rabs from caves in Afghanistan, the terrorists are the masters of major crimes in history They have majored in deception for decades. .
We cannot file suit against the SWAMP because the federal judges will not entertain such. The keys to solving 9-11 are (1) CGI grahpics expert summary and (2) a Qui Tam lawsuit against the headquarters of the terrorist group which is based overseas. Frankly the SWAMP likes suits against it because the plaintiff will get nowhere.
Where we go now?
First the qui tam suit, then the terrorists' collaborators can be witnesses. Why the collaborators?
They colluded: (1) to delay the investigations into the nation's worst crime [411 days] (2) they appointed a conflict of interest dimwitted motley crew to investigate,instead of the FBI (3) they allowed a disciple of the terrorists to steer the motley crew (4) they used the military to conduct themselves in a manner which they would not have done ordinarily such as the FUBAR, antics and slaughter in Afghanistan and Iraq. The cartoon physics shown on TV would have been detected by a legally appointed investigative agency.
The motley crew or more appropriately the Warren Commission II could have used basic common sense to figure out that a plane could not have cut down major steel columns as portrayed by the cartoon physics of the day. Or, were they paid to ignore the facts? But hear this! A little digging reveal that disciples were at the payout end of the 911 deal.
We need a true patriot to stand up and file the right suit against the terrorists and the Commission..
It is sad how the sheeple stand by and watch the deception terrorists forment plot after plot to benefit themselves from fake history and escaping with a clean break every time.
On the Trail of the terrorists.
The compositraitors desended on Ace Baker like a ton of bricks for his wonderful work on crappy video compositing. Hold strong Ace. We get the gist of the hoax.
Question: What about a friend who is so ruthless and cunning that he has a policy directed at harming you?
9-11 was a simple game orchestrated by our fidus Achates [barabas] through a series of deceptive tactics conducted by thugs, bombers, opportunists and useful idiots. The SWAMP as an entity did not orchestrate 9-11 but criminal elements within the said SWAMP did play key roles in carrying out the attacks and covering it up afterwards.
The said SWAMP tried to tell graduates the tall tale of 911, when they should have told the lie to savages only.
Our ruthless and cunning amigo along with several disciples from the "synagogue of the devil" carried out the plot with bombings and video compositing (CGI). Absolutely no plane was hijacked by any Arab on 9-11. It was clever 'bombing work' by the disciples whose work is not highlighted by the SWAMP because of the secrets they have for the said SWAMP.
You think aliens, Saddam Hussein, North Korea and Iran are our problems, well think again, corrupt and worthless American criminals are our problems. Therefore corrupt American criminals are the ones to keep an-eye-on.
The SWAMP should have been cleaned out, not re-stocked. Talking about our best friend! That talk is stupidity or criminality? Had the senior terrorists conducted a quick investigation and did not oppose the idea that the buildings were bombed, the people would not know that they are the terrorists masterminds. Question: When we going to stop living the lies off the A-rabs?
Have you heard of stairway B? When the next chapter of the synagogue is written the following sentence will be present: " And we were at the end of our rope when the savior stretched forth his hand and caught us. He cuddled and delivered us to safety." Whilimena
Remember the JFK scam was done by the religonists.
Oswald was not shot by Ruby. He was killed in the car and burried in a steel cased mold.
Then Ruby who had that secret, was injected with cancer virus by the medical witch from the conspiracy,
Uncle Henry Kesinger said:" Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." They did not have airplanes to intercept on 9-11 because there were no hijacked planes, but the military did not tell us, they played the dumb role.
On the Trail of the terrorists. SPECIAL COMMENT: One disciple asked:" Whats wrong with the plane's wing behind the building?" Folks, the flight 175 was no where near that tower on 911. Secondly disciples are trying to release their criminal friends from the QUAGMIRE THEY'RE IN. Firstly within hours after the attack, the senior deception terrorists were parading around identifying bin Laden as the suspect. But hear this folks after 17 years, the world's premiere investigation agency has not stated that bin Laden was responsible. Plain and simple, such a video is pure cartoon physics - a blatant fraud.
911 sad comedy
The rascals of 911 used some of the most sophisticated weapons but they made some .errors:
The alleged Flight 175 engine was not from that plane, nor was it used by the airline.
The alleged planes entering the WTC buildings were pure cartoon graphics.-
The alleged Flight 77 crash obliterated all its components yet the DUMB FOOLS were able to identify by DNA all the passengers, except the Arabs.
The hole which the alleged plane dug in Shanksville, was already there since 1994
The alleged 4 hijacked planes were in the air for about two hours yet the 60 billion military industry did not intercept one of them, prompting the world to laugh at the incompetence of the US; you see, NORAD knew that there were no hijacked planes.
Although the chain-of-command went AWOL during that emergency, no one was punished.
The rascals manipulated forensic evidence in New York, Pentagon and Shanksville. Why?
The alleged Arab hijackers were not listed on the airline manifests, moreover 9 of them are alive. How come the hijackers all crashed and perished on 911 yet 9 are still alive?
The NTSB stated that some of the four hijacked planes did not fly on 911. Where did the officials gather the farce about the planes being hijacked?
The Military chief, while speaking to the savages, said that the war games, { setupto confuse the FAA} assisted in the process What process?
Why didn’t the officials cancel war games at that critical time?
The officials called in only the family members to go and listen to LETS Roll. There was no information from the '911 treasure trove', then how the officials knew how many 'terrorists' were on each plane? One of our major problems is the number of savages among us who believe anything: "I saw it on TV". The 911 terrorists told us that Flight 93 went into the ground and left 50% of its body exposed; but while they had no photo to show, they provided an artist's depiction of an airplane in the ground. That picture was to fool the savages into believing that flight 93 was the depiction.
One individual spotted one 911 plane (by tail number) in use, in 2003 even though the officials said that it was obliterated in 2001.
Junior and his goons enacted a bill to compensate the airlines for loss. Was it ‘loss’ or something else, and also to keep participants quiet about the farce?
Do we see the unidentified agents who were involved in the 911 conspiracy?
The Arab hijacking tale was as phony as a seven dollar bill and if we allow the terrorists to continue using Muslims as bogeymen we will be very, very, sorry one day.
On the Trail of the terrorists.
We now know that the thugs who aspire and conspire to conduct mayhem to gain easy wealth, hang around the SWAMP to lure a swampee into a mentality of corruption.
Many of these criminals believe in using the SWAMP for gaining power and riches. Therefore the chief executive must have his head securely screwed on in order to stay ahead of the game. If he is good he becomes a target and if he is bad they will get him anyway.
Imagine Chief Junior first selected Uncle Henry as Commission master of cover up but the Jersey Girls placed a plug in that pick. However, he, Junior did find a contra figure to lead the Commission.
Whilimena
A true American should keep his integrity close to his chest at all times because that is all one has.
The world looks upon America for leadership and so we should show leadership qualities at ALL times; even to the Iraqis, Iranians and North Koreans.
TheSatanists did it, 100 % proof
The Satanists did it, 100 % proof
This assessment of careful research concludes that the Satanists orchestrated September 11 - without conjecture,100 percent proof. However, one has to remember that one must be careful when discussing the 911 caper with mortals.
There is is the limitation of some peoples’ brains to absorb the 911 concept of the high energy science used on 911, because they have been nurtured by Langley over decades to consider any skeptic as a conspiracy theorist - a nut. Then we have the Straw men and those suffering from serious doses of cognitive dissonance; then the 911 criminals who target the theorists with the data which can send 911 thugs to jail.
The SWAMP is no friend of the Satanists even though they say so , in fact the SWAMP is afraid of the Satanists because of past occurrences like the JFK , Pearl Harbor and most important, the Paper Clip thing. The terrorists planted agents among the presstitutes, who immediately began to tell the public who did the acts, excluding themselves.
One top brass disciple who worked at the Port Authority handed the New York buildings to his fellow disciple already at the complex. The fact was that the buildings were slated for demolition because of the alleged enormous amounts of asbestos in them. But actually there were just 40 stories of asbestos really The only problem was how to demolish 100 story buildings which were located in a city.
Several thugs heard about the full scale 911 scam and they decided to cash in, such as the put options and stolen gold heists. Terrorists thugs were on television identifying the Islamists as the perpetrators. Think further about operators of the Brady bonds and the hammer fund. The deceptive terrorists set up a group of criminal financial wizards to meltdown the financial sector, and swallow up the funds which ran into trillions.
The SWAMP did not fully participate but certain thugs within and useful-idiot-elements did. For example, that man who keeps grinding his teeth like a horse; and the idiot Poppy Junior. MASTER PLAN
The Satanists had the 911 scam colligated down to the “T” so that it did not fail. They installed a management team to supervise all facets of the operation. For example, three disciples to take control of the WTC, one disciple working with the idiot commander-in-chief [Junior] to tell him to stand down and steer him into AWOL corner during an extreme emergency, one disciple at the Pentagon, this one made a haul of 3.3 trillion between 2001 and 2004; one at NORAD and one at the war games center; other disciples manning the financial decapitation swindle. Other key disciples placed at key points as follows: The ordnance E Team placed in the towers to reside, cut iron and plant bombs; a plot called the B-thing; and also to disfigure sections of the building to show that planes struck. They even created a book dipicting their antics, imagine that. The terrorists did not intend to run around picking up pieces of gold after the blast; they cohooted with disciples in insurance companies to rig policies for maximum payoff.
One disciple at the Justice Department to ensure that none of the terrorists was thoroughly checked and that those who fell in harms way were immediately shipped back home to the synagogue; the SHOE and panty bomber type disciples at airport security to control boarding information and to say, if needed, “Yes! it was the fellow Osama and the terrorists because we saw some A-rabs pass through here.”
POST 911 coverup masters
The Naudet Brothers were on contract to prepare the cartoon graphics. One team at the AAA to institute mass air traffic confusion. One disciple placed at the Warren Commission II to steer it done silly lane; one was Grand master of the 7 billion dollar handout fund, who stated that he would dispense the loot as he saw it fit. Anyone who dared to enter his office talking about complaint was told to “scram’; and yet another was grand 911 judge who had the authority to give a conspirator a huge sum, and chase any complainer like Helen Mariani out of his office.
Forensic evidence The 911 scammers left so many fingerprints at the scene, Ray Charles could find them.
Forensic evidence is what open prison doors on many occasions therefore the synagogue planted a disciple to remove that evidence from the New York rubble. The act itself was a major crime. The political disciple came in handy to push through the multi billion dollar payments. Finally a disciple was installed at the AG to lock the GATE ON ANY person who dare to file a complaint.
One disciple arranged with another to send anthrax to the SWAMP, then he notified some SWAMPERS to begin taking ciprofloxacin immediately. This attack was to force the SWAMP to enact repressive legislation on the American people.
The anthrax did not kill anyone but the supplier disciple killed himself because he would not stoop to the repressive legislation.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PASSENGERS? Correct question but there is no imbroglio here. What passengers? We need to know how the alleged passengers were selected. There were no regular passengers, because 911 was deception all the way. The terrorists did not have a fool-proof plan but they were subtle enough to place a certain group on a plane and shot it down. Persons may have bought tickets based on forged identification made by the synagogue but they knew that they would not fly on 911. In fact some of the phantom airplanes did not fly on that date, (according to the NTSB and there is absolutely no crash evidence on the sites. The airlines were complicit by not divulging certain official lies that day. A few goyims did follow foolish advice from the Team and subsequently died mysteriously in the Flight 93 and 77 mystery. Why do you think a group of jet fighters went out to sea? To shoot down the plane with the ‘terrorists’ The grieving husbands, and wives like the Jersey Girls, wept, but imagine those whose loved or hated ones were safe at home awaiting the time to collect the free 1.8 million dollars.They secured 1.8 million dollars each for their participation in the scam only because they were disciples. Imagine how they jumped for joy yelling:” America, the land for scams”.
Most importantly, no A-rab hijacked any plane on 911. That is the reason, as smart as the Satanists think they are, they could not provide airline manifests with Arabic names. The Satanists did prepare a list of A-rabs for the SWAMP but it was faked. Several of the “dead” hijackers were found alive post 911. 911 was a another scam on Islam, the patsy society.
“WE SAW PLANES CRASH”
No one except the ever-ready disciples spoke about planes. Not one A-rab hijacked any plane on 911 believe it or not. The deception included crappy video compositing [CGI] whereby the disciples inserted planes into videos taken of the sites’ - the videos were plain examples of cartoon physics.
Insurance fraud!
Which group of assessors chose to pay for incidents in the 911 scam? They were fellow terrorists, synagogue disciples, useful idiots and plain dummies?
Presstitutes role
What role did the Presstitutes play? As usual, to fool the public with the cartoon physics and enhance the case for the New York insurance fraud. Still do not believe the no plane deception? One reporter called from scene of WTC: "I just saw another explosion." Walla In studio!:" It was a second plane." Reporter on scene not disturbed by any deafening 767 noise; "I did not see any airplane." Presstitute displaying TV screen with graphics: "Yes, another plane just hit." No normal mortal saw or heard any plane that morning. The people you heard screaming about planes were disciples of the terrorists playing their role in the 911 deception scam. The only people the terrorists fooled were the savages.
CUI BONO!!!
The Satanists benefited almost 100 percent. From the Pentagon [3.3 trillion], the put options, the HAMMER fund, silverstream scam, New York billion dollar insurance fraud, 7 billion dollar 911 handout fund, 911 misvestigation, and the war.on.terror scam.
Idiocy abound. The boss man said 19 Arab hijackers were involved but people narrowed that amount by identifying 9 of the 19 who were still alive. Common sense question: What then is the validity of the official story?
Why the simple simons assisted the synagogue in that manner?
The synagogue has a load of secrets for the SWAMP, secrets that could land swampees in jail for dozens of years; plus the said SWAMPEES believe that a god instructs them to do what they do;therefore periodically, the synagogue asks: “Why don’t you do something for me?”
The Swampees readily consent so long as no member of their family will die in the caper. And guess what folks, the synagogue knows that holding all that secret will make them untouchable for life; that is of course if we do not drain-the-SWAMP and severely punish the culprits.
You may ask why the military does not knock down the synagogue and retrieve the secrets from the vault. The synagogue does not maintain all its files in vault 7 like Sadaam, it stores its secrets differently from us, it places its secrets all over the world in the cardboard boxes of the ever-ready disciples. The task to obliterate was contemplated but who knows where those cardboard boxes are located?
The debunkers
Intelligent debunkers provide intelligent responses, but a few foreign nuts who thought they could setup a programs to acquire US visas and financial aid, offered to agree with every portion of the official story. Their stupidity boggled the minds of Scholars for 911 Truth and other skeptics.
The SWAMP takes the populace for fools, but that is wrong The flight 175 engine did not belong to flight 175 or the airline. The flight 93 hole in which it allegedly disappeared, was there since 1994, according to the geological survey map The small white plane people saw in shanksville was cruise missile and the planes they saw diving into buildings were cgi..
CARTOON PHYSICS The SWAMP HAS TO BE WATCHFUL of the criminals in the midst which endorses certain kinds of harebrained schemes like the 911 cartoon physics: (1) The airplane videos were faked (2) Flight 93 allegedly went 20 feet into the soil although a plane cannot withstand an impact with water. Moreover the trench at Shanksville was there since 1994. At Pentagon videos did not show impact of a plane. At WTC the E.Team dug holes so that they appear as though plane wings did. Imagine plane wings cutting iron This act was a lie worst than joshua and the horn men.
Flight 77 gassed
This flight was not scheduled to fly on 911 and so no Arab hijacked it. The alleged passengers were lured into a hanger or some area where they were gassed. The phone calls were morphed. Consider a man calling and claiming that he was Mark Bingham. "Hello mom, this is Mark Bingham." Have you ever called your mom and told her your full name? The caller was not MARK!!! Imagine stewardess calling telling the authorities that they were on planes. Where would we think they were, on boats?
The dumb fools (according to Uncle Henry) had the people in places like in the sea where they could positively conduct DNA identification of the remains. The Sinagogue placed disciples, already at the SWAMP, to research laws months prior 911 so that the Patriot Act could be enacted so soon after 911. One disciple threatened law makers with anthrax. DEBUNKERS (1): There are some Belleview escapees and terrorists' henchmen trying to claim that respectable theorists like Dr. Wood and Chris Bollyn are fakes. These debunking fools are just trying to confuse the savages and anger civilized men. We must ignore debunkers based on two simple facts: the NTSB already said that some of the planes did not fly on 911 and about 9 of the alleged terrorists are alive and well.
MIRACLE AT WTC The SWAMP has dumped trillions of our dollars on the Satanists which they use to research and develop advanced weapons and trojan software. Those weapons were used in 911. Had the 911 incident occurred in the days when Guttenberg and Hutter were printing the bible this account would certainly appear in it: "And behold the Lord had sympathy on his people by miraculously stretching out his hands and securing 14 of us out of harms way into stairwell B where we miraculously escaped harm."
Folks, the 14 men who were in stairwell B were in no danger because only dust fell on them. Actually had this been during less sophisticated times we would hear that god did 911. The satanists terrorists colluded with their disciples at the SWAMP to create legislations which authorized hundreds of millions to the terrosists 'bank accounts.
911 sad comedy
The rascals of 911 used some of the most sophisticated weapons but they made some .errors:
The alleged Flight 175 engine was not from that plane, nor was it used by the airline.
The alleged planes entering the WTC buildings were pure cartoon graphics.-
The alleged Flight 77 crash obliterated all its components yet the DUMB FOOLS were able to identify by DNA all the passengers, except bodies of the Arabs.
The hole which the alleged plane dug in Shanksville, was already there since 1994 Planes allegedly crashed beyond any recognition, yet alleged hyjacker's passport and bandana found intact.
Planes on ground yet callers pretend to be at cruising speed: Cee Cee: "I am on a plane...I am calling from the plane..." Where did she think the listener would believe she was calling from? A submarine may be? Conclusion. Her handler was close by.
Presstitute mastery and mystery and trickery:
The source which control the Press will always control the world.
Not one pilot radioed ground to confirm any hijacking. Where did we originally get the hijacking fallacy?
The lets -roll tape of the cabin which they made available to the savages was recorded, In the cockpit, walla!
What happened to the recording on the flight 93 tape how come we did not hear it?
In the flight 93 scam the plane allegedly sunk 20 feet into the ground and the red bandana and recorder rolled to surface.
Oh Mcgillycuddy, Imagine they did another CGI to show flight 93 crashing.
Junior said that he saw first plane crashing at WTC when the CGI video was shown a day later, was that ‘saw’ a direct DIA action or just a lie?
The Compositing traitors forget to do CGI’s for the Pentagon and Shanksville and tell the public it was reality Reason, CGI was to benefit the insurance fraud in New York. In the other areas the loose public purse would surfeit.
The BBC tried a stunt like in JFK, their Jane was on air telling people that WTC 7 collapsed while it was still firmly in place. This was done because the terrorists told reporters earlier that the tower would fall.
The alleged 4 hijacked planes were in the air for about two hours yet the 60 billion military industry did not intercept one of them, prompting the world to laugh at the 'incompetence' of the US.
Although the chain-of-command went AWOL during that emergency, no one was punished. Someone tried a stunt by placing a piece of landing gear beside a Muslim building. Funny thing was that one could see clearly that it was lowered by a rope and not fallen from a plane like they wanted the public to believe.
The rascals manipulated forensic evidence in New York, Pentagon and Shanksville. Why?
The alleged Arab hijackers were not listed on the airline manifests, moreover 9 of them are alive. How come the hijackers all crashed and perished on 911 yet 9 are still alive? It was the synagogue which gave the list of `19 men to the SWAMP.
The NTSB stated that some of the four hijacked planes like 11 and 77 did not fly on 911 so where did the officials gather the farce about the planes being hijacked?
The Military chief, while speaking to the savages, said that the war games, [originally set up to confuse the FAA], assisted the 911 process. How did it assist if not one plane intercepted?
Why didn’t the officials cancel war games at that critical time?
The officials called in only the family members to go and listen to LETS Roll because they surmise there would be little analytical skill present.
One individual spotted one 911 plane (by tail number) in use, in 2002.
Junior and his goons enacted a bill to compensate the airlines for loss. Was it ‘loss’ or something else, like keeping men quiet about the farce?
Do we see the agents who were involved in the 911 conspiracy? why they erred Lesson learned: The lengthy lawsuits demonstrate to the airlines why they should not conspire with the disciples.
The Arab hijacking tale was as phony as a seven dollar bill.
Finally, an alleged plane crashed into a square building entering from the north, and wallup, it exited through the east wall.
People like real terrorist watching the tall tales of 911 were encouraged, because terrorism in the United States seemed so easy; and the commies laughed: “ There goes the paper tiger.”. Finally the deception terrorists planted lawyers who jumped to file frivolous suits against the wrong defendants. Then they also had the disciple adjudicator whose role was to rule for the culprits and chase away the complainants. CONCLUSION: The theorists and investigative journalists can unearth barrels of conspiracy data, then why can't the billion dollar investigative agencies find a teaspoon full of evidence? A matter for very serious consideration !!!
Plane went through steel and concrete without shedding a single part!
_________________
Tsunami, my foot!
_________________
"...For those who view themselves as Chosen and above the law, such abuse is their God-given right. To behave otherwise would be irrational..." Jeff Gates, Author
_________________
"The world's International Political Gangsters (IPG) and the International Cabal of War Thugs (ICOWT),hate truth like a ton of poison. If truth should be told about well-known events, some of the world's pillars would crumble into chaos and impecuniousity. Thus, they maintain falsehood by any means necessary."Whilimena
__________________
The Whilimena Chronicles:
We have carefully reviewed some data: (a) 9-11 Commission Report (b) verbal comments
made by al Qaeda kingpins (c) actions and inactions of the said kingpins. The Team
has concluded that those 9-11 'dingbatic' crooks have been lucidly identified. And,
note carefully that Osama bin Laden is not on this initial list. WHY?
"...On June 5, 2006, the
Muckraker Report
contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-..., to learn why Bin Laden’s Most
Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11.
______________
spoke with Rex... , Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why
there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said:..
'The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is
because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.' "
The Muckraker Report
________________
"bin Laden did it - huh!
Then how come bin Laden never block any investigation? Or, is al Qaeda right here in Washington, DC?" Whilimena
_____________
CIA obstructed 9/11 investigators: report Sat Dec 22, 2:20 PM ET
The CIA obstructed an official US investigation into the September 11 attacks by
withholding tapes of interrogations of Al-Qaeda operatives, according to former
investigators quoted in a report on Saturday. A review of documents by former
members of the 9/11 commission revealed the panel made repeated, detailed requests
to the spy agency in 2003 and 2004 for information about the interrogation of
members of the extremist network, but were never notified of the tapes, the New York
Times reported. The review of the commission's correspondence with the Central
Intelligence Agency came after the agency earlier this month revealed it had
destroyed videotapes in 2005 that showed harsh interrogations of two Al-Qaeda
members. The review, written up in a December 13 memo prepared by Philip Zelikow,
the former executive director of the 9/11 commission, said that "further
investigation is needed" to resolve whether the CIA's failure to hand over the tapes
violated federal law. The memorandum does not assert that withholding the tapes was
illegal but states that federal law penalizes anyone who "knowingly and wilfully"
withholds or "covers up" a "material fact" from a federal inquiry, the newspaper
said. The revelation adds to pressure on President George W. Bush's administration,
already under fire over the affair by human rights groups and lawmakers who allege
that destroying the tapes covered up proof of torture. Responding to the New York
Times report, the CIA said the commission never specifically asked for interrogation
videos. CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield told AFP the agency had gone to "great lengths"
to satisfy the panel's requests, and that commission members had been provided with
details from interrogations of detainees. "The 9/11 commission certainly had access
to, and drew from, detailed information that had been provided by terrorist
detainees. That's how they reconstructed the plot in their comprehensive report," he
said. "Because it was thought the commission could ask about tapes at some point,
they were not destroyed while the commission was active." The two chairs of the
commission, former Democratic lawmaker Lee Hamilton and former New Jersey governor
Thomas Kean, told the newspaper the review showed the CIA had actively tried to
impede the panel's work. Kean said the panel would give the memorandum to federal
officials and lawmakers in Congress who are investigating the destruction of the
tapes. Hamilton said the CIA "clearly obstructed" the panel's probe. According to
the memo posted on the New York Times' website, the commission was interested in
interrogations of Al-Qaeda members because it was trying to reconstruct the events
leading up to the attacks of September 11, 2001, on New York and Washington. The
commission made initial general requests for intelligence information from
interrogations, including the two detainees on the destroyed videotapes, Abu
Zubaydah and Abd al-Rashim al-Nashiri, said the memorandum. It followed up with more
requests for "very detailed information" about the context of the interrogations,
the credibility of statements from detainees, the quality of language translation
and other issues. "The commission was dissatisfied with the answers it received to
these questions," Zelikow's memorandum said. None of the officials who communicated
with the panel ever revealed the existence of the videotapes, it said. The CIA
spokesman cited earlier public comments by the 9/11 commission about the spy
agency's cooperation, such as "the CIA provided great assistance" to its
investigation. "The CIA has cooperated fully in making available both the documents
and interviews that we have needed so far on this topic," it said. A senior
intelligence official speaking on condition of anonymity told AFP that news stories
about interrogation techniques had already appeared when the commission made its
final report. "If the commission had wanted to make an issue of how the information
was obtained from the detainees as opposed to what was learned from them, they had
an opportunity to do so at the time," the official said. "They didn't do that."
____________________________
Preview US Military war games on 9-11
___________________
December 22, 2007 9/11 Panel Study Finds That C.I.A. Withheld Tapes
By MARK MAZZETTI WASHINGTON —
A review of classified documents by former members of the Sept. 11 commission shows that the panel made repeated and detailed requests to the Central Intelligence Agency in 2003 and 2004 for documents and other information about the interrogation of operatives of Al Qaeda, and were told by a top C.I.A. official that the agency had “produced or made available for review” everything that had been requested. The review was conducted earlier this month after the disclosure that in November 2005, the C.I.A. destroyed videotapes documenting the interrogations of two Qaeda operatives. A seven-page memorandum prepared by Philip D. Zelikow, the panel’s former executive director, concluded that “further investigation is needed” to determine whether the C.I.A.’s withholding of the tapes from the commission violated federal law. In interviews this week, the two chairmen of the commission, Lee H. Hamilton and Thomas H. Kean, said their reading of the report had convinced them that the agency had made a conscious decision to impede the Sept. 11 commission’s inquiry. Mr. Kean said the panel would provide the memorandum to the federal prosecutors and congressional investigators who are trying to determine whether the destruction of the tapes or withholding them from the courts and the commission was improper. A C.I.A. spokesman said that the agency had been prepared to give the Sept. 11 commission the interrogation videotapes, but that commission staff members never specifically asked for interrogation videos. The review by Mr. Zelikow does not assert that the commission specifically asked for videotapes, but it quotes from formal requests by the commission to the C.I.A. that sought “documents,” “reports” and “information” related to the interrogations. Mr. Kean, a Republican and a former governor of New Jersey, said of the agency’s decision not to disclose the existence of the videotapes, “I don’t know whether that’s illegal or not, but it’s certainly wrong.” Mr. Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana, said that the C.I.A. “clearly obstructed” the commission’s investigation. A copy of the memorandum, dated Dec. 13, was obtained by The New York Times. Among the statements that the memorandum suggests were misleading was an assertion made on June 29, 2004, by John E. McLaughlin, the deputy director of central intelligence, that the C.I.A. “has taken and completed all reasonable steps necessary to find the documents in its possession, custody or control responsive” to formal requests by the commission and “has produced or made available for review” all such documents. Both Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton expressed anger after it was revealed this month that the tapes had been destroyed. However, the report by Mr. Zelikow gives them new evidence to buttress their views about the C.I.A.’s actions and is likely to put new pressure on the Bush administration over its handling of the matter. Mr. Zelikow served as counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from 2005 to the end of 2006. In an interview on Friday, Mr. McLaughlin said that agency officials had always been candid with the commission, and that information from the C.I.A. proved central to their work. “We weren’t playing games with them, and we weren’t holding anything back,” he said. The memorandum recounts a December 2003 meeting between Mr. Kean, Mr. Hamilton and George J. Tenet, then the director of central intelligence. At the meeting, it says, Mr. Hamilton told Mr. Tenet that the C.I.A. should provide all relevant documents “even if the commission had not specifically asked for them.” According to the memorandum, Mr. Tenet responded by alluding to several documents that he thought would be helpful to the commission, but made no mention of existing videotapes of interrogations. The memorandum does not draw any conclusions about whether the withholding of the videotapes was unlawful, but it notes that federal law penalizes anyone who “knowingly and willfully” withholds or “covers up” a “material fact” from a federal inquiry or makes “any materially false statement” to investigators. Mark Mansfield, the C.I.A. spokesman, said that the agency had gone to “great lengths” to meet the commission’s requests, and that commission members had been provided with detailed information obtained from interrogations of agency detainees. “Because it was thought the commission could ask about the tapes at some point, they were not destroyed while the commission was active,” Mr. Mansfield said. Intelligence officials have said the tapes that were destroyed documented hundreds of hours of interrogations during 2002 of Abu Zubaydah and Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri, two Qaeda suspects who were taken into C.I.A. custody that year. According to the memorandum from Mr. Zelikow, the commission’s interest in obtaining accounts from Qaeda detainees in C.I.A. custody grew out of its attempt to reconstruct the events leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States. Its requests for documents from the C.I.A. began in June 2003, when it first sought intelligence reports describing information obtained from prisoner interrogations, the memorandum said. It later made specific requests for documents, reports and information related to the interrogations of specific prisoners, including Abu Zubaydah and Mr. Nashiri. In December 2003, the commission staff sought permission to interview the prisoners themselves, but was permitted instead to give questions to C.I.A. interrogators, who then posed the questions to the detainees. The commission concluded its work in June 2004, and in its final report, it praised several agencies, including the C.I.A., for their assistance. Abbe D. Lowell, a veteran Washington lawyer who has defended clients accused of making false statements and of contempt of Congress, said the question of whether the agency had broken the law by omitting mention of the videotapes was “pretty complex,” but said he “wouldn’t rule it out.” Because the requests were not subpoenas issued by a court or Congress, C.I.A. officials could not be held in contempt for failing to respond fully, Mr. Lowell said. Apart from that, however, it is a crime to make a false statement "in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch." The Sept. 11 commission received its authority from both the White House and Congress. On Friday, the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey and to Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, asking them to preserve and produce to the committee all remaining video and audio recordings of “enhanced interrogations” of detainees in American custody. Signed by Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, the letter asked for an extensive search of the White House, C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies to determine whether any other recordings existed of interrogation techniques “including but not limited to waterboarding.” Government officials have said that the videos destroyed in 2005 were the only recordings of interrogations made by C.I.A. operatives, although in September government lawyers notified a federal judge in Virginia that the agency had recently found three audio and video recordings of detainees. Intelligence officials have said that those tapes were not made by the C.I.A., but by foreign intelligence services. Scott Shane contributed reporting. December 22, 2007
______________________
Preview the CASE FOR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION:
______________________
Furthermore, Osama bin Laden has not admitted to the crime:
“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States... I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam…America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates…Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed…The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system…those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity…They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia…Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy…You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks…I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word…The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness..." Osama (agent Osman) bin Laden
______________________
There is always someone who believes a story without checking the facts. When one observes or hears another who believes a weird story; especially the official 9-11 one, we should remember these quotes: (1)
"The madman who knows that he is mad is close to sanity." Juan Ruiz deAlacron (2) "The fool has already made up his mind. Do not confuse him with facts." Anonymous (3)
"I could not have believed how wide was the difference between savage and civilized men." Charles Darwin (4) "The difference between a patriot and a terrorist is whose side of the fence you are on."James Files, et al, (JFK Assassin)
_____________
"How do we know when the local al Qaeda boys pull off a scam? They generally identify the bogeymen very quickly with minute details; (as the FBI did with the 9-11 nineteen), yet decades later these hoods cannot provide any proof of the accused guilt." Whilimena
_____________
____________
Michael Springman: "Well initially I thought that is what it was. There was visa fraud. I had been told by one contact that the price for a visa at the American consulate was the equivalent of $2500 US. But once I got back to the United States, and was out of the foreign service, I ran across a couple of people with ties to the American government, that told me another story; that the CIA was recruiting fighters for the Afghan war against the then Soviets, and that their asset, Osama bin Laden was working with them. They had a recruiting office in Jeddah, they had a recruiting office in Riyadh, and third one somewhere in the Eastern province. And they would send these people to Jeddah, the fifth largest visa issuing post in the Middle East, for visas. They would apparently run these people straight over from their recruiting office over to my visa window. Well obviously, when they were not good solid businessmen, or good upstanding upper class people I would refuse them...They seemed to basically people with no real skills...Afghanistan was the end user of their facilities. My sources told me that they were coming to the United States for training as terrorists."
_____________
READ THIS FIRST SMOKING GUN: 9/11 researcher and activist Carol Valentine speculated in 2002 that:
"...Yes, NORAD trigger men, traitors, may have guided the 'suicide jets' on September 11. The dog we bought to guard the hen house may well have taken the day off and killed the chickens..."
That was Carol's speculation; then Major General Larry Arnold confirmed: "...we were able to identify, track and escort suspected hijacked aircraft after the initial attacks...our reaction time outpaced the process in some instances..."Major General Larry Arnold (NORAD) (Then folks - if the Military's efforts 'outpaced' that of the hijackers, how the hell not one craft intercepted?)
_____________
CIA August 6, 2001:
"Based on a review of all source reporting over the last five months, we believe that UBL (Usama bin Laden) will launch a significant attack against U.S. and/or Israeli interests in the coming weeks. The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualities against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning." (Now folks, al Qaeda takes John Public for idiot! Firstly, no citizen, writing about an attack against his country would use the word 'spectacular'. The writer was the attacker!) ________
Now good folks! The above warning was seen by 'Chief Marshall'; sorry Chief Myers. Yet on September 11th when all systems should have been on target, Dick Myers was absent from the NMCC until about 9:30 a.m. His own words: "Nobody informed us [Myself and the Senator] of that [plane striking Tower 2 at WTC]. But when we came out, that was obvious. Then, right at that time, somebody said the Pentagon had been hit." ________________
Folks this is 'thee' court-martial statement! No one informed General Myers that two 'planes' had struck two towers in Manhattan? And, surprisingly, no one in the chain-of-command disciplined as a result? Hah!) ________________
THE SMOKING GUNCaptain Karin Deshore: "Somewhere around the middle...there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode...with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out...and then it would just go all around...on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger; going both up and down and then all around the building."(New York Times) See gif above!!!!!
________________
"...the lowest floor of fire in the South Tower actually looked like someone had planted explosives around it because...everything blew out on the one floor..."Battalion Chief B. Dixon (Oral Histories 9-11) New York Times
________________
"I heard this metalic roar...just a peculiar site...one after the other exploding outward....whoever they [terrorists] are, had set charges. In fact the building was imploding down. I saw explosions..." John Bussey WSJ (The Breaking News of 9/11, Rowman & Littlefield)
________________
"Floor by floor, it started popping out...Yeah - detonated!" P. Zoda, New York Fire Department
________________
(Thought the fires brought down WTC? Think again! One building was struck at the 78th floor. Yet hear this: Chief Orio J. Palmer: "Battalion seven...Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire..." Ladder 15: "What stair are you in?" Ladder 15: "Chief, what stair you in?" Ladder 15: "Floor 78?" Chief: "Ten-four [Yes]"
"...in this exercise [Operation Amalgam Virgo] we used actual drone - NQM-107 drones, which are about the size of a cruise missile..." Colonel Alan Scott (Retired)
_______________
"...9:24 was the first time that we had been advised of American 77 as a possible hijacked airplane...We had just come out of a video teleconference...when I was handed a note that we had a possible hijacking at Boston center..." General Larry Arnold, NORAD __________________
Please see evidence of two fires in picture above!!!!!!!
__________________
9-11 Impact Statements, useful to the 9-11 Commission.Whilimena:
_______________
We heard that Rudi Giuliani gave impact statements in the Moussaoui case. It would be of great interest to the people of the world, especially relatives and friends of those murdered on 9-11, to ascertain what in the world Rudi could be saying at the Moussaoui trial; considering that the first-responders were not called. And those who volunteered (like Rodriquez) to give testimony elsewhere were rediculed with classic 'JFK Specter' 'Philidelphia' tricks.
It is crystal clear that the impact statements of the first-responders at WTC on September 11, 2001 expressed the view that bombs were going off in the buildings. It is also crystal clear that Osama bin Laden could NOT have planted explosives in the WTC prior 9-11 because of the 'tight' security. Consequently, the Attorney General and District Attorney of New York must empanel a Grand Jury to investigate these numerous claims. It must be carefully noted that a complaint was filed with the said New York law enforcement officials, by citizens of these United States (2004), seeking an investigation into the 9-11 scam. So far, that complaint is sitting idle in File 13. Why? And, do we really know that if it wasn't for The Jersey Girls not even the so-called Commission would have been created to look into the nation's most vicious crime? By the way Poppy Junior mentioned the use of explosives in one of his presentations! " __________
Those so-called 9-11 Commissioners complaining that 'we should have'.The 9-11 Commission, according to its own website, was:"...an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W Bush in late 2002". The commission is "...chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks".Mark you, this is the same Commission which rediculed witnesses. __________
IMPACT STATEMENTS- 9-11:“...there was just an explosion.... It seemed like on television, they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash - the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“...it was professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem”.Zionists travelling in Van on 9-11 The Guardian:
“...police and fire officials were carrying out the first wave of evacuations when the first of the World Trade Centre towers collapsed. Some eyewitnesses reported hearing another explosion just before the structure crumbled. Police said that it looked almost like a ‘planned implosion.’" Engineer Mike Pecoraro:
“There was nothing there but rubble,” ...“We're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic
press--gone!” ... "like a piece of aluminum foil."
"... The evidence indicates that, at the least, the highest circles in the White House knew a spectacular attack was in the works in the days and weeks preceeding 9/11 -- warnings were coming into the White House from a host of foreign leaders and intelligence agencies -- but chose to do nothing, presumably to make use of those events in the service of their hidden agenda.Similarly, nothing was done as a result of the government's own intelligence warnings..." Bernard Weiner, Ph.D.
Mark Loizeaux, of Controlled Demolition, Inc: “If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure.” FDNY Captain Dennis Tardio:
_____________
"I hear an explosion and I look up. It is as if the building is being imploded, from the top floor down, one after another, boom, boom, boom." _____________
The Ha'aretz article by Sara Leibovich-Dar reveals the "close ties with Netanyahu" that Silverstein has:
"The two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu's stint as Israel's ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance," the Israeli newspaper reported. ______________
Firefighter Louie Cacchioli: “...another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later . . . I’m thinking, ‘Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!’ ” __________
Teresa Veliz: “There were explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons. . . . There was another explosion. And another. I didn't know where to run." _____________
Steve Evans: “I was at the base of the second tower . . . that was hit. . . . There was an explosion. . . . The base of the building shook. . . . [T]hen there was a series of explosions.” ____________
Sue Keane: “[I]t sounded like bombs going off. That's when the explosions happened. . . . I knew something was going to happen. . . . It started to get dark, then all of a sudden there was this massive explosion.” Then, discussing her experiences during the collapse of the north tower, she said: “[There was] another explosion. That sent me and the two firefighters down the stairs. . . . I can't tell you how many times I got banged around. Each one of those explosions picked me up and threw me. . . . There was another explosion, and I got thrown with two firefighters out onto the street.”
Wall Street Journal reporter John Bussey: “I . . . looked up out of the office window to see what seemed like perfectly synchronized explosions coming from each floor. . . . One after the other, from top to bottom, with a fraction of a second between, the floors blew to pieces.”
Another Wall Street Journal reporter: “‘My God, they’re going to bring the building down.’ And they, whoever they are, HAD SET CHARGES. . . . I saw the explosions.”
Beth Fertig of WNYC Radio: “It just descended like a timed explosion-like when they are deliberately bringing a building down. . . . It was coming down so perfectly that in one part of my brain I was thinking...They got everyone out, and they're bringing the building down because they have to.'”
Firefighter Timothy Julian: “First I thought it was an explosion. I thought maybe there was a bomb on the plane, but delayed type of thing, you know secondary device. . . . I just heard like an explosion and then a cracking type of noise, and then it sounded like a freight train, rumbling and picking up speed, and I remember I looked up, and I saw it coming down.”
Emergency medical technician Michael Ober: “[W]e heard a rumble, some twisting metal, we looked up in the air, and . . . it looked to me just like an explosion. It didn’t look like the building was coming down, it looked like just one floor had blown completely outside of it. . . . I didn’t think they were coming down. I just froze and stood there looking at it.”
Chief Frank Cruthers: “There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse." __________
Paul Curran: “...all of a sudden the ground just started shaking. It felt like a train was running under my feet. . . . The next thing we know, we look up and the tower is collapsing.”
Lieutenant Bradley Mann of the fire department: "Shortly before the first tower came down,” ... “I remember feeling the ground shaking. I heard a terrible noise, and then debris just started flying everywhere. People started running." “...we basically had the same thing: The ground shook again, and we heard another terrible noise and the next thing we knew the second tower was coming down."
Paramedic Kevin Darnowski: "I started walking back up towards Vesey Street. I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.”
____________
Gregg Brady: “I heard 3 loud explosions. I look up and the north tower is coming down now."
Thomas Turilli: “...it almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight."
Craig Carlsen: “...heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down.”
Rumsfeld - interviewed by Lyric Wallwork Winik, Parade Magazine Friday, Oct. 12, 2001. "Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."
Timothy Burke: “...the building popped, lower than the fire...”
Edward Cachia: “As my officer and I were looking at the south tower, it just gave. It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . . we originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down.”
Lieutenant James Walsh: "The [north tower] didn't fall the way you would think tall buildings would fall. Pretty much it looked like it imploded on itself."
Assistant Commissioner Stephen Gregory: “I thought . . . before . . . [WTC 2] came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . Lieutenant Evangelista . . . asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw.”
Captain Karin Deshore: “Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash.”...“Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building."
Firefighter Richard Banaciski: “...there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”
Deputy Commissioner Thomas Fitzpatrick: "We looked up at the [south tower] . . . . All we saw was a puff of smoke coming from about 2 thirds of the way up . . . . It looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building. . . . My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV."
Captain Jay Swithers: “I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion.”
Firefighter James Curran: “When I got underneath the north bridge I looked back and . . . I heard like every floor went chu-chu-chu. Looked back and from the pressure everything was getting blown out of the floors before it actually collapsed."
Battalion Chief Brian Dixon: “I was . . . hearing a noise and looking up. . . . the lowest floor of fire in the south tower actually looked like someone had planted explosives around it because . . . everything blew out on the one floor. I thought, geez, this looks like an explosion up there, it blew out."
Firefighter Stephen Viola: “You heard like loud booms . . . "
Battalion Chief Dominick DeRubbio: “It was weird how it started to come down. It looked like it was a timed explosion."
Firefighter Kenneth Rogers: "[T]here was an explosion in the south tower. . . . I kept watching. Floor after floor after floor. One floor under another after another and when it hit about the fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb, because it looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing. I was there in '93."
Firefighter Christopher Fenyo: “At that point, a debate began to rage because. . . many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade, and officers were gathering companies together and the officers were debating whether or not to go immediately back in or to see what was going to happen with 1 World Trade at that point. The debate ended pretty quickly because 1 World Trade came down."
_______________________
Firefighter William Reynolds: “I said, ‘Chief, they're evacuating the other building; right?’ He said, ‘No.’ . . . I said, ‘Why not? They blew up the other one.’ I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, ‘If they blew up the one, you know they're gonna blow up the other one.’ He said, ‘No, they're not.’ I said, ‘Well, you gotta tell them to evacuate it, because it's gonna fall down and you gotta get the guys out.’ . . . He said, ‘I'm just the Battalion Chief. I can't order that.’ . . . I said, ‘You got a f...king radio and you got a f...king mouth. Use the f...king things. Empty this f...king building.’ Again he said, ‘I'm just a Battalion Chief. I can't do that.’ . . . Eventually this other chief came back and said, ‘They are evacuating this tower.’ . . . And sometime after that . . . I watched the north tower fall." ____________________
Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac: “...there were definitely bombs in those buildings...” Isaac added: “...many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they’re afraid for their jobs to admit it because the ‘higher-ups’ forbid discussion of this fact.”
________________
"Typical al Qaeda move whereby the witness is led to think that he/she is mistaken. It happened similarly in the JFK case." Whilimena
Read here:" Firefighter Louie Cacchioli: >
“I felt like I was being put on trial in a court room” .... “They were trying to twist my words and make the story fit only what they wanted to hear. All I wanted to do was tell the truth and when they wouldn’t let me do that, I walked out.”
"The 9-11 Commission of pure farce which now says that 'it should have'. See below:
"
The Smoking Gun
9/11 panel distrusted Pentagon testimony Commissioners considered criminal probe of false statements WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A member of the 9/11 commission said Wednesday that panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the Pentagon's inspector general... "We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting," Roemer told CNN. "We were not sure of the intent, whether it was to deceive the commission or merely part of the fumbling bureaucracy." ... "For more than two years after the attacks, officials with NORAD [the North American Aerospace Defense Command] and the FAA provided inaccurate information about the response to the hijackings in testimony and media appearances," The Washington Post reported Wednesday. "Authorities suggested that U.S. air defenses had reacted quickly, that jets had been scrambled in response to the last two hijackings and that fighters were prepared to shoot down United Airlines Flight 93 if it threatened Washington. "In fact, the commission reported a year later, audiotapes from NORAD's Northeast headquarters and other evidence showed clearly that the military never had any of the hijacked airliners in its sights and at one point chased a phantom aircraft -- American Airlines Flight 11 -- long after it had crashed into the World Trade Center," according to The Washington Post. CNN's Barbara Starr and Pam Benson contributed to this report. Question: Why would the Pentagon be aiding Osama binLaden; or was the Pentagon a part of the gang? ____________________
William Rodriguez: "I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower.”...“I contacted NIST . . . four times without a response. Finally, [at a public hearing] I asked them before they came up with their conclusion . . . if they ever considered my statements or the statements of any of the other survivors who heard the explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces.”**************
Flight 93 imbroglio (from anonymous source):
The physical Shanksville evidence does not show the crash site of a Boeing 757-200: • Amount of debris not consistent with a +120,000 lb aircraft• Crash imprint could only be caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash, which was not possible• Circular crater indicative of a below ground explosion• Grass and weeds are growing in the crater which clearly indicates the crater was made before 9/11 • Lack of fire damage• Mushroom cloud not consistent with 9,000 gallons of fuel exploding and burning• The three minute discrepancy• Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI. (13%) Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list: None. _____________________
"It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within..." Ray Griffin, Ph.D.
"We must hold the scoundrels accountable." Paul Craig Roberts, Ph.D.
FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH:
The Great Rummy, Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense - interviewed by Lyric Wallwork Winik, Parade Magazine Friday, Oct. 12, 2001.
"Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."
"Of all the terrorist incidents that took place on September 11, the one that underlines most starkly the poverty of the official account is undoubtedly the attack on the Pentagon. While the strikes on the Twin Towers in New York require a little investigative digging before their true and disturbing nature is uncovered, in the case of the Pentagon it isn't necessary to look at a single scrap of evidence. Even the most cursory review of the events leading up to the attack soon makes it abundantly clear that an unanticipated attack of this kind could not, in reality, happen at all..." Leonard Spencer
"...The application of scientific reasoning in the form of inference to the best explanation, applied to the relevant evidence, establishes that the official account of the events of 9/11 cannot be sustained...we are confronted by alternative accounts of what happened on 9/11, both of which qualify as 'conspiracy theories'. It is therefore no longer rational to dismiss one of them as a 'conspiracy theory' in favor of the other. The question becomes, Which of two 'conspiracy theories' is more defensible?..." James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
"...a small but gullible percentage of the population eager to lap up these tall tales, regardless of facts or rational analysis. One of the wilder stories circulating about September 11th - and one that has attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs - is that it was carried out by nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other than that they 'hate our freedoms'...the perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborate woven web of delusions...to the extent that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell...These crackpots even contend that the...regime was caught unawares by the attacks, had no hand in organizing them, and actually would have stopped them if it had been able. Blindly ignoring the stand down of the US air-force...the controlled demolition of the WTC, the firing of a missile into the Pentagon and a host of other documented proofs...So they [terrorists] got on board with false IDs but took their real passports with them?..." Gerard Holmgren
(Note: To the believers of the 9-11 official story, there is a saying thus: 'A fool has already made up his mind - do not confuse him with facts.')
)
____________________
The Whilimena Team does not create and compile data based on any 'wild-goose' conjecture; nor does it publish quotes created by crackpots and propagandists. Our sources whether from the caveman to the philosopher, are reliable and authoritative. If you see any information posted on this site that represents lies, please feel free to report it immediately. However, along with your critique, please just don't say that you think that you have identified lies; tell us what the truth is. Thank you. _________
"A steel building survived fires in experiments with extreme temperatures beyond the range possible with jet fuels." Cardingdon Fire Tests ___________
"While it may be difficult to awaken everyone from their state-induced fog of fear, we are at a critical point in history which requires us to try. We truly must take an objective look at the facts and evidence surrounding 9-11..." Dave Heller, Physicist
**********************
"We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the...events of September 11, 2001..." Robert Ballan, Ph.D.; Walter Davis, Ph.D.; A.K. Dewdney, Ph.D.; Derrick Grimmer, Ph.D.; Tim P. Powell, Ph.D.; Peter J. Kirsch, MD.; George F. Nelson (Retired Colonel).; Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D.; Helen Stace, Ph.D.; Greg Zeigler, Ph.D., et al. --------------------------
Whilimena says: We know about "Operation Global Cleanse 2000"
--------------------------
Just for those who say: 'My country right or wrong.''
"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise, he fails in his duty to stand by the country." Whilimena'Theodore Roosevelt
"If he looks like al Qaeda, acts like al Qaeda and talks like al Qaeda, he is al Qaeda; regardless of whether he is your neighborhood preacher or politician." Whilimena **********************
"What al Qaeda looks like?
'al Qaeda is not an organization...al Qaeda is a way of working.' Tony Blair
"...reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Dr. Richard Feynman
"...the high office of the President has been used to forment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight." John F. Kennedy (November 12, 1963, Columbia U.)
"Neither...morality nor...tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war...We are very far from any moral hesitations when concerned with the national struggle. First and foremost, terror is for us a part of the political war, appropriate for the circumstances of today..." Yitzhak Shamir _____________________
If you have a complaint; if you would like to receive updates on 9-11 or other political scams, if you want to support this cause for truth; please advise:Email:whilimena (at) netscape.netNo HTML messages accepted.
________________________________
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information write: Rae Wilson via: rae @ wilson .org Rae Wilson via: rae@raewilson.com
_________________________
"Many people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice." Michael Rivero __________________________
**************************
(a) '9/11 Commission could subpoena Oval Office files...' (NYTimes 26 October 2003) (b) '...9/11 Panel threatens to issue subpoena for Bush's briefings...'
(NYTimes 02/10/2004) Military notified on time. Commission911 Report: '...Between 8:25 a.m. and 8:32 a.m., in accordance with FAA protocol, Boston Center managers started notifying their chain-of-command that American 11 had been hijacked...The controller responsible for United 175 was unfortunately the same controller assigned the job of tracking the hijacked American 11...'
"I speak with firsthand experience (and for several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama bin laden." (US government official) Los Angeles Times (12/05/04)
_________________
This was Hanjour's double:
'...Hanjour went into the air in a cessna 172 with instructors...three times...[with the intention] to rent a plane from the airport...after three times in the air, they [instructors] still felt he was unable to fly solo...and instructors were surprised he was not able to fly better with the amount of experience [600 hours]' Prince George's Journal (September 18, 2001)
Whilimena says: "Intercepting aircraft is no puzzle for the Military. AP (08/12/02) reported that between September 200 and June of 2001, jets were dispatched 67 times to assess situations where it was thought that aircraft were in danger. 67 times. Yet on September 11th, the Conspiracy-of-Dunces (COD) cannot explain what was done to protect America. When asked, all members of the COD play darn lunatics. They all blame each other - they think - they did not know, and they do not recall."
Was the Military confused on 9-11? Hell no! FAA Order 7610.4J7-1-2: 'The escort service [fighter intercept] will be requested by the FAA hijack coordinator by direct contact with the National Military Command Center (NMCC).''In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses...forward requests for DOD [Department of Defense] assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval.' CJCSI 3610.01A (June, 2001)
Did the FAA notify the Military? Yes they did: Commission911 Report: '...Between 8:25 a.m. and 8:32 a.m., in accordance with FAA protocol, Boston Center managers started notifying their chain-of-command that American 11 had been hijacked...The controller responsible for United 175 was unfortunately the same controller assigned the job of tracking the hijacked American 11...' What was the real reason for al Qaeda to strike WTC? WTC had the most foreigners in such close proximity. This slaughter was like 'killing two birds with one stone'. Dozens of Third World citizens killed cemented the coalition: '...[they] explicitly urge[d] painting over the US's actual reasons for warfare as a necessity for mobilizing public support for a conflict." Sydney Morning Herald (12/26/02).
Tony Blair: "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11." (London Times, July 17, 2002) Gore Vidal: 'Osama, if it was he and not a nation, simply provided the necessary shock to put in train a war of conquest...'
Is the Military equipped to tap into the nation's radar system in an emergency? Oh yes! 'Located in the Pentagon, the NMCC can tap into radar stations and thus monitor dangerous emergencies and hijackings...' CNN, 10/26/99 Some of the thugs were heard talking about 'shock and awe'. They used words like 'spectacular' and 'magnificent' to describe the impending attacks. A writer who describes an attack on his own country does not use the word 'spectacular': The American Heritage Dictionary defines 'spectacular' thus: 'Of the nature of a spectacle; impressive or sensational...An elaborate display...splendid in appearance; grand...' Here again we find the operatives using the word 'spectacular':
Eric Lichtblau: "...The report discloses that the Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijacking overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that if '...the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, ... domestic hijacking would probably be preferable."
Israeli news sources said that the dirty Mossad was 'documenting the event'; and they certainly did. The video ended up in the hands of al Qaeda. The dirty Mossad needs its video footage of 9-11 to use as a leach to blackmail Washington al Qaeda members forever. Other nations and groups may 'hold it over the head' of Berzelius 'Buzz' Windrip to be used as leverage.
(Have you guys read the 1935 book 'It couldn't Happen Here'? The main character was Berzelius 'Buzz' Windrip) This character is the same one mentioned in the bogus Nostradamus reports. My good friend Buzz! His judgment: To additionally explain who he is we should listen to what he said after thousands were killed and missiles smashed up the pentagon and three buildings at WTC:
"[Regarding 9-11, I commend Gen Richard Myers our Military Chief, for his]...calm manner, sound judgment, and his clear strategic thinking." Imagine thousands dead - the Military chief did absolutely nothing; and one commends him for his 'clear strategic thinking'.
My God! What a Christian! And folks, according to Myers, he did not reach NMCC until about 9:30. So please tell me what Buzz called: 'clear strategic thinking'. Did al Qaeda procure warnings about the September 11 attacks? Oh yes!
Entities that gave warnings: (1) Frankfurter Algemeine Zeitung (FAZ) (2) Internet News Online (3) French Intelligence (4) Russian Intelligence including KGB top man Putin who warned the COD '...in the strongest possible terms...' '...Britain gives the US another warning about an al Qaeda attack...this warning specifies multiple airplane hijackings. This warning is included in Bush's briefing on August 6. (Sunday Herald 5/19/02)..."
CooperativeResearch "...A CIA official affirmed that:'there was something specific in early August that said to us that [bin Laden] was determined in striking on US soil.' A major excuse given since 9/11 is that the Bush administration was focused on overseas attacks, and didn't expect a domestic attack...(AP 10/3/01)..." CooperativeReaserch Those who would habor such thoughts are already in Bellevue - not holding high office in Washington. '...The CIA issues a report warning the White House, Pentagon and Department of State that bin laden is intent on launching a terrorist attack soon, possibly inside the US. (Sunday Herald 9/23/01)...' CooperativeResearch
'We are going to be struck soon, many Americans are going to die, and it could be in the US.' Cofer Black, CIA (via Congressional Inquiry, 09/26/02) There are numerous reports indicating that the COD had various warnings or prior knowledge; and that during and after the slaughter, the said COD had reasons to know that the mainstream story about bin Laden and his cronies, as the only conspirators, was false: Washington Post, 9/23/01 New York Times, 9/19/02 Senate Intel Committee 9/18/02 Los Angeles Times 12/05/04 USA Today 4/19/04 New York Times, 10/03/01 New York Times, 09/26/01 (Mubarak warned United States.) Washington Post 10/22/02 ABC 10/23/02 AP 12/18/02 BBC 11/06/01 Sunday Herald 10/05/02 Sunday Herald 05/19/02 (Britain issues second warning.) Sydney Morning Herald 12/26/02 Guardian 09/30/01 Guardian 11/01/01 Fox News 05/17/02 (Warning from German and Russian intel.) Independent 09/07/02 London Times 11/01/01 CBS 07/26/01 Newsweek 09/15/01 Boston Globe 09/20/01 CNN 09/12/01 Chicago Tribune 03/18/02 LA Times 10/27/02 Wall Street Journal, 09/19/02 (Intel agencies know of terrorists' intent to attack.) CS Monitor, 05/23/02, (Jordanian Intel warned US.) August 6, 2001, (Buzz received memo regarding specific terrorist threat.) More warnings! Other elements like the dirty Mossad had intricate knowledge about the impending attacks. A prosecution team could argue these points for the lynching of the perpetrators of 9-11. (1) Ehud Barak for example was on television reading from a prepared speech, lambasting 'rogue states' that threatened 'our way of life': 'If it is a kind of bin Laden organization..., I believe this is the time to deploy globally a concerted effort led by the United States...against all sources of terror...rogue states...rogue states like Iran, Iraq and Libya...our way of life will be threatened...isolate from the world every nation that is hosting them...be ready with all the pain that comes with it...It's time to launch an operational concrete war against terror.' Incidentally! Look at the background picture in the studio during the Barak presentation! You may see something! Questions: (a) When did Ehud schedule that slot on prime time television? (b) How could Ehud have known so much, so fast? (c) Doesn't his presentation sound like the Dubya script for the 'war on terror'? (d) wasn't it strange that all al Qaeda bosses fingered Osama bin Laden immediately after the attacks - eventhough they claim that they did not have any information about the impending attacks. Folks, when al Qaeda planned the Avenging Angels (9-11) operation, they said that it would be the greatest yet. However, because Daddy used some of his old dunces; 9-11 was the most seriously botched major crime. Their first major mistake? The demolition of WTC 7. ********* Did the Military have the proper equipment to detect 9-11? Yes, yes, yes! Nicky Hager, author of 'Secret Power' states: 'The ECHELON system, designed and coordinated by the U.S. national Security Agency (NSA) is one of the world's biggest, most closely held intelligence projects. Unlike many of the Cold War electronic spy systems, ECHELON is designed primarily to gather electronic transmissions from nonmilitary targets: governments, organizations, businesses, and individuals in virtually every country. The system works by indiscriminately intercepting very large quantities of communications and using computers to identify and extract messages of interest from the mass of unwanted ones...' Could the Military intercept the craft? Oh yes! Facsnet: 'Controlling the aircraft from the ground is nothing new. The military has been flying obsolete high performance fighter aircraft as target drones since the 1950's. In fact, NORAD...had at its disposal a number of U.S. Air Force General Dynamics F-106 Delta Dart fighter aircraft configured to be remotely flown into combat as early as 1959... These aircraft could be started, taxied, taken off, flown into combat, fight, and return to a landing entirely by remote control, with the only human intervention needed being to fuel and re-arm them.' Follow this piece done by Suelette Dreyfus (psychicspy) dated 11/17/99 almost two years before 9-11: 'The US National Security Agency has designed and patented a new technology that could aid it in spying on international telephone calls. The NSA patent, granted on 10 August, is for a system of automatic topic spotting and labeling of data...The NSA's invention is intended automatically to sift through human speech transcripts in any language...Bruce Schneier, author of Applied Cryptography, a textbook on the science of keeping information secret, believes the NSA currently has the ability to use computers to transcribe voice conversations...To date, it has been widely believed that while the NSA has the capability to conduct fully automated, mass electronic eavesdropping on e-mail, faxes and other written communications, it cannot do so on telephone calls...The NSA relies on an international web of eavesdropping stations around the world, commonly known as Echelon, to listen into private international communications...US Patent number 5,937,422 reveals that the NSA has designed technology to overcome these barriers...The NSA current spy technology may be more advanced than methods described in the patent...'
The ACLU reported: 'A project of the United States Department of Defense, Total Informational Awareness (TIA) is designed to gather personal data on a grand scale, including emails, phone calls, financial records, transportation habits, and medical information. Its proponents believe that by scanning and analyzing this massive pile of data, government agents will be able to predict and prevent crime...
United States - CarnivoreThis Internet surveillance program, which is currently being used by the United States government, is somewhat similar to ECHELON...United States intelligence officials have developed two programs which many experts believe may be used...One of these programs, Oasis, automatically creates machine-readable transcripts from television and audio broadcasts...The other program, FLUENT, allows English-language keyword searches of non-English materials...United States - TEMPESTReports have indicated the existence of another NSA project that is designed to capture computer signals...through walls or from other buildings, even if the computers are not linked to a network...' *********
I Whilimena, would like to sit and have a few Vodka and orange with Buzz to chat a little. One moment I think that he probably did not know about 9-11 and yet another minute I think otherwise. I say this because of some of the things he said: On the day of the attacks it was The Buzz who remarked at Barksdale: 'Make no mistake - the United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts.'
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama binLaden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him!". George (September 13, 2001 And, listen to this - although The Buzz said that he would 'hunt down' the terrorists, ABC, March 13, 2002, reported that he later stated: 'I truly am not that concerned about him [Osama bin Laden].'"I don't know where binLaden is! I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." George (March 13, 2002) _________________
Is there a history of Military 'stand down'? Oh Yes! Jack Blum unleashed this bombshell: 'We [investigators] ran into another procedure which was extremely troubling. There was a system for stopping Customs inspections of inbound and outbound aircraft from Miami and from other airports in Florida. People would call the Customs office and say, 'Stand down. Flights are going out. Flights are coming in'.
_____________________
What do ya make of this?: In an interview with patriot Alex Jones, Attorney Stanley Hilton stated: 'Our case [lawsuit] is alleging that Bush [43] and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth; Tenet - were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen...We have some very incriminating documents as well as eyewitnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage...I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60's with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years...Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc., for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it...The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents...It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent...at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th...is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip...when he said he had, quote, 'seen on television the first plane attack the first tower.' Funny, but since Stanley started his whistleblowing, he has been under constant fire from al Qaeda operatives. Who trained the alleged terrorists for the 9-11 mission - Saddam Hussein? Manuel Noriega? Kim Jung Il? No bro! It was our boys! Those terrorists got their training in America, in full view of the security forces. Firstly, some practised at a place name 'Ground Zero' where American police lamented that the vehicles used for target practice were school buses and police cars.
'U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in [September 11] terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s' Newsweek (09/15/01)
The crackpots who made the hole in Pennsylvania failed to construct it to show a craft crashing from an angle. There was green grass in the hole. What about the vertical free-fall of the WTC towers could this be as a result of impacts and fire? Hell no!
Jerry Russell, MA (Eng) and Ph.D.(Psychol). He wrote: '...The trick is to distribute explosives at key points throughout the structure. The explosives are detonated simultaneously, destroying the integrity of the steel frame at key points, such that no part of the building is supported against the force of gravity. The entire mass is pulled swiftly to earth, where gravity does the work of pounding the structure into tiny fragments of steel and concrete. The gravitational potential energy of the structure is converted smoothly and uniformly into kinetic energy, and the is available very efficiently to pulverize the fragments of the building as they impact against the unyielding earth. Controlled demolitions have a striking and characteristic appearance of smooth, flowing collapse...the World Trade center collapses looked like controlled demolitions...According to the law of gravity, it is possible to calculate the time it takes for an object to fall a given distance. The equation is H=(1/2) at 2, where H is the height, a is the acceleration of gravity (10 meters per second squared) and t is time in seconds. Plug in the height of the building at 1350 feet (411 meters) and we get 9 seconds. That is just about the length of time it took for the very top of the World Trade Center to fall to the street below. According to all reports, the whole thing was over in just about ten seconds...'
Does the dirty Mossad have a history of knowing everything? Oh Yes! They knew about a few things which would either make them God, or conspirators. Frankly their stories cannot be believed. (1) They have a reputation of bringing false news to Washington. "Israeli intelligence, not the Reagan administration, was a major source of some of the most dramatic published reports about a Lybian assassination team allegedly sent to kill President Reagan and other top U.S. officials...Israel, which informed sources said has 'wanted an excuse to go in and bash Lybia for a longtime', may be trying to build American public support for a strike against [Ghaddafi]." Los Angeles Times (2) '...[the Mossad] had made up the hit-squad story in order to cause problems for one of israel's enemies.' Washington Post
_______________
THE SMOKING GUN: '...I would just mention that General Myers and Paul Wolfowitz have been intimately involved in the work of the Department prior to September 11th, on September 11th and subsequent to September 11th...
How many countries would have joined [without 9-11]? Any? Not likely...We would have heard objections to preemption similar to those voiced before the coalition launched Operation Iraqi Freedom. We would have been asked, 'How could you attack Afghanistan when it was al Qaida that attacked us, not the Taliban?' 'How can you go to war when countries in the region don't support you?' 'Won't launching such an invasion actually promote terrorist attacks against the United States?'...Unfortunately history shows that it can take a tragedy like September 11 to waken the world to new threats and to the need for action...During the course of the day, [September 11] the President indicated he expected us to provide him with robust options for military responses to that attack...A 90-nation coalition is a big thing...Someone asked me if Osama bin Laden is masterminding all of this...there were a number of reports about potential hijacking...I didn't say we didn't know. I said I didn't know...we began the process quite quickly of making changes to the standing rules of engagement, Dick Myrers and I did, and then issuing that...' Donald H. Rummy 'Canary Mouth' Rumsfeld (Testimony to the Kean Commission)
______________________
Rep. Curt Weldon -Vice Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. Ten-term Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania. "There's something very sinister going on here that really troubles me," "What's the Sept. 11 commission got to hide?"
"There's something wrong here, something tragically wrong. The American people, the families, the country and the Congress need to know the truth, the whole truth, the complete truth. And so far we haven't gotten it. … Somebody's got to connect the dots and answer the questions. If the 9/11 Commission won't do it, then Congress has to do it." http://www.globalresearch.ca/... http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050917&articleId=965
Senator Max Cleland - Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003. Currently serves on the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. U.S. Senator from Georgia 1996-2002. Secretary of State of Georgia 1982-1996. Administrator of the U.S. Veterans Administration 1977-1981. Captain, U.S. Army awarded Silver Star and Bronze Star for bravery in Viet Nam. Triple amputee from war injuries. "It is a national scandal."http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/... http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/11/21/cleland/index.html?pn=1
Louis Freeh - Director of the FBI, 1993-2001. "Even the most junior investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself. … No wonder the 9/11 families were outraged by these revelations and called for a "new" commission to investigate." http://www.opinionjournal.com/...
Morgan Reynolds, PhD "I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. … We can prove that the government’s story is false." http://video.google.com/videoplay?... "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely [to] prove to be sound." http://www.lewrockwell.com/... http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html
Paul Craig Roberts, PhD "We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to "pancake" at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/... http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14566.htm
Catherine Austin Fitts - Assistant Secretary of Housing under George H.W. Bush. "The official story could not possibly have happened. … It’s not possible. It’s not operationally feasible. … The Commission was a whitewash." (Radio KPFA 9/9/04 http://157.22.130.4/... http://157.22.130.4/data/20040909-Thu1700.mp3
"The first category of people who benefited were those who are guilty and complicit in designing, implementing and financing the 9-11 operation. On such a sophisticated and successful covert operation, the people responsible would have had budgets and financing and would have organized the operation to maximize their political and financial benefits." http://globalresearch.ca/... http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FIT403A.html
Edward L. Peck - Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under Ronald Reagan. Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department. U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq (1977-80). 32-year veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service. Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11 "We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry."http://www.911truth.org/article. ... http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
Morton Goulder - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning 1973-77 Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11 "We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article. ... http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11 "We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?... http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
William Christison - Former National Intelligence Officer and Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis. 29-year CIA veteran. "I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. … The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them." http://www.dissidentvoice.org... http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Aug06/Christison14.htm
"David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too," said Christison. … I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen. … The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes. … All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions." http://www.prisonplanet.com/... http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/070906insidejob.htm
Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) Video: ""One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?" http://www.undersiegemovie.com ... http://www.undersiegemovie.com/media/stubblebine.wmv
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) Article: "The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it ‘the dog that doesn't hunt.’ ‘I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate,’ he said." http://www.prisonplanet.com/... http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm
Raymond L. McGovern - Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, CIA, responsible for preparing the President’ Daily Brief (PDB) for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. 27-year CIA veteran. : "I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 report is a joke. The question is: What’s being covered up? Is it gross malfeasance, gross negligence, misfeasance? … Now there are a whole bunch of unanswered questions. And the reason they’re unanswered is because this administration will not answer the questions. … I just want to reassert, what Scott [Ritter, former Major in the U.S. Marines Corps, former Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq] said and this is the bottom line for me, just as Hitler in 1933 cynically exploited the burning of the parliament building, the Reichstag, this is exactly what our President did in exploiting 9/11. The cynical way in which he played on our trauma, used it to justify attacking, making a war of aggression on a country that he knew had nothing to do with 9/11. That suffices for me, I think Scott is exactly right, that’s certainly an impeachable offense." http://video.google.com/videoplay?... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1232419751782017310&q=
Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible. … Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney. I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder."http://video.google.com/... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) "The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.... http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. "The government's story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple." … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have "descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 270 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon's first floor wall without touching the lawn." … "For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible - there is not one chance in a thousand..." http://www.arcticbeacon.com/17-Jul-2005.... http://www.arcticbeacon.com/17-Jul-2005.html
"The airplane [Flight 77] could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall. The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … And so for them to expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous. …It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building. There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile." http://911underground.com/.../http://911underground.com/wingtv/
Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army "I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false. ... [A]nomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers' names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC1, 2, and 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon ..." Melvin Goodman - Division Chief and Senior Analyst at the Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA,1966 to 1990. Senior Analyst at the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974 to 1976. Congressional testimony: "I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission." http://www.house.gov/mckinney/... http://www.house.gov/mckinney/20050722transcript.pdf
Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11 "We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?... http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D, U.S. Air Force (ret) "Reading through the official 9/11 report, I quickly lost my focus - apparently emulating the 9/11 commission over the past 20 months. …One wonders if the entire commission wasn't secretly replaced by pod people from the old Soviet Central Committee. I naively expected more constructive and useful information in the report." http://www.lewrockwell.com/... http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski88.html
Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) Article: Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile." http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.... http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm
Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) - Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998. Video: "I, like the others, are frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case." http://video.google.com/videoplay?... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1232419751782017310&q=%22ray+mcgovern%22&hl=en
Barbara Honegger - Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, the Navy’s advanced science, technology and national security affairs university. "The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC2, and in WTC7, which brought down all three buildings on 9/11. ... A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high−speed 270−degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon’s anti−aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system." http://blog.lege.net/... http://blog.lege.net/content/Seven_Hours_in_September.pdf
Sibel Edmonds - Former Language Translation Specialist, FBI. Witness before the 9/11 Commission. Letter to 9/11 Commission: "I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware of. Thus, I must assume that other serious issues that I am not aware of were in the same manner omitted from your report. These omissions cast doubt on the validity of your report and therefore on its conclusions and recommendations." http://www.commondreams.org... http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0802-06.htm
Bogdan Dzakovic - 14-year Counter-terrorism expert in the Security Division of the Federal Aviation Administration. Team Leader of the FAA's Red Team, which conducted undercover tests on airport security through simulated terrorist attacks. Former Team Leader in the Federal Air Marshal program. Former Coast Guard officer. Witness before the 9/11 Commission. "The best I could say about it is they really botched the job by not really going into the real failures. … At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is treasonous. And if you look at what the word "treason" means in the Webster’s Dictionary, it’s a betrayal of a trust." http://www.911report.com... http://www.911report.com/media/stevebogdan.pdf
Paul Hellyer - Former Minister of National Defense of Canada. Former Deputy Prime Minister. Former Member of House of Commons. "I think the inquiry has been very shallow, very superficial. I would like to see a much tougher, more in-depth inquiry. … I would like to see someone in a position of authority ask those questions and insist on getting answers, at least to why some of the things that happened that seem to be, for an ordinary person, inexplicable. … We have to try and get the truth. … I hope that somebody has the courage and persistence to keep at it until we get it." http://www.septembereleventh.org/... http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/movies/Hellyer.mov
Andreas von Buelow, PhD "The official story is so inadequate and far-fetched that there must be another one." http://video.google.com/... "The planning of the attacks was technically and organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with complicated flight maneuvers! This is unthinkable, without years-long support from secret apparatuses of the state and industry." http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.... http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
Michael Meacher - Former Under Secretary for Industry, Under Secretary for Health and Social Security, Minister for the Environment, and Member of the House of Commons (Parliament) (UK). "It [9-11 Commission Report] was a 580-page avoidance of any serious explanation. … The official investigative report says the US has never been able to find the sources of financing for 9/11. And then they say this "That after all is a matter of no great importance." I find that astonishing. It is a matter of absolutely central importance. So there was a very great deal of evidence. And it seems to me extraordinary that the United States with its stupendous military capabilities and the most technologically advanced country in the world completely and totally failed to follow up on these leads." http://video.google.com/... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8274552561914055825
General Leonid Ivashov - Former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces on 9/11/2001, and Department Chief for General affairs in the Soviet Union's Ministry of Defense. "Only secret services and their current chiefs - or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations - have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude." http://www.physics911.net/ivashov.... http://www.physics911.net/ivashov.htm
Mohamed Hassanein Heikal - Former Foreign Minister of Egypt. "Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for an operation of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I laugh because I know what is there. Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organisation and sophistication." http://www.guardian.co.uk/... http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4273924,00.html
David Shayler - Counter-Terrorism Officer, MI5 (Britain) "The available evidence indicates that people in key positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid down by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would shock the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the middle East, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq."http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974
_____________________
Letter to Congress regarding the 9/11 Commission Report, signed by the following 25 military, intelligence, and security veterans: "[W]e the undersigned wish to bring to the attention of the Congress and the people of the United States what we believe are serious shortcomings in the [9/11 Commission] report and its recommendations. … Omission is one of the major flaws in the Commission’s report. We are aware of significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the commission by those of us with direct knowledge, but somehow escaped attention. …The omission of such serious and applicable issues and information by itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity of many of its recommendations."
Edward J. Costello, Jr., Former Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBIJohn M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBIDavid "Mark" Conrad, Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. CustomsRosemary N. Dew, Former Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence, FBIBogdan Dzakovic, Former Red Team Leader, FAA (See also individual quote above.) Sibel D. Edmonds, Former Language Specialist, FBI Steve Elson, Retired Navy Seal and Former Special Agent, FAA and US NavyDavid Forbes, Aviation, Logistics and Govt. Security Analysts, BoydForbes, Inc.,Melvin A. Goodman, Retired Senior Analyst/ Division Manager and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy, CIA (See also individual quote above.)Mark Graf, Former Security Supervisor, Planner, and Derivative Classifier, Department of EnergyGilbert M. Graham, Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence, FBIDiane Kleiman, Former Special Agent, US CustomsLt Col Karen U. Kwiatkowski, Veteran Policy Analyst, U.S. Air Force-DoD (See also individual quote above.)Lynne A. Larkin, Former Operation Officer, CIADavid MacMichael, Former Senior Estimates Officer, CIARaymond L. McGovern, Veteran Analyst, CIA (See also individual quote above.)Theodore J. Pahle, Senior Intelligence Officer (Ret), Defense Intelligence Agency, Office of Naval Intelligence, and U.S. Army IntelligenceBehrooz Sarshar, Retired Language Specialist, FBIBrian F. Sullivan, Retired Special Agent and Risk Management Specialist, FAALarry J. Tortorich, Retired US Naval Officer, US Navy and Dept. of Homeland Security/TSAJane A. Turner, Retired Special Agent, FBIJohn B. Vincent, Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBIDr. Fred Whitehurst, Retired Supervisory Special Agent/Laboratory Forensic Examiner, FBICol. Ann Wright, Retired Reserve Colonel and Former US Diplomat, US Army,Matthew J. Zipoli, Special Response Team (SRT) Officer, DOE
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Whilimena. Make your own badge here.
Contact/support Whilimena
------------ rae@dr.com
Tele: 004 918 010 206 502776 (Ger.)
Email: rae@dr.com
____________________
Whilimena welcomes you to the terror tracker site!
"I would like to make a suggestion to the Tribunal adjudicating the 9-11 suspects: bring the trial into civilian courts because it was mostly civilians who were struck. Allow the Jersey Girls to pose their unanswered questions. Why a Tribunal? If we did not cooperate with the criminals, then they should have absolutely no secrets to divulge!" Whilimena
________________
"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned. They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official "investigations" have really been cover-up operations. Thus far, however, there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or, for that matter, in other capitals around the world. Our organization, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, has been formed to help bring about such a response. We believe that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administration’s interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed. We are, therefore, calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 that takes account of evidence that has been documented by independent researchers but thus far ignored by governments and the mainstream media." Rep. Peter H. Allen, PhD
_____________________ The Hidden History of 9-11 By Paul Zarembka
"How much insider trading occurred in the days leading up to 9/11? How compromised is the evidence against alleged hijackers because of serious authentication problems with a key Dulles Airport videotape? To what extent does the testimony of more than five hundred firefighters differ from official reports of what happened at the World Trade Center buildings that day? How inseparably connected are Western covert operations to al-Qaeda? How is Islamophobia used to sustain US imperialism?"
Paul Zarembka is a professor of economics at the State University of New York at Buffalo. Since 1977, he has been the general editor for Research in Political Economy. He has authored Toward a Theory of Economic Development, edited Frontiers in Econometrics, and co-edited Essays in Modern Capital Theory. _____________________
"We have pacified some thousands of the islanders and buried them; destroyed their fields; burned their villages, and turned their widows and orphans out-of-doors; furnished heartbreak by exile to some dozens of disagreeable patriots; subjugated the remaining ten millions by Benevolent Assimilation, which is the pious new name of the musket; we have acquired property in the three hundred concubines and other slaves of our business partner Sultan of Sulu, and hoisted our protecting flag over that swag. And so, by the Providences of God - and the phrase is the government's, not mine - we are a World Power". Mark Twain __________
"Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." Menachem Begin
"You know we laugh about the six million story, just like the story that Christ was a Jew, and the God's Chosen People story." Harold Wallace Rosenthal _____________ "Your heroes are not who you think they are..." Corbett Report ____________ "I wish very much that the 'wrong people' could be prevented entirely from breeding." Theo Roosevelt ___________
"We always hear fools say that we should have free speech. But guess what? They mean free speech for themselves only - that which propagates their opinions." Whilimena ______________ "The words of Washington's al Qaeda associates have already defiled them. These thugs are barefaced and vicious. They kept those two towers up for a length of time so that Americans could witness the "spectacular" event as they had originally warned. Never in the history of criminal activities have there been so many admissions to committing the September 11th caper; yet not a single culprit apprehended. These Washington al Qaeda boys knew that they could not hoodwink all the Military personnel so they organized war games as subtle tricks, and then they sent the Military intercepters on wildgoose chases to Canada and the Atlantic. al Qaeda stand up! The handcuffs are next!" Whilimena ______________________ "Have you ever seen a group of persons chasing a thief with the intention to kill him? Chances are that the chasers are crooks too! Was the Cheney Administration hunting al Qaeda 9-11 operatives and having them 'done in' because they attacked the United States, or was the plan to eliminate those participants of the caper who could expose the truth about the 9-11 plot? If it was a plan to eliminate the attackers because of what they did on 9-11, then why do it in secret? I believe that Big Dick and his associates were eliminating those capable of identifying the major planners of the 'spectacular attack' "
"CIA abduction programme: 'Dick Cheney wanted to keep plans a secret' Former vice-president Dick Cheney ordered a plan to send CIA squads abroad to track down al-Qaida leaders to be kept secret from Congress. Chris McGreal reports from Washington." http://www.blogger.com/www.guardian.co.uk ___________________ Then They Came for Me by Stephen F. Rohde, Esq. "First they came for the Muslims, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Muslim. Then they came to detain immigrants indefinitely solely upon the certification of the Attorney General, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't an immigrant. Then they came to eavesdrop on suspects consulting with their attorneys, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a suspect. Then they came to prosecute non-citizens before secret military commissions, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a non-citizen. Then they came to enter homes and offices for unannounced "sneak and peek" searches, and I didn't speak up because I had nothing to hide. Then they came to reinstate Cointelpro and resume the infiltration and surveillance of domestic religious and political groups, and I didn't speak up because I had stopped participating in any groups. Then they came for anyone who objected to government policy because it aided the terrorists and gave ammunition to America's enemies, and I didn't speak up because...... I didn't speak up. Then they came for me....... and by that time no one was left to speak up." _____ Stephen Rohde, a constitutional lawyer and President of the ACLU of Southern California, is indebted to the inspiration of Rev. Martin Niemoller (1937). ______________________
9-11 MOSSAD agents
The Whilimena toolbar
Download the TOOLBAR to your computer, then restart your browser and click on 'WHILIMENA'
__________________________
Legendary quotes (Including the infamous Canary Mouths)
"If the people knew what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." George H.W. "Poppy" Bush
_____________
"There are things that we know we know; things we know that we don't know, and things that we don't know that we do not know." Donald 'The Great Rummy' Rumsfeld
_____________
"It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them." Donald The Great Rummy Rumsfeld _____________
'...I would just mention that General Myers and Paul Wolfowitz have been intimately involved in the work of the Department prior to September 11th, on September 11th and subsequent to September 11th... How many countries would have joined [without 9-11]? Any? Not likely... We would have heard objections to preemption similar to those voiced before the coalition launched Operation Iraqi Freedom. We would have been asked, 'How could you attack Afghanistan when it was al Qaida that attacked us, not the Taliban?' 'How can you go to war when countries in the region don't support you?' 'Won't launching such an invasion actually promote terrorist attacks against the United States?'... Unfortunately history shows that it can take a tragedy like September 11 to waken the world to new threats and to the need for action... During the course of the day, [September 11] the President indicated he expected us to provide him with robust options for military responses to that attack... A 90-nation coalition is a big thing... Someone asked me if Osama bin Laden is masterminding all of this...there were a number of reports about potential hijacking... I didn't say we didn't know. I said I didn't know... we began the process quite quickly of making changes to the standing rules of engagement, Dick Myers and I did, and then issuing that...' Donald H. "Rummy" "Canary Mouth" Rumsfeld (Testimony to the Kean Commission) _____________ "...we were currently one of the first teams that was deployed to the city of NY for this disaster. We arrived late Monday [September 10] Night and went into action on Tuesday morning [September 11]." Tom Kenny (FEMA Official) _____________ "I have information about things that our government has lied to us about… those things can be proven as lies, very easily, based on the information they classified in my case, because we did carry very intimate relationship with these people, and it involves Central Asia, all the way up to September 11..." Sibel Edmonds --- Whilimena: "If Osama bin Laden was Agent Osman up until September 11th - then Washington political fellows must tell us about their involvement in the 9-11 crime." __________ Who was the TOP DOG? "...I was in a position to be able to see all the stuff coming in, receive reports and then make decisions in terms of acting with it..." Big Dick Cheney _____________ Folks bear in mind that 3000 people were murdered in the worst incident in US history. The alleged government at the time did not initiate an investigation. Remarkable, isn't it? The 'Commissioner' of the investigation Thomas H. Kean did not think that there would be a hearing with out a few widows' urging: "I doubt very much if we would be in existence without them [The Jersey Girls]" So folks let us put a little commonsense into place and ponder who could have murdered those 3000. Whilimena _____________ "After reviewing the facts regarding 9-11 - the whitewashed Commission Report; stonewalling, suppression of evidence; bogus evidence (like the engines which fell on New York streets, the plane that went through a 16 foot hole at the pentagon and the 20 foot hole in Shanksville, and the hijacker's passport which fell in New York street); fabricating and tampering with evidence; the appropriate name for the 9-11 investigation is Nuremberg II." Whilimena _____________ "...sometime in the next two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve months there would be an event that would occur in the world that would be sufficiently shocking that it would remind people again how important it is to have a strong healthy defense department that contributes to -- that underpins peace and stability in our world." Donald Rumsfeld "...we adjourned the meeting, and I went in [while the attacks took place] to get my CIA briefing." Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense "I’m quite sure it was a plane and I’m pretty sure it’s a large plane." Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense (September 11, 2001) _____________ "What did you [Poppy Jr.] do? Nothing, as far as we can see." Bob Kerry _____________ "[9-11 Commission hearing] It's a scam." Max Cleland _____________ "I felt that the fix was in." Betty Casazza (Member of the Jersey Girls) _____________
"The process of transformation," the plan said, "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor." PNAC ________ "It was an interesting day."—President Bush, recalling 9/11 White House (1/5/02) ________ "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today…. We think it’s Osama bin Laden." Poppy Jr's Note in Diary on September 11, 2001; Washington Post (1/27/02) _____________ Perfect patsy:
STATEMENT OF CAPT CHARLES J. LEIDIG, JR. COMMANDANT OF MIDSHIPMEN UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES 17 JUNE 2004 Approximately two months prior to 11 September 2001, I assumed duties as the Deputy for Command Center Operations in the J3 Directorate of the Joint Staff. In this role, I was responsible for the maintenance, operation, and training of watch teams for the National Military Command Center (NMCC). Further, I qualified in August 2001 to stand watch as the Deputy Director for Operations in the NMCC. On 10 September 2001, Brigadier General Winfield, U. S. Army, asked that I stand a portion of his duty as Deputy Director for Operations, NMCC, on the following day. I agreed and relieved Brigadier General Winfield at 0830 on 11 September 2001. Shortly after assuming duty, I received the first report of a plane’s striking the World Trade Center. Some time after, I learned of the second plane’s collision with the World Trace Center. In response to these events, I convened a Significant Event Conference, which was subsequently upgraded to an Air Threat Conference. During the Air Threat Conference, Brigadier General Winfield relieved me and reassumed duties as Deputy Director for Operations for the National Military Command Center. The details of the Air Threat Conference are contained in the conference transcript. I was given the opportunity to review this transcript during testimony I gave to members of The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States staff on 29 April 2004. On that date, I recounted my actions as Deputy Director for Operations, NMCC, on 11 September 2001. _____________
Air Force officer disciplined for saying Bush allowed September 11 attacks Hijacker attended US military school http://www.wsws.org/tools/index.php?page=print&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsws.org%2Farticles%2F2002%2Fjun2002%2Foffi-j21.shtml By Jerry Isaacs21 June 2002 A US Air Force officer in California recently accused President Bush of deliberately allowing the September 11 terror attacks to take place. The officer has been relieved of his command and faces further discipline. The controversy surrounding Lt. Col. Steve Butler’s letter to the editor, in which he affirmed that Bush did nothing to warn the American people because he "needed this war on terrorism," received scant coverage in the media. Universally ignored by the press, however, was that the officer was not merely expressing a personal opinion. He was in a position to have direct knowledge of contacts between the US military and some of the hijackers in the period before the terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center and damaged the Pentagon. Lieutenant Colonel Butler, who wrote in a letter to the editor of the Monterey County Herald charging that "Bush knew about the impending attacks," was vice chancellor for student affairs at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California—a US military facility that one or more of the hijackers reportedly attended during the 1990s. In his May 26 letter to the newspaper, Butler responded to Bush supporters, who had written the paper opposing the congressional investigation into the September 11 events. He wrote: "Of course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed Osama. His presidency was going nowhere. He wasn’t elected by the American people, but placed in the Oval Office by a conservative supreme court. The economy was sliding into the usual Republican pits and he needed something on which to hang his presidency.... This guy is a joke. What is sleazy and contemptible is the President of the United States not telling the American people what he knows for political gain." The letter provoked immediate retaliation against the 24-year Air Force veteran. Butler was transferred from the Monterey installation and threatened with court martial under Article 88 of the military code, which prohibits officers from publicly using "contemptuous words" against the president and other officials. Last week the Air Force announced it had concluded its investigation of the case and suggested Butler would likely face "nonjudicial punishment," such as a fine or a letter of reprimand, rather than a stiffer sentence. If he refuses this punishment, however, Butler, who is ready to retire, could still face a court martial. The issue is a particularly sensitive one for the Pentagon and the Bush administration. While many people believe that the Bush administration viewed September 11 as a priceless opportunity to implement an ultra-reactionary program of militarism and repression, Butler is different. His military assignment brought him into contact with at least one of the alleged hijackers. Shortly after September 11, several US news outlets reported that Saeed Alghamdi—named as taking part in the hijacking of United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed in western Pennsylvania—had taken courses at the Defense Language Institute, the US military’s primary foreign language facility, where Butler was a leading officer overseeing students (essentially, dean of students). Alghamdi, a 41-year-old Saudi national, was one of several alleged hijackers, including accused ringleader Mohamed Atta, who reportedly trained at US military facilities, according to a series of articles published between September 15 and 17 in the Washington Post, Newsweek magazine, the New York Times and several other newspapers. On September 15, Newsweek reported: "U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes used in Tuesday’s terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s." The magazine said that Saeed Alghamdi was among three who had taken flight training at the Navy Air Station in Pensacola, Florida—known as the "cradle of US Navy aviation"—which also administers training of foreign aviation students for the Navy. The magazine, citing "a high-ranking Pentagon official" as its source, reported that two others—both former Saudi air force pilots who had come to the US—also attended such facilities. One received tactical training at the Air War College in Montgomery, Alabama and the other language training at the Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas. Over the next few days, more detailed information appeared in several other newspapers. A September 16 article in the New York Times reported: "Three of the men identified as the hijackers in the attacks on Tuesday have the same names as alumni of American military schools, the authorities said today. The men were identified as Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi. "The Defense Department said Mr. Atta had gone to the International Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama; Mr. al-Omari to the Aerospace Medical School at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas; and Mr. al-Ghamdi to the Defense Language Institute at the Presidio in Monterey, Calif." The Knight Ridder news service also reported that Saeed Alghamdi had been to the Defense Language Institute in Monterey and the Associated Press cited Air Force sources indicating that more than one of the hijackers may have received language training at the installation. The media dropped the story after the Air Force officials issued a cursory statement aimed at preventing any further inquiry into links between the US military and the terrorists. While acknowledging that some of the suspected terrorists "had similar names to foreign alumni of U.S. military courses," the statement said discrepancies in biographical information, such as birth dates and name spellings, "indicate we are probably not talking about the same people." Without providing any substantiation, the statement suggested the hijackers may have stolen the identities of foreign military personnel who received training at the bases. Following this less than convincing explanation, the Air Force refused to release the ages, countries of origin or any other information about the individuals whose names matched those of the alleged hijackers—making it virtually impossible to verify the claim that these were not the same individuals. Attorney General John Ashcroft and the FBI also refused to make public any information. Asked by Florida Senator Bill Nelson whether any of the hijackers were trained at the Pensacola base, the Justice Department refused to give a definitive answer, and the FBI said it could not respond until it could "sort through something complicated and difficult," according to the senator’s representative. To receive such training, the hijackers would have had connections to Arab governments that enjoyed close relations with the US government. A former Navy pilot at the Pensacola air station told Newsweek that during his years on the base, "We always, always, always trained other countries’ pilots. When I was there two decades ago, it was Iranians. The Shah was in power. Whoever the country du jour is, that’s whose pilots we train." Military officials acknowledged that the US has a longstanding agreement with Saudi Arabia to train pilots for the kingdom’s national guard. Candidates receive air combat training and other courses on several Army and Navy bases, in a program paid for by Saudi Arabia. Significantly 15 of the 19 hijackers were believed to be Saudi nationals. According to its web site, the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center in Monterey—founded in 1946 as the Military Intelligence Service Language School—"provides foreign language services to Department of Defense, government agencies and foreign governments" to support "national security interests and global operational needs." As vice chancellor for student affairs, Butler had extensive contact with students, according to Pete Randazzo, a close associate of the officer and president of the National Association of Government Employees Local 1690, which represents civilian employees at the language school. "He would go and have lunch with the students, sit in their classrooms. He was a very caring officer over there," Randazzo told the Herald. Butler was also navigator of a B-52 bomber during the Persian Gulf War, which made it likely he was familiar with Saudi military operations, given the close relations between the US and Saudi Arabia during the 1990-91 war against Iraq. In the 1990s, several officers were disciplined under Article 88 of the military code for publicly denouncing Clinton, including an Air Force general who went so far as to ridicule the president as a "gay-loving, pot-smoking, draft-dodging womanizer" in front of 250 people at an awards banquet. With Butler’s comments, however, the Pentagon faces a more delicate problem. The Lieutenant Colonel may well know considerably more than he is saying about US military-intelligence apparatus involvement in the September 11 events, and, on the eve of his retirement, took the opportunity to set the record straight. _____________ "The truth is, they [Enterprize] did know [about the 9-11 attacks]." Bogdan Dzakovic, Former Team Leader, FAA ____________________ Norman Mineta: "During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President [Big Dick Cheney]...'the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out'....and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president 'do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said 'Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary?' " _____________
"... the Middle East with two thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies..." Dick Cheney, Chief Executive of Halliburton, now Vice President of the United StatesSpeech at London Institute of Petroleum, Autumn Lunch 1999 _____________
"They were grooming the terrorists for the 9-11 plot." Whilimena
Michael Springman: Well it began in Jeddah when I was repeatedly told to issue visas to unqualified applicants. This went on for quite some time, during most of my tour there. CBC: When you say unqualified applicants, what kind of qualifications didn't they have?
Springman: Under the American immigration laws, you need to demonstrate that you are going to the United States for a specific purpose, and typically in such a situation you are going to sign a business deal, or you're going to go as a tourist to see the Grand Canyon, or you're going as a student to study a particular course of study. And these were people that had no job; in one instance he was a Sudanese, who was unemployed in Saudi Arabia, and a refugee from the Sudan. But he got a visa for National Security purposes, after it was taken out of my hands by the chief of the consular section. The King's barber's secretary apparently got a visa. There were other people in similar situations that really demonstrated no clear idea of what they were going to do. CBC: All right, King's barber's aside, to be the Devil's advocate your superior from time to time overruled your findings. Why is that unusual?
Springman: Well it's unusual because in State department practice, you are supposed to have new concrete and substantive information that was not available to the fellow who adjudicated the visa at the beginning. And this was never done. CBC: So what do you think you were dealing with here; it all sounds a bit like a case of visa fraud perhaps, but why to you think there was anything more than that?
Springman: Well initially I thought that is what it was. There was visa fraud. I had been told by one contact that the price for a visa at the American consulate was the equivalent of $2500 US. But once I got back to the United States, and was out of the foreign service, I ran across a couple of people with ties to the American government, that told me another story; that the CIA was recruiting fighters for the Afghan war against the then Soviets, and that their asset, Osama bin Laden was working with them. They had a recruiting office in Jeddah, they had a recruiting office in Riyadh, and third one somewhere in the Eastern province. And they would send these people to Jeddah, the fifth largest visa issuing post in the Middle East, for visas. They would apparently run these people straight over from their recruiting office over to my visa window. Well obviously, when they were not good solid businessmen, or good upstanding upper class people I would refuse them. CBC: How many would you estimate that got into the United States that shouldn't have through this back door?
Springman: Well, in my case I would say as many as 100. _____________
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." Lucky Larry Silverstein _____________
"I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us." Rudy Giuliani the alleged "America's Mayor" _____________ "We are Constitutionally sworn to protect and defend this Republic against all enemies foreign and domestic. And my friends there are enemies," ... "My message to the American people don’t let Congress seal this deal. High financial crimes have been committed,"... "The normal legislative process has been shelved. Only a few insiders are doing the dealing, sounds like insider trading to me. These criminals have so much political power than can shut down the normal legislative process of the highest law making body of this land," Representative Marcy Kaptur ___________________
"He [Rockefeller] just said there's gonna be an event and out of that event we're gonna invade Afghanistan so we can run pipelines through the Caspian sea, we can go into Iraq to take the oil and establish bases in the middle east and to make the middle east part of the new world order and we're going to go after Venezuela - that's what's going to come out of this event." Aaron Russo, Film Director ____________________ _____________ "We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent." (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate).
_____________ As is typical, the FBI and other agencies were waiting for the event so that they could immediately intimidate witnesses, destroy evidence, and chase away any honest policemen. http://tinyurl.com/3rzytu Here is Sam Danner's story, along with discussions of related subjects (If you don't have the time to listen to the entire interview, there are brief excerpts of important points below this box. Also, check out the information at the bottom of this article.)Sam_EyewitnessToFlight77_hour1.mp3 6.3 mbhttp://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam_EyewitnessToFlight77_hour1.mp3(the phone cut out, and then we continued)Sam_EyewitnessToFlight77_hour2.mp3 9.7 mbhttp://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam_EyewitnessToFlight77_hour2.mp3Note: he had a chemotherapy treatment a few hours earlier, so he was a bit tired.A Few Important ExcerptsSam Danner, who had been an emergency medical technician, was driving near the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.When he was in front of the Pentagon, traffic began to slow down. Danner noticed an airplane in the distance. He knew about the attack on the WTC, and he pulled over and got out of his car. He noticed a small aircraft in the distance coming towards him.However, he also noticed some people on the Pentagon property watching the traffic and the aircraft:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/WhiteCollarPeopleLooking.mp3He saw a second airplane with 4 engines high up in the air above the Pentagon:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/JetHighAbove4Engines.mp3A couple seconds later the first aircraft passes in front of him. He describes it as a white aircraft about the size of Gulfstream 300. The front was like a humpback whale. It was flying very low to the ground:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/HumpbackWhaleOneEngine.mp3There was only one engine, and it was in the tail:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/TailConfigurationOf727.mp3As other witnesses have said, the airplane seemed to be under perfect control. He did not notice any windows on the plane:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/LookedLikeUnderPerfectControlNoWindows.mp3He felt the air move as the aircraft flew by, but the aircraft was amazingly quiet:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/FeltAirVeryQuiet.mp3He saw some of the light poles that had been hit by the aircraft, but they seem to have fallen in the wrong direction, as if explosives knocked them down:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/LightPolesBlownBackwards.mp3Danner walked onto the Pentagon property to help the survivors, but he didn't find any bodies or luggage:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/AskedToHelpPickUpScraps.mp3He joined the people who picked up scraps (see the photo at the top of this page):http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/HorseAndPonyShowNothingToPickUp.mp3One of the other people assumed they were picking up scraps only to make it appear as if they were doing something useful; ie, in order to impress somebody important:HorseAndPonyShowNothingToPickUp.mp3All they found were bits of shredded aluminum and some type of polymer material with fibers:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/RoughOnOneSideWithFibers.mp3He saw tiny bits of aluminum, a few large pieces, and only one engine:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/BitsOfAluminumAndOneEngine.mp3Danner's description of the airplane and the scraps supports the theory that a Global Hawk crashed into the Pentagon. PRIVATE "TYPE=PICT;ALT=http://www.erichufschmid.net/GlobalHawkAtPentagon.JPG"Many people started to wonder what was going on:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/PeopleUpsetConfused.mp3The people who appeared to be official government agents did not seem interested in rescuing victims:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/AgentsDidntSeemToCare.mp3Are you aware that prior to the collapse of Building 7 at the World Trade Center, the people in the area were told to move away because the building might collapse? Well, Danner said that after a while they were told to move away from the Pentagon. Some of the people in the area obviously knew that a portion of the building was about to collapse:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/AgentsToldPeopleToBackAway.mp3Most of the Pentagon employees were as confused about what was happening as Danner, which implies that only a small number of the Pentagon employees were part of this scam. This implies that a lot of Pentagon employees must have figured out that they were lied to:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/LotOfPeopleSuspicious.mp3Danner's testimony shows that there must be thousands of people who know that the official story is a lie, but they don't realize that their information is important, or they are too frightened to talk.The suspicious government agents intimidated the innocent people who wanted to help:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/WeWereIntimidated.mp3He made a sarcastic remark to a government agent about how there was a tremendous loss of life from the airplane crash but he couldn't see any of it:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/AgentsDidntSeemConcerned.mp3Danner's final conclusion was that there was no 757; the official story is a lie:http://www.erichufschmid.net/Sam/No757ItIsBigLie.mp3 _____________
Quotes by "Professor" Poppy Jr. Bush "I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace.""Professor" Bush, June 18, 2002
"Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wis., Oct. 18, 2000
"I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, N.H., Jan. 27, 2000
"I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004
"I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." —Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000
"You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005
"Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004
"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
_____________ "We Will Lead [&Control] Every Revolution Against Us". ~ Zionist Theodor Herzl _____________ An agent of Gladio, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, "You had to Attack civilians, the People, Women, Children, Innocent People, - Unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple — to force...the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security." _____________________ "al Qaeda is prosecuting its members for the 9-11 attacks. Funny how the accused are the ones attempting to label their nemises as terrorists." Whilimena
"Possibly putting someone to death based on evidence obtained through waterboarding, or after prolonged periods of sleep deprivation while being forced into painful stress positions, is not the answer..." Jennifer Daskal, a lawyer for Human Rights Watch ____________________ Penn & Teller: "If you ever see anyone carrying it [a 9-11 conspiracy book] - push them down a flight of stairs." (These two crackpots must have reasons to suggest harming the conspiracy theorist.) ____________________
"These little 9-11 thugs must take us for idiots - thinking or putting forward the farce that a few A-rabs invaded the Military heartbeat of the United States; yet it was and is the element within the Administration of the United States which suppressed and is suppressing data; stonewalled and is stonewalling activities relevant to the investigation of the crime. Hah!" Whilimena
U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11 By ELI LAKEStaff Reporter of the Sun http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465April 10, 2008 WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11 official version." On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, "It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess." Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk, "I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11 truth movement." He added, "Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false flag operation is very strong." The narrative that the attacks from 2001 were a "false flag" operation is a recurring theme in the literature challenging the consensus that 19 Al Qaeda hijackers flew commercial jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. False flag refers to espionage or covert actions taken by one government made to seem like the work of another. The false flag thesis has it that the Bush administration is somehow responsible for the September 11 attacks as a pretext for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Mr. Falk yesterday did not return e-mails and phone calls asking for a comment. But in 2004 he wrote the foreword to the book "The New Pearl Harbor," by David Ray Griffin. Mr. Griffin has posited that such an inside job is the likely explanation for the attacks.
In the preface, Mr. Falk writes, "There have been questions raised here and there and allegations of official complicity made almost from the day of the attacks, especially in Europe, but no one until Griffin has had the patience, the fortitude, the courage, and the intelligence to put the pieces together in a single coherent account." When asked for a comment about the appointment of Mr. Falk, a former American ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton said, "This is exactly why we voted against the new human rights council." A spokesman for the American embassy at the United Nations offered no comment yesterday when asked. A spokeswoman at the United Nations, Nancy Groves, yesterday also declined to comment. "I would not make a comment on how the member states vote on appointments. It is their council, they make their decisions," she said. Mr. Falk's selection to the post as rapporteur has already prompted the government of Israel formally to request that Mr. Falk not be sent to their country. The Israeli press has reported that he may even be barred from entering the country. The deputy permanent representative of Israel to the United Nations in New York, Daniel Carmon said, "We are asking the U.N. not to send him. We cannot agree to Mr. Falk's entrance into Israel in his capacity as the rapporteur." One reason the Israelis are concerned about his appointment is that Mr. Falk has compared Israel's treatment of Palestinian Arabs to the Nazi treatment of Jews in the holocaust. In an April 8 BBC interview, Mr. Falk said he stood by the Israel-Nazi comparison. The national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, issued a statement yesterday saying, "This was clearly a singularly inappropriate choice for this position. Falk's startling record of anti-Israel prejudice should have been enough to preclude him from a position where an unbiased observer is needed to report on the status of human rights in the territories." In a February 16, 1979, op-ed for the New York Times, Mr. Falk praised Ayatollah Khomeini and bemoaned his ill treatment in the American press. He wrote, "The depiction of him as fanatical, reactionary and the bearer of crude prejudices seems certainly and happily false."Nearly nine months later, student followers of Khomeini invaded the American embassy in Tehran and held 52 diplomats hostage for the following 444 days. _____________ Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer’s statement: "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 [570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse."We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!" ____________
From Shareholder: John-Paul Leonard, P.O. Box 126, Joshua Tree, California 92252
Re: Agenda Item 3, Approval of the actions of the members of the Board of Management, I propose that approval not be granted. Re: Agenda Item 4, Approval of the actions of the members of the Supervisory Board, I likewise propose that approval not be granted. Reasoning: The managing and supervisory boards have taken a passive attitude toward the insurance claims and the suspicious aspects of the WTC insurance loss. The investigation of insurance losses and insurance damage claims against the Company is naturally one of the chief duties of the management of every insurance firm. The WTC catastrophe was doubtless one of the biggest insurance incidents in history. A significant portion of the multi-billion dollar loss is expected to be borne by Allianz. Numerous observers and researchers find the WTC case very suspicious. For example, in a public opinion survey, 49.3% of respondents in New York City agreed that "some of our leaders knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act." [Source: http://www.blogger.com/www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855.] When this belief is so widespread among unrelated parties, haven’t the affected insurance companies ever asked whether perhaps the US Government instead of the insurers is responsible for the damages, or whether the possibility of insurance fraud has been investigated? From reports in the media about the trial in New York between the insurers and the insured WTC leaseholder, no sign of such motions has been made public. The dispute has been mainly over the question, whether to pay out $7 billion or "only" $3 billion, whereby the shareholders are supposed to be relieved at the latter sum as a victory of the "lesser of two evils." Nor has there been any lack of critical and analytical voices in Germany. Several books in the last few years have posed sharp questions to the official WTC scenario. In 2003, Deutsche Welle published an article entitled, "9/11 Conspiracy Theory Books Dominate Debate at Frankfurt Book Fair." (http://www.blogger.com/www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,993523,00.html .) Anyone who is interested can quickly obtain similar materials from the Internet free of charge, as well as continuing researches of the background of 9/11 by independent journalists. Two German-American writers, Jim Hoffman (http://www.blogger.com/www.wtc7.net) and Eric Hufschmid, have contibuted greatly to the theory of the dynamiting of the Twin Towers and Building WTC-7. Hufschmid’s work was translated and published in German (http://www.blogger.com/www.painfulquestions.de). They claim that never in history has the structure of a steel building ever been destroyed by fire, and that on the contrary, the evidence points to a controlled demolition. I could find no evidence to gainsay their thesis anywhere. WTC-7, as is well-known, was never struck by airplanes, and photographs of it show only insignificant fires ( http://www.blogger.com/www.globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=523 ). Nevertheless, the 47-story building at WTC 7 suddenly collapsed at around 17:28 on 9/11/2001. This fact was not even mentioned in the report of the official 9/11 commission. (http://www.blogger.com/www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf ) How can an insurer take such an extreme case simply and casually as business as usual? There is plenty more such evidence that would be useful in the billion-dollar lawsuit, which every citizen with an Internet connection can confirm. Why aren’t Allianz (and the other insurers) able to? When the managing and supervisory boards take no action to join the investigation of a case as huge and notorious as the WTC, how are the shareholders to know that other cases, too, for whatever reason, are not paid out without being properly investigated? There is already a private lawsuit against US government officials in connection with the events of 9/11, see http://www.911forthetruth.com/.
September 11, 2001
September 11, 2001 By Whilimena
Ever wonder why the dirty Mossad holds some Washington political tricksters tightly by their b....? The dirty Mossad has secrets which, if revealed, would plunge 'us' into disgrace and utter impecuniousity.
The ultra secret agency has secrets gathered about Pearl Harbor, JFK, MLK, RFK, Waco, Africa, Gander, Flight 800, 9-11 and many more - the Israelis have never forgiven 'us' for 'our' collaboration with the Nazis.
Think it was only German politicians accused of crimes? Imagine that after Hitler and his associates were accused of the Holocaust, a number of Nazis were admitted into the United States.
The dirty Mossad, instead of fighting 'us', they have sought to prey on 'us' like ticks because of the voluminous dossier compiled since 1941.
This means therefore that anything the dirty Mossad requests from Washington, it has to be provided with a smile; and any crime committed by the dirty Mossad must be covered up.
THE 9-11 CHARGES which will not disappear (based on the statute-of-limitations):
(1) Murder of Pentagon staff
(b) Murder of TWC tenants
(c) Murder of passengers in Flight 93
(d) Murder of thousands of US soldiers in Afghanistan
(e) Murder of US soldiers in Iraq
September 11, 2001 was organized by some craftly culprits who saw an opportunity to kill hundreds of birds with a few stones. This caper was the greatest scam since 'courtesanism'. It involved the infamous "Enterprise" boys whose capers can be so easily identified; because, they always use an old plan. All they did in 2001 was to search for a dusted-off operation Zipper and used it on September 11.
This swindle was the most sophisticated, most elaborate, which involved many agencies, and thugs; and the most successful in terms of the loot. The 'war-on-terror' alone has raked in billions. Operation 9-11 included the Pentagon 2.6 trillion dollar swindle; Brady Bonds scam, (Interestingly the Brady Bonds, due September 12, 2001 were underwritten by Cantor Fitzgerald and the paperwork held in the top floor offices of the WTC, all blown up on September 11, 2001. What was the jackpot? The holders of certain instruments did not have to pay.); 70 billion California electricity swindle; WTC gold bullion robbery; numerous WTC, Pentagon, etc.etc., Insurance frauds; destruction of Worldcom and Enron criminal files; Put Options scam; Leo Wanta Money Swindle;War on Terror scam; over 3000 criminal files in WTC 7 alone; and many more.
___
But wait! Not all participants wanted cash only. Some of the thugs want laws to cripple the citizenry's right to free speech. Laws to prevent people from talking about past criminal activities. Why make laws which prevent people from criticizing the Holocaust, for example, when all we have to do is to bring forth solid proof that the incidents under Hitler did occur?
___
Firstly, the alleged plane entering one of the Twin Towers with every single part disappearing into the concrete and steel structure, is basic computer trick. This kind of incident could not occur. It does not matter how many times the 9-11 hoods try to say it did! Imagine the nose of this plane entered and exited through concrete and steel without sustaining significant damage!
The thugs blasted the Twin Towers to 'take out' Cantor Fitzgerald and Aeon companies. Then they blasted the Pentagon to kill those who knew too much, and also to shut down Pentagon defensive capabilities. But wait folks! What if the holes made for the 'planes' to enter the WTC were created by workmen or missiles before the objects entered? WTC workers complained about dust as a result of knocking and drilling of WTC walls prior September 11.
We hear from New York 'finest' that one of the so-called planes was actually a truck painted like a plane! Two men jumped out but Po-lice caught them. Where are they?
Poor John O'Neil, frustrated by the al Qaeda operatives in the Department, he resigned and procured a job arranged by his nemises and later killed on d-day.
___
We suspected foul play when the fools started to exhibit oppositional disorder; that is - opposing every conspiracy theory which surfaced; including vehemently denying that explosives were used to bring down the buildings.
The World Trade Center (Centro Mondiale Comerciale) was constructed based on ideas of Intel Operatives from Permindex, et al; religious con men, and Nostradamus fanatics who saw their retirement benefits in those buildings. The Port Authority advised that there was too much Asbestos in the Towers and so repairs had to be done. Estimates suggested US$1 billion. Lucky and his associates were just ready to lease the buildings and he was so very Lucky that he immediately insured the Towers against terrorism. And guess what? In six weeks "inside terrorists" knocked those buildings down! One should note that years prior 9-11, the tricksters began to mark the WTC as structures that would crumble and fall into the sea as allegedly predicted by Nostradamus. And so, a few weeks before the caper, they consolidated their holdings on the complex and insured it against terrorism, and procured billions. Walla!
You know folks, there was an episode on one major television network when a uniformed officer was given the opportunity on Prime Time television to utter some words never before allowed in the United States media. This 'officer' angry at the carnage of 9-11 said: "bin Laden - kiss my...ass".
Ordinarilly, this sort of comment would be rediculed; but we were all so angry that it was condoned.
Then subsequent to 9-11 we had the slaughter in Iraq and Afghanistan - as former State Department official Lawrence Wilkerson reported, that more than 100 deaths of detainess occurred in US custody. 25 were homicides.
Folks! What if all the carnage and slaughter occurred because some of our own thug citizens orchestrated September 11th?
The local terrorists organized the scam with certain precisions. For example, they groomed a madman Zacharias Moussaoui, to take the fall. As early as the morning of September 11, 2001, the terrorists had a private jet tracking Flight 93, claiming that it was gathering evidence to prosecute Moussaoui. [Incidentally, Flight 93 was stuffed with the bodies of the passengers from the other '9-11' Flights; and was in the air ready to be blown to bits]
"An official for NetJets, a company that sells shares in private business aircraft, confirmed that the plane tracking Flight 93 belonged to the company. The official, who asked not to be identified by name, said the company was asked not to comment on the Sept. 11 flight but would not say who made the request. Sept. 11 video, photos might be shown at Moussaoui trial."
One should note that at the lynching of the said Moussaoui, not one alleged mastermind testified; and also none of these alleged masterminds were allowed to testify elsewhere. Why? Can you imagine the real terrorists putting their masterminds on public trial? The masterminds could expose the whole thing by identifying the insiders who arranged the scam.
9-11 was the beginning of Operation New World Order. A program designed to rule Third World idiots.
9-11 was an operation to test certain missiles, aircraft and weapons like the Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL); stealth technology including the drone and morphing whereby voices of individuals like Mark Bingham could be duplicated.
(Incidentally, on 9-11 several persons were arrested on the scene in New York but those arrests were never heard of in the Moussaoui trial. Why?)
Mossad operatives were arrested with explosives on 9-11. What happen to them?
In fact about 60 Mossad agents were arrested for suspicious activities on and after 9-11. One terrorist on the most wanted list was the man who owned the 'box cutters'; yet he was wisked out of the United States to safe haven in Israel.
Dig this folks! About 90 little thugs were given ID's and placed in the nation's airport system to manipulate the 9-11 scam. These individuals were secretly deported after the caper. Note here carefully, that the exact methodology was applied in the JFK scam. There were numerous false agents in Dealy Plaza 'flashing' badges.
The 9-11 thugs arranged successfully for maximum financial gain. However, the logistics section of the scam left much to be desired.
Some of the most critical mistakes were: (1) The rocket-speed APB on the 19 bush men published by the FBI. This stupid prank was the work of the Dirty MOSSAD. You see, the MOSSAD generally supply some of alQaeda's Washington Bureau fake data. Why? MOSSAD needs to blackmail Washington alQaeda bosses. Frankly, when one publishes such crap regarding such lucid details of 19 bush men within hours of the attacks, even though there was no manifest showing one single name of any of the bush men; it shows how gullible the fbi really is! Also, importantly, the undertakers did not identify any of the bodies of the bush men!! (2) Imagine a plane crashed and burned yet one hyjacker's passport flew out into a Manhattan street in pristine condition. (3) The demolition of Building 7 was the most stupid prank by the terrorists. Building 7 was constructed in 1985 with steel and concrete. It was not as old as the North and South towers; yet it fell in seconds even though only a few pebbles hit it. Who these lunatics trying to fool? (4) The criminal removal of the forensic evidence from the scenes; i.e., WTC metals and the paving of the Pentagon lawn. (5) The suppression of data from investigators of the crime (6) In Shanksville, a 757 with a massive wingspan crashed and left a twenty-feet hole in the ground. How could thugs try to sell that crap? (7) At the Pentagon, a 757 crashed and left a small hole in the building. Photograph shows the building intact after the alleged strike. In fact, unlike Shanksville, the 757 went through a window at the 'Pentagon'. (8) 19 bush men controlled the skies of the United States for two hours under the watch of the alleged most powerful military on the planet. Imagine that NORAD, the SS, and NMCC were all hoodwinked by a few bush men from Afghanistan. Really? (9) Law enforcement officers in New York reported missiles being shot from the Woolworth Building. It appeared that the missiles were creating the holes in the WTC as seen on television. (10) The Great Canary Mouth Rummy, D. H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense confirmed that missiles were used at WTC and the Pentagon.
While the plan exhibited some expertise, there were some real crackpots manning the show. For example, trying to sell the crazy idea that Flight 93 crashed and left a 20 feet hole in the ground; that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon and left a 16 feet hole in the first floor even though the plane was 44 feet high; that a plane flying at 235 feet high knocked down a light pole; that planes crashed and left the wrong engines on the ground; that a silly twin engine novice flew a 757 at 400 miles an hour and performed feat that military pilots could not and cannot do; that 757's crashed and all parts evaporated; and that all the hijackers bodies evaporated and left other passengers' for positive DNA identification; allowing fire to burn for 100 days after planes crashed into the Twin Towers at temperature of over 1300 degrees, allegedly caused by kerosine; claiming that cockpit voice recorder recorded passengers voices and that passenger called his own mother and said: "Mum, this is Mark Bingham." Critically, from the morning of 9-11 the hoods tried to sell the idea that Osama bin Laden committed the crime and swayed the public from other credible evidence.
Immediately after the scam, the thugs planted their twisters to label Osama bin Laden, and they launched a massive eavesdropping campaign to listen in on those who had doubts about the official story.
This was not the first time the Enterprise tapped the phones of Americans. They did it when they murdered John F. Kennedy; and they did it during the seventies. (See CIA, Family Jewels, published in 2007)
Land fill cemetery
al Qaeda thugs burried the people in a landfill and did not allow for proper search by families to conduct proper burials. Why? Well al Qaeda could not afford that! What if John Doe's body from Shanksville turned up at WTC? And what if Jane Doe's body from WTC turned up in Shanksville? What if bodies which were never in the locations described by al Qaeda, turned up in the landfill?
This 9-11 crime warrants a public high grade lynching for the perpetrators broadcast live on all major networks.
____________
There has never been a period when so many news reporters were murdered; including two of the most popular. Those two made statements about demolition of the Towers on September 11th, and so they were targeted and their phones and homes bugged.
Never in the history of the world, did so many bio-chemical scientists die in such short period.
Dig this folks! If it wasn't for a few ladies called 'The Jersey Girls' there would be no investigation into the nation's worst incident.
Question: We heard that some wicked masterminds were caught. Where are they?
NYCFD lost the most firemen in any one incident in the history of Uncle Sam. Why isn't NYCFD launching an investigation into the numerous inconsistences in the Official Bogus Report? Has any top dog wearing fireman's uniform shared in the 9-11 loot?
Subsequent to the 9-11 caper, al Qaeda bosses can do everything that come to their little minds, in the name of 'The War On Terror'.
INCIDENTALLY folks - the capture of the alleged 'masterminds' was not to prosecute them, but rather to silence them. For example, Saddam Hussein and his sons were not taken out because anyone thought they had anything to do with 9-11. They were executed because they knew about the Enterprise's plan as far back as year 2000. The 'war-on-terror' scam originated basically to silence the September 11th accomplices.
Fact! Do you know of the trial of one alleged 'mastermind' who testified in the 9-11 scam?
And hear this! Even if you hear of one testifying he'll be a double made up for the Game
Fact! Anytime the 9-11 thugs start prosecuting the alleged 'masterminds' six to eight years after they were allegedly arrested and held in custody; someone should go to the courtroom and grab the masks off those alleged 'masterminds'; because those who were actually accused, were 'taken out' long ago. They are not alive; including the legendary CIA agent Osama bin Laden.
Folks, any investigator who creates the crap about the 'pancaking' of the Twin Towers should be tried for treason.
Look acrefully at one video where the entire 12 or so floors were blown off into pure dust by explosives. If the top was blown off,what caused the 'pancake'?
I suppose you heard that everyone was confused on 9-11 - that the faa failed to warn al Qaeda about the 'hyjackings' and so the Military could not respond. Hogwash! FAA notified everyone regarding the unfolding events and all of them were listening:
__________________ Subject: FAA statementDate: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:25:12 -0400
[ACTUAL TEXT from 5/22/03 Official FAA Statement follows:] FAA communications with NORAD
On September 11, 2001
Within minutes after the first aircraft hit the World Trade Center, the FAA immediately established several phone bridges that included FAA field facilities, the FAA Command Center, FAA headquarters, DOD, the Secret Service, and other government agencies.The US Air Force liaison to the FAA immediately joined the FAA headquarters phone bridge and established contact with NORAD on a separate line. The FAA shared real-time information on the phone bridges about the unfolding events, including information about loss of communication with aircraft, loss of transponder signals, unauthorized changes in course, and other actions being taken by all the flights of interest, including Flight 77. Other parties on the phone bridges, in turn, shared information about actions they were taking. NORAD logs indicate that the FAA made formal notification about American Flight 77 at 9:24 a.m., but information about the flight was conveyed continuously during the phone bridges before the formal notification.
________________
PRESS RELEASEFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 12/22/07 PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTHhttp://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/ Contact: Robert Balsamoe-mail: pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain United Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder information, consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file and Flight Path Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder (FDR). The data provided by the NTSB contradict observed events in several significant ways: The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests. In May, 2007, members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth received these documents from the NTSB and began a close analysis of the data they contain. After expert review and cross check, Pilots for 9/11 Truth has concluded that the information in these NTSB documents does not support, and in some instances factually contradicts, the official government position that United Airlines Flight 93 created the impact crater as reported, in Somerset County, PA on the morning of September 11, 2001 .According to the US Govt, United Airlines Flight 93 approached Somerset County from the North-Northwest at a high altitude on the morning of September 11, 200 1 . However, many witnesses contradict altitude as well as approach path. Also according to reports, and as the impact crater suggests, United Airlines Flight 93 impacted terrain at an almost vertical 90 degree angle, while the Flight Data Recorder shows a 35 degree angle with up-sloping terrain, further reducing impact angle. The information provided by the US Government does not support reports of United Airlines Flight 93 approach, impact angles, and lack of jet fuel at Somerset Country, PA. Pilots for 9/11 Truth is committed to discovering the truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 . We have contacted both the NTSB and the FBI regarding these and other inconsistencies. To date, they have refused to comment on, correct, refute, retract or offer side-letters that might explain the discrepancies between what they claim are the data extracted from the FDR of United Flight 93 and the events observed. .As concerned citizens and professionals in the aviation industry, Pilots for 9/11 Truth asks, why have these discrepancies not been addressed by agencies within the United States Government? Pilots for 9/11 Truth takes the position that an official government inquiry into these discrepancies is warranted and long overdue. We call upon our fellow citizens to write to their Congressional representatives to inform them of these discrepancies and call for an immediate investigation into this matter. For more information and in depth analysis please visit pilotsfor911truth.org. Members of Pilots For 9/11 Truth at http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html ENCLOSURE: Cover letter of FOIA requests. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/UA93_Press_Release.html
________________
WHO doubt the rediculous official story?
Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 By Alan Miller Official Account of 9/11: “Flawed”, “Absurd”, “Totally Inadequate”, “a Cover-up”January 5, 2008 – Eight U.S. State Department veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. “There is no question in my mind, that there is enough evidence to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of the kind we have not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, releasing a lot of documents,” said Daniel Ellsberg, PhD, in a 2006 interview with Jack Blood. [1]
Dr. Ellsberg is one of many signers of a petition to reinvestigate 9/11. [2] Best known for leaking the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times in 1971, Dr. Ellsberg is a former U.S. State Department envoy to Viet Nam and Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Defense. Another State Department critic of the official account of 9/11 is Col. Ann Wright, who said in a 2007 interview with Richard Greene on the Air America Radio Network, “It's incredible some of these things that still are unanswered. The 9/11 Report -- that was totally inadequate. I mean the questions that anybody has after reading that.” [3] Col. Wright is one of three U.S. State Department officials to publicly resign in direct protest of the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003. She joined the Foreign Service in 1987 and served for 16 years as a U.S. Diplomat, including assignments as Deputy Chief of Mission of U.S. Embassies in Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Afghanistan. She helped reopen the U.S. Embassy in Kabul in December, 2001. She also served for 13 years on active duty and 16 additional years on reserve duty with the U.S. Army. She continued in her interview with Greene: “How could our national intelligence and defense operations be so inept that they could not communicate; that they could not scramble jets; that they could not take defensive action? And I totally agree, I always thought the Pentagon had all sorts of air defense equipment around it; that they could take out anything that was coming at it. And for a plane to be able to just fly low right over Washington and slam into that thing is just -- I mean, you still just shake your head. How in the world could that happen?”Fred Burks, former Presidential interpreter, is another State Department veteran who questions the official account of 9/11 and who signed the petition to reinvestigate. “How is it possible that our military's highly touted missile detection systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense system of the U.S.?,” he asked in an essay. [4]During his 18-year State Department career, Mr. Burks served as interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Dick Cheney and Al Gore, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright and many others. Mr. Burks continued, “An even bigger question is why isn't our media asking these questions? Why isn't our military spending many millions of dollars to find out why military defense systems failed on 9/11? Why is it that the 9/11 commission budget was far less than the budget allotted to the Challenger Disaster or even the Monika Lewinsky affair? Why aren't we, the public, asking these questions and demanding answers?”Melvin Goodman, PhD, is another former State Department employee who signed the petition to reinvestigate 9/11. He served as a Senior Analyst at the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Dr. Goodman also later served as Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs and as Professor of International Security at the National War College, 1986 - 2004. In testimony before a 2005 Congressional briefing on the 9/11 Commission Report, Dr. Goodman said, “I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission. … The final report is ultimately a coverup. I don't know how else to describe it.” [5]Dr. Goodman is currently Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy and Adjunct Professor of Government at Johns Hopkins University. Another former career Foreign Service Officer who questions the official account of 9/11 is Michael Springmann. He is also one of many signers of the petition to reinvestigate 9/11.In a speech at the National Press Club, Mr. Springmann said, “I used to be in charge of the visa section at the CIA's Consulate in Jeddah. ... There for a year and a half I issued visas to terrorists recruited by the CIA and its asset Osama Bin Laden. ... Fifteen of the nineteen people who allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA Consulate at Jeddah.” [6] Michael SpringmannGeorge Kenney During his more than 20 years of U.S. government service, Mr. Springmann worked at both the State Department and the Foreign Commercial Service of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Among his many assignments, Mr. Springman served as Consular Officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where he supervised the issuance of visas.In a later interview with the BBC, Mr. Springmann said, “In Saudi Arabia I was repeatedly ordered by high level State Dept officials to issue visas to unqualified applicants. These were, essentially, people who had no ties either to Saudi Arabia or to their own country. I complained bitterly at the time there. I returned to the US, I complained to the State Dept here, to the General Accounting Office, to the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and to the Inspector General's office. I was met with silence. ... What I was protesting was, in reality, an effort to bring recruits, rounded up by Osama Bin Laden, to the US for terrorist training by the CIA. They would then be returned to Afghanistan to fight against the then-Soviets.” [7] Another State Department veteran publicly questioning the official account of 9/11 is former career Foreign Service Officer, George Kenney, who served as Yugoslav desk officer at the State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. He resigned his commission in 1991 over U.S. policy towards the Yugoslav conflict. He then served as consultant in residence at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Currently he’s a consultant and commentator on foreign affairs and current events. In a commentary after a 2007 interview of David Ray Griffin, PhD, Mr. Kenney said, “We should strive to clearly separate what we know from things we don't. Thus, we have a reasonably high level of confidence that the Establishment conspiracy narrative is absurd. The World Trade Center structures came down through controlled demolition. Flight 93 was shot down over rural Pennsylvania. And whatever it was that hit the Pentagon could not have been Flight 77. Further, whatever his peripheral involvement, the planning and implementation of 9/11 did not originate with Osama bin Laden.” [8] Michael Mennard, PhD, is another U.S. State Department veteran who questions the official account of 9/11 and calls for a new investigation. Among his assignments as a career Foreign Service Officer, Dr. Mennard served as Regional Public Affairs Officer in India.In a statement to this author, Dr. Mennard wrote, “I am concerned about the numerous inconsistencies in the official account of 9/11. I support a new investigation regarding the tragic events of that day, the events leading up to it, and subsequent efforts to ignore the whole matter.” Edward Peck Shortly after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report, a group of over 100 prominent Americans signed a petition [9] urging Congress to immediately reinvestigate 9/11. In addition to six former CIA officials, [10] the signers included Daniel Ellsberg, Melvin Goodman, Fred Burks, Michael Springman (all mentioned above), and Edward Peck.Edward Peck served as Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department. He later served as Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Mr. Peck, a 32-year veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service, also served as U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq (1977 - 1980). The petition stated, in part, “We want truthful answers to questions such as: 1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day? 2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack? 3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?4. Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day? 5. Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?”These questions and many others still remain unanswered three years after the petition was submitted and six years after the terrible events of 9/11. As the statements of these eight U.S. State Department veterans show, the need for a new thorough and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world. Statements questioning the official account of 9/11 and calls for a new investigation by more than 800 credible individuals can be found at http://patriotsquestion911.com/Additional information about prominent skeptics of the official account of 9/11 can be found in the author's other articles on this subject, listed below.
_____________________
Think there are only a few crackpots arguing about the 9-11 scam? Read this:
911 Truth Statement Respected Leaders and Families Launch 9/11 Truth Statement Demanding Deeper Investigation into the Events of 9/11
NEW YORK CITY, NY (Oct. 26, 2004) - http://www.911truth.org/article_for_printing.php?story=20041026093059633 An alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11 today announced the release of the 911 Truth Statement, a call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur. The Statement supports an August 31st Zogby poll that found nearly 50% of New Yorkers believe the government had foreknowledge and "consciously failed to act," with 66% wanting a new 9/11 investigation. Focusing on twelve questions, the Statement highlights areas of incriminating evidence that were either inadequately explored or ignored by the Kean Commission, ranging from insider trading and hijacker funding to foreign government forewarnings and inactive defenses around the Pentagon. The Statement asks for four actions: an immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, Congressional hearings, media analysis, and the formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry. The Statement's list of signatories includes notables spanning the political spectrum, from Presidential candidates Ralph Nader, Michael Badnarik, and David Cobb to Catherine Austin Fitts, a member of the first Bush administration, as well as Washington veterans like Pentagon whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and retired CIA analyst Ray McGovern. Other signers range from peace activists like Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans and Global Exchange's Kevin Danaher to former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq, Edward L. Peck; from environmentalists like Randy Hayes and John Robbins to business leaders such as Paul Hawken and Karl Schwarz, CEO of Patmos Nanotechnologies; from populist journalist Ronnie Dugger to renowned investigative reporter Kelly Patricia O'Meara. The Statement also includes 43 noted authors, including New York Times #1 bestseller John Gray, as well as 18 eminent professors, historians, and theologians. Other notables include five-term Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, singers Michelle Shocked and Michael Franti, and actors Ed Asner and Mimi Kennedy. The Statement was facilitated by 911truth.org, a leading coalition. The organization has also announced a press conference outside of Eliot Spitzer's Manhattan office (corner of Cedar and Nassau) at 2:00PM on Thursday, Oct. 28th where 9/11 family members and victim group representatives will file a formal complaint demanding the first criminal investigation of 9/11 events by the New York Attorney General. The Statement We Want Real Answers About 9/11 On August 31, 2004, Zogby International, the official North American political polling agency for Reuters, released a poll that found nearly half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of those in New York state believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9/11 attacks and "consciously failed" to act. Of the New York City residents, 66% called for a new probe of unanswered questions by Congress or the New York Attorney General. In connection with this news, we have assembled 100 notable Americans and 40 family members of those who died to sign this 9/11 Statement, which calls for immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war. We want truthful answers to questions such as: Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day? Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack? Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren? Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day? Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains? Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bush-appointed judge? How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAA's radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US military? How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent? What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence agencies or heads of state? Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the ringleader of the hijackers? Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in addition to almost all of the questions posed here? Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice? Those who are demanding deeper inquiry now number in the hundreds of thousands, including a former member of the first Bush administration, a retired Air Force colonel, a European parliamentarian, families of the victims, highly respected authors, investigative journalists, peace and justice leaders, former Pentagon staff, and the National Green Party. As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry. Given the importance of the coming election, we feel it is imperative that these questions be addressed publicly, honestly, and rigorously so that Americans may exercise their democratic rights with full awareness. In closing, we pray and hope for the strength to approach this subject with wisdom and compassion so that we may heal from the wounds inflicted on that terrible day.
Signed, Signatories Note: All organizations are mentioned for identification purposes only. Individuals have signed this statement as an act of their own conscience, not to signify organizational endorsement. Virginia Deane Abernethy, Ph.D., anthropologist, author, Population Politics Ed Asner, actor, activist Marshall Auerback, international portfolio strategist for David W. Tice & Associates, Inc. Catherine Austin Fitts, Asst. Secretary of Housing in the first Bush administration Keidi Obi Awadu, aka The Conscious Rasta, talk show host, LIBRadio Michael Badnarik, Libertarian candidate for President Byron Belitsos, publisher, Origin Press, author Planetary Democracy Philip J. Berg, Esquire, former deputy attorney general, Pennsylvania Medea Benjamin, activist, author, co-founder, Global Exchange and Code Pink Dennis Bernstein, investigative reporter, radio host of KPFA's Flashpoints Steve Bhaerman aka Swami Beyondananda, author, political comedian Brad Blanton, Ph.D., psychotherapist, author, Radical Honesty Saniel Bonder, spiritual teacher and author, Great Relief Dr. Robert Bowman, USAF Lt. Col. (Rtd.), founder, Institute for Space and Security Studies John Buchanan, author, candidate for the Republican Party Presidential nomination, 2004 Gray Brechin, Ph.D., author, environmental historian, professor, UC Berkeley Fred Burks, presidential interpreter for Bush, Clinton, Cheney, and Gore Norma Carr-Rufino, Ph.D., author, professor of management, San Francisco State University Angana Chatterji, Ph.D., scholar-activist and professor of anthropology Paul Cienfuegos, co-founder, Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County David Cobb, attorney, national presidential candidate, US Green Party John Cobb, Ph.D., theologian, co-author, For the Common Good Ernest Callenbach, founder/editor, Film Quarterly, author, Ecotopia Kevin Danaher, Ph.D., author, speaker, co-founder, Global Exchange Stephen Dinan, author, Radical Spirit Ronnie Dugger, journalist/author, co-founder, Alliance for Democracy Daniel Ellsberg, author, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers Jodie Evans, co-founder, Code Pink Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law, Princeton University Michael Franti, musician, filmmaker, human rights worker Janeane Garofalo, actress, comedienne, talk show host, Air America Radio Jim Garrison, Ph.D., president, State of the World Forum, author, America as Empire Bruce Gagnon, Chair, Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space Ric Giardina, author, consultant, speaker, former Director of Trademarks and Brands for Intel John Gray, Ph.D., #1 bestselling author, Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus Stan Goff, 25-year Army Special Ops veteran, author, Full Spectrum Disorder Melvin Goodman, senior fellow, Center for International Policy, author, former Senior Analyst, CIA, professor, National War College Morton Goulder, Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter David Ray Griffin, Ph.D., theologian, author, New Pearl Harbor Doris "Granny D" Haddock, campaign finance crusader, NH Democratic candidate for Senate Thom Hartmann, radio host; author, Unequal Protection Richie Havens, singer, songwriter, performer, artist Paul Hawken, bestselling author, environmentalist, entrepreneur, founder of Smith & Hawken Randy Hayes, founder, Rainforest Action Network, US National Director, Direction Conservation Richard Heinberg, author, The Party's Over, core faculty, New College of California Van Jones, executive director, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights Rob Kall, editor, OpEdNews.com, president, Futurehealth, Inc. Georgia Kelly, executive director, Praxis Peace Institute Sean Kelly, Ph.D., author, professor of philosophy and religion, CA Institute of Integral Studies John Joseph Kennedy, Democratic Write-in Presidential Candidate for 2004 Mimi Kennedy, actress, Dharma and Greg, progressive activist Faiz Khan, M.D., Triage Emergency Physician on 9/11, Assistant Imam David Korten, author, When Corporations Rule the World Frances Moore Lapp?, author, Diet for a Small Planet; founder, Small Planet Institute Scott M. Legere, 25 year radio broadcaster as Scott Ledger, Tampa FL Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor, TIKKUN Magazine, author, Healing Israel/Palestine Michael Levine, bestselling author of Deep Cover, journalist, 25-year veteran of the DEA Joanna Macy, Ph.D., eco-philosopher, author Enver Masud, founder, The Wisdom Fund, author, The Truth About Islam John McCarthy, former Special Forces Captain, president, Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, co-founder, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity Cynthia McKinney, five-term Congresswoman from Georgia Ralph Metzner, Ph.D., author, professor, co-founder, Green Earth Foundation Mark Crispin Miller, media critic, author, professor, New York University Joseph W. Montaperto, New York City Fire Department Leuren Moret, geoscientist, radiation specialist, environmental commissioner Ralph Nader, Independent candidate for President Craig Neal, author, co-founder, The Heartland Institute, former publisher, Utne Reader Jeff Norman, executive director, Tour of Duty Jenna Orkin, Esquire, World Trade Center Environmental Organization Kelly Patricia O'Meara, investigative journalist, public relations Michael Parenti, Ph.D., author, Superpatriotism and The Terrorism Trap Edward L. Peck, former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq, former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism Peter Phillips, Ph.D., professor, Sonoma State University, director, Project Censored Henri Poole, Internet pioneer, board member, Free Software Foundation Robert Rabbin, author, speaker, creator of TruthForPresident.org Paul H. Ray, Ph.D., sociologist, author, The Cultural Creatives John Renesch, business futurist, author, Getting to the Better Future John Rensenbrink, professor emeritus, Bowdoin College, co-founder, US Green Party John Robbins, author, founder, EarthSave International William Rodriguez, 9/11 rescue effort hero, founder, Hispanic Victims Group Neal Rogin, Emmy-award winning writer, performer, social observer Allen Roland, Ph.D., psychotherapist, published author and peace activist Rosemary Radford Ruether, professor of feminist theology, Graduate Theological Union Michael Ruppert, publisher/editor, From The Wilderness, author, Crossing the Rubicon Chris Sanders, founder, Sanders Research Associates Karl W. B. Schwarz, President, CEO, Patmos Nanotechnologies, LLC Peter Dale Scott, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, author, Drugs, Oil, and War Firefighter Kevin Shea, FDNY Hazmat Operations Michelle Shocked, singer/songwriter, activist Indira Singh, risk management and computer systems consultant J. Michael Springmann, attorney, former Foreign Service Officer, US Department of State Douglas Sturm, Ph.D., university professor emeritus, Bucknell University Marjorie Hewit Suchocki, Ph.D., theologian, author Chuck Turner, Boston City Council James W. Walter Jr., venture investor, philanthropist, founder of Walden Three Dan Whaley, E-commerce pioneer, founder of GetThere.com, acquired for $750M Burns H. Weston, J.S.D., Professor of Law Emeritus, Director, Center for Human Rights, U-Iowa Howard Zinn, professor, historian, author, A People's History of the United States Family Members Joanne Barbara, wife of FDNY Asst. Chief of Dept. Gerard Barbara Gayle Barker, sister of William A. Karnes, WTC Michele Bergsohn, wife of Alvin Bergsohn, Cantor Fitzgerald Derrill Bodley, father of Deora Bodley, passenger on Flight 93 Kathryn C. Bowden, sister of Thomas H. Bowden, Jr. WTC1, 104th floor Janet Calia, wife of Dominick Calia, Cantor Fitzgerald, WTC1 Maggie Cashman, wife of William Joseph Cashman, United Flight 93 Lynne Castrianno Galante, sister of Leonard Castrianno, 1WTC, 105th floor Elza Chapa-McGowan, daughter of Rosemary Chapa, Pentagon Bruce De Cell, father-in-law of Mark Petrocelli North Tower, 92nd floor Ralph D'Esposito, father of Michael D'Esposito, WTC, 96th floor Loisanne Diehl, Surviving Spouse, Michael D. Diehl, WTC2, 90th floor Adina D. Eisenberg, sister of Eric Eisenberg, WTC Jonathan M. Fisher, son of Dr. Gerald Paul "Geep" Fisher, Pentagon Michael J. Fox, brother of Jeffrey L. Fox, Tower 2, 89th floor Laurel A. Gay, sister of Peter A. Gay, AA Flight 11 Irene Golinsky, wife of Col. Ronald F. Golinski USA RET, Pentagon Lori, Jerry, and Beatrice Guadagno, sister and parents of Richard Guadagno, Flight 93 Kristen Hall, daughter of fallen firefighter Thomas Kuveikis 9/11 Kurt D. Horning, father of Matthew D. Horning, WTC Tower One, 95th floor Jennifer W. Hunt, wife of William C. Hunt, Euro Brokers John Keating, son of Barbara Keating, passenger on AA Flight 11 L. Russell Keene II, father of Russ Keene III, WTC2, 89th floor, KBW Peter Kousoulis, sister died in WTC Paul & Barbara Kirwin, parents of Glenn Davis Kirwin, Cantor Fitzgerald 105th floor Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli, mother of William E. Krukowski, NYC firefighter Laura and Ira Lassman, parents of Nicholas C. Lassman, died in WTC, Tower One Johnny Lee, husband of Lorraine Greene Alicia LeGuillow, mother of Nestor A. Cintron III Francine Levine, sister of Adam K. Ruhalter, who died on 9/11 Bob McIlvaine, father of Robert McIlvaine, WTC, Merrill Lynch Mary McWilliams, mother of FF Martin E. McWilliams- Engine 22 Daryl J. Meehan, brother of Colleen Ann Barkow, WTC 1, 105th floor Elvira P. Murphy, wife of Patrick Murphy, WTC 1 Natalee Pecorelli, sister of Thomas Pecorelli of Flight 11 James L Perry, M.D and Patricia J. Perry, parents of John W. Perry, Esq., NYPD Officer 9/11 David Potorti, brother of James Potorti, North Tower, WTC, Marsh & McLennan Terry Kay Rockefeller, sister of Laura Rockefeller, North Tower, WTC Grissel Rodriguez-Valentin, wife of Benito Valentin, WTC1, 94th floor Alissa Rosenberg-Torres, widow of Luis Eduardo Torres, post-9/11 mother, writer Elaine Saber, mother of Scott Saber Julie Scarpitta, mother of Michelle Scarpitta, WTC Building 2, 84th floor Paula Shapiro, mother of Eric Eisenberg, WTC2 Elizabeth Turner, wife of Simon Turner, lost on 11th September 2001 Adele Welty, mother of Firefighter Timothy Welty, FDNY, Squad 288 Joan W. Winton, mother of David Winton, WTC, South Tower, 89th floor David Yancey, husband of Vicki Yancey, American Airlines Flight 77 Nissa Youngren, daughter of Robert G. LeBlanc, flight 175 Late Signatories (starting toward 200...) Rita M. Haley, President, National Organization for Women, New York Chapter Immortal Technique, Harlem-based hip-hop artist with Viper Records, Revolutionary I&II Bob Kirkconnell, served in the U.S. Air Force 27 years, reaching the rank of Master Sergeant Dennis Kyne, former Army air medic, 18th Airborne Corps during Gulf War I, musician, author, "Support the Truth" Paul Landis, author, "Stop Bush Now!" Eric H. May, former Army military intelligence officer and media essayist Charles Shaw, Editor, Newtopia Magazine, National Peace Action Coordinator, National Green Party Peter Erlinder, professor, William Mitchell College of Law, past-President National Lawyers Guild Daniel Robert Rezac, 2004 Vice-Presidential Write-In Candidate, former Aviator & Armor Officer, Army National Guard, B.S.B.A. Joel Horwitz, lost beloved cousin in WTC 1 Jessica Murrow, lost husband Stephen Adams, Beverage Manager, Windows on the World, WTC 1 Ellen Mariani, lost husband Neil on Flight 175 Jean Hunt, disabled survivor of Pentagon attack Ralph & Brigitte Sabbag, lost son Jason in WTC 2 Take action!
_____________________
September 2006, 0931 Der erbitterte Streit um den 11. The bitter dispute over 11 September In den USA, aber auch in der Schweiz werden immer wieder bohrende Fragen gestellt zu den Terroranschlägen vom 11. In the U.S., but also in Switzerland are always bohrende questions on the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 (9/11) und den dadurch ausgelösten Kriegen in Afghanistan und im Irak. September 2001 (9 / 11) and thereby triggered wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Von Daniele Ganser* From Daniele Ganser * Im Irak-Krieg gehe es nicht um Terrorbekämpfung, sondern in erster Linie um die Kontrolle der weltweit abnehmenden Vorräte an Erdöl und Erdgas, ist der Amerikaner Fadel Gheit, ehemals Manager beim Erdölkonzern ExxonMobil, überzeugt. The Iraq war is not going to fight against terrorism, but primarily for control of the world's dwindling stocks of oil and natural gas, is the American Fadel Gheit, a former manager at the oil group ExxonMobil, is convinced. «Unsere Lebensweise in den USA setzt täglich 20 Millionen Barrel voraus, von denen die Hälfte importiert werden muss. "Our life in the USA is 20 million barrels a day ahead, half of which were imported. Wir gleichen einem Patienten auf Erdöldialyse», so Gheit. We match a patient on oil dialysis, "says Gheit. «Hier geht es um Leben und Tod.» "This is about life and death." Saddam Hussein, der gestürzte Diktator des Irak, trage entgegen den Behauptungen von Vizepräsident Dick Cheney keine Verantwortung für 9/11 und habe auch keine Atombombe angestrebt, protestiert Scott Ritter, ehemals Uno-Inspektor im Irak. Saddam Hussein, the dictator of Iraq gestürzte, wearing contrary to the assertions by Vice President Dick Cheney not responsible for 9 / 11 and have no atomic bomb sought protested Scott Ritter, former UN inspector in Iraq. «Uns werden eine Menge Lügen erzählt, und die Medien folgen blind und wiederholen diese Lügen. "We are a lot of lies told, and the media follow blindly and repeat these lies. Die Bush-Regierung hat die Daten manipuliert, um die Invasion des Irak zu begründen.» The Bush administration has manipulated the data to the invasion of Iraq to justify. "
Afghanistan diene als Durchgangsland für Erdöl- und Erdgaspipelines vom Kaspischen Meer zum Indischen Ozean sowie als Militärbasis, um den Nahen Osten «unter dem Vorwand der Terrorismusbekämpfung» zu umzingeln, so Michael Ruppert, ehemals Polizist beim Los Angeles Police Departement. Afghanistan serves as a transit country for oil and gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea to the Indian Ocean and as a military base to the Middle East "under the pretext of combating terrorism" to encircle, as Michael Ruppert, a former policeman in the Los Angeles Police Department. Drei Theorien Three theories Die These vom grossen geostrategischen Kampf der Supermächte USA, Russland und China um die schwindenden Erdöl- und Erdgasreserven ist auf den ersten Blick einleuchtend, und nicht zuletzt wegen des steigenden Erdölpreises auch in Europa weit verbreitet. The thesis of great geo-strategic struggle of the superpowers United States, Russia and China by the dwindling oil and gas reserves is at first sight obvious, not least because of rising oil prices also widespread in Europe. Problematisch ist sie trotzdem. The problem is it anyway. Denn sie wirft die fundamentale Frage auf, ob die US-Administration in erster Linie Terroristen oder Erdöl jagt. Because it raises the fundamental question of whether the U.S. administration primarily hunt terrorists or petroleum. Es erstaunt daher nicht, dass der erbitterte Streit in den USA nicht auf die laufenden Kriege im Irak und in Afghanistan beschränkt blieb, sondern auch 9/11 erfasst hat, den mit 2973 Toten grössten Terroranschlag der Geschichte. It is perhaps not surprising that the bitter dispute in the U.S. in the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan remained limited, but also 9 / 11 has collected, with the 2973 deaths biggest terrorist attack in history. In den vergangenen fünf Jahren wurden in den USA verschiedene Filme, Internetseiten und Bücher zu 9/11 veröffentlicht. In the past five years in the U.S. several films, Internet sites and books on 9 / 11. Diese bilden heute eine nur schwer überschaubare Masse von Behauptungen und Gegenbehauptungen. These are now causing a serious manageable mass of allegations and counter allegations. Drei sich gegenseitig ausschliessende 9/11-Theorien stehen sich gegenüber. Three other ausschliessende 9/11-Theorien opposing each other. Alle drei Theorien sind Verschwörungstheorien, obschon ihre Vertreter das gerne negieren. All three theories are conspiracy theories, although their representatives gladly deny. Dies heisst, sie gehen alle von einer geheimen Absprache von zwei oder mehr Akteuren vor dem 11. This means they will lose all of a secret agreement between two or more players before 11 September als gegeben aus. September, as given. Die erste Theorie, die so genannte «Überraschungs-Theorie» (Surprise), stammt von der US-Regierung und wird von der offiziellen amerikanischen Untersuchung - dem «9/11 Commission Report» von Thomas Kean, der im Sommer 2004 erschien - unterstützt. The first theory, the so-called "Surprise theory" (Surprise), comes from the U.S. government and is supported by the official U.S. investigation - the "9 / 11 Commission Report" by Thomas Kean, who appeared in the summer of 2004 - supports. Sie ist die offizielle 9/11-Erzählung: Osama Bin Laden habe zusammen mit Khalid Sheikh Mohammed die Anschläge zuerst in Afghanistan geplant, worauf eine von Mohammed Atta angeführte Gruppe von 19 Muslimen den Terroranschlag in den USA mit vier Flugzeugen ausführte. It is the official 9/11-Erzählung: Osama Bin Laden, along with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the first attacks planned in Afghanistan, as one of Mohammed Atta-led group of 19 Muslims in the terrorist attack in the U.S. with four aircraft said. Bin Laden und sein Netzwerk seien der kriminellen Handlung schuldig. Bin Laden and his network are the criminal act guilty. Die zweite Theorie, die so genannte «Let-It-Happen-on-Purpose-Theorie» («Lass es absichtlich passieren», Lihop), behauptet, Bin Laden und das Al-Qaida-Netzwerk hätten den Anschlag geplant und ausführen lassen. The second theory, called "Let-It-Happen-on-purpose theory" ( "Let it happen deliberately," Lihop), claims that Bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network had planned the attack and run. Teile der US-Regierung hätten dies herausgefunden, den Anschlag aber trotzdem absichtlich nicht abgewehrt und fast 3000 Menschen geopfert, um eine Serie von Kriegen zu legitimieren, von denen jene in Afghanistan und im Irak nur die ersten zwei seien. Parts of the U.S. government had this figured out the attack but deliberately not repulsed and nearly 3000 people sacrificed to a series of wars to legitimize, of which those in Afghanistan and Iraq is only the first two. Sowohl Bin Laden als auch Teile der US-Regierung seien der kriminellen Handlung schuldig. Both Bin Laden as well as parts of the U.S. government are the criminal act guilty. Die dritte Theorie schliesslich, die so genannte «Make-It-Happen-on-Purpose-Theorie» («Führe es absichtlich selbst aus», Mihop), behauptet, die Anschläge seien vom Pentagon und/oder den US-Geheimdiensten ausgeführt worden, die Videos von Bin Laden seien gefälscht. The third theory finally, the so-called "Make-It-Happen-on-purpose theory" (Take it from even intentionally, "Mihop), claimed the attacks were by the Pentagon and / or the U.S. secret services have been, the videos of bin Laden were faked. Fast 3000 Menschen seien kaltblütig geopfert und das eigene Volk und die Welt getäuscht worden, um eine Serie von Kriegen zu legitimieren. Nearly 3000 people were in cold blood and sacrificed their own people and the world has been deceived, a series of wars to legitimize. Teile der US-Regierung seien der kriminellen Handlung schuldig. Parts of the U.S. government are the criminal act guilty. Kevin Barrett, der ein Seminar zum Islam an der University of Wisconsin-Madison unterrichtet, ist ein Mihop-Vertreter, wie er im Juni 2006 öffentlich erklärte. Kevin Barrett, a seminar on Islam at the University of Wisconsin-Madison teaches, is a Mihop representatives, as he said publicly in June 2006. Andere Amerikaner entsetzten sich. Other Americans horrified. Barrett «sei peinlich für die Universität und die Menschen in Wisconsin», so der republikanische Kongressabgeordnete Steve Nass, der zusammen mit anderen Republikanern die Universität aufforderte, Barret sofort zu entlassen. Barrett "is embarrassing for the university and the people in Wisconsin," said Republican Congressman Steve Nass, who together with other Republicans called on the university, Barret immediately dismissed. Der Verwaltungschef der Universität, Patrick Farrell, wehrte sich und betonte die Freiheit in Lehre und Forschung. The administrative head of the university, Patrick Farrell, defended himself and said freedom in teaching and research. «Wir können nicht zulassen, dass politischer Druck von Kritikern unpopulärer Ideen den freien Austausch von Meinungen verhindert», so Farrell. "We can not allow political pressure from critics of unpopular ideas the free exchange of opinions prevented," says Farrell. «Das würde die Tür für noch schwerere und umfassende Einschränkungen öffnen.» Die Studenten seien durchaus in der Lage, abweichende Theorien zu analysieren und sich ihre eigene Meinung zu bilden. "This would be the door for even more severe restrictions on open and comprehensive." Students are perfectly capable, alternate theories to analyze and their own opinion. «Wissen wächst, wenn man über Meinungen streitet», so Farrell. "Knowledge grows when you have opinions dispute," says Farrell. Auch James Fetzer, emeritierter Philosophieprofessor der Universität Minnesota, hält die Surprise-Theorie für Unsinn. Even James Fetzer, a philosophy professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota, holds the Surprise theory nonsense. Er denkt Lihop oder Mihop beschreiben die Wahrheit besser. He thinks Lihop or Mihop describe the truth better. Dafür wurde er wiederholt angegriffen, was ihn und andere Amerikaner aber nicht abschreckt. Instead, he repeatedly attacked what he and other Americans but not deter. «Wir werden das weitermachen», so Fetzer gegenüber CNN. "We will continue," says Fetzer to CNN. «Unsere Rolle ist es herauszufinden, was am 11. "Our role is to find out what, 11 September wirklich passiert ist.» September actually happened. " Debatte in der Schweiz Debate in Switzerland «Es erstaunt mich nicht, dass nach den Schwierigkeiten im Irak und in Afghanistan nun auch um 9/11 gestritten wird», so Kurt Spillmann, emeritierter ETH-Professor für Sicherheitspolitik. "It surprised me, that after the difficulties in Iraq and Afghanistan now also about 9 / 11 argument is," said Kurt Spillmann, ETH professor emeritus for Security Policy. «Man muss aber vorsichtig untersuchen, denn die Lihop- und Mihop-Theorien hätten eine unglaubliche politische Sprengkraft.» "It must be carefully examined, because the Lihop and Mihop theories have an incredible political explosive." Welche Theorien die Schweizer Bevölkerung bevorzugt, ist noch unbekannt. Which theories prefer the Swiss population, is still unknown. «Eine breite Debatte zu diesen drei Theorien ist meines Wissens in der Schweiz noch nie öffentlich und im grossen Stil geführt worden. "A wide debate on these three theories is to my knowledge in Switzerland has never publicly and in style have been. Aber da und dort sind sie immer wieder aufgeflackert», so Professor Karl Haltiner, Leiter der jährlich erscheinenden Erhebungsstudie «Sicherheit» der Militärakademie der ETH. But here and there, they are always aufgeflackert, "says Professor Karl Haltiner, director of the annual survey study" safety "of the Military Academy of ETH. Dass der amerikanische Geheimdienst bei 9/11 die Finger im Spiel hatte, hält «Weltwoche»-Journalist Hanspeter Born für einen «ungeheuerlichen Verdacht», wie er in einem Beitrag zum auch in der Schweiz weit verbreiteten Antiamerikanismus schreibt. The fact that the American secret service in 9 / 11 fingers in the game, believes "World Week journalist Hans Peter Born for a" monstrous suspicion ", as set out in a contribution to Switzerland in the widespread anti-Americanism writes. «Wenn dem so wäre, dann wäre Amerika tatsächlich ein bis ins Innerste verrottetes, krankes Land.» "If so, then America would actually a down to the innermost verrottetes, sick country." Philipp Sarasin, Professor für Geschichte an der Universität Zürich, hat zu den Anthrax-Anschlägen, die auf 9/11 folgten, ein Buch vorgelegt, in dem er die Politik der Angst kritisch hinterfragt und die These vertritt, dass diese Brief-Anschläge möglicherweise ein «Inside-Job» waren. Philipp Sarasin, a professor of history at the University of Zurich, has led to the anthrax attacks on 9 / 11 followed by a book, in which the politics of fear and critically represents the thesis that this letter attacks may be a "Inside Job". 9/11 sei noch völlig ungeklärt: «Welche der drei 9/11-Theorien stimmt, muss durch Historiker weiter untersucht werden», so Sarasin. 9 / 11 was still completely unresolved: "Which of the three 9/11-Theorien true, historians must be further investigated," says Sarasin. «Doch schon heute lässt sich sagen, dass die offizielle Version - ‹Wir hätten uns nie denken können, dass wir durch Zivilflugzeuge angegriffen werden› - zumindest in einem Punkt nachweislich falsch ist: Solche Angriffe wurden seit Jahren als Möglichkeit in Betracht gezogen; im November 2000 wurde gar ein Angriff mit Zivilflugzeugen auf das Pentagon an einem grossen Gebäudemodell geübt.» "But today we can say that the official version - - at least at one point demonstrably wrong: Such attacks have been years as a possibility, in November 2000 was even an attack with civilian aircraft at the Pentagon in a large building model practiced. "
Unter den vielen komplizierten Sachfragen, über die sich die drei Theorien streiten, ist auch World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7). Among the many complicated issues over which the three theories argue, is 7 World Trade Center (WTC 7). Es ist wenig bekannt, dass am 11. It is little known that on 11 September in New York nicht zwei Wolkenkratzer einstürzten - WTC 1 und WTC 2, die bekannten Twin Towers -, sondern drei. September in New York not two skyscrapers einstürzten - WTC 1 and WTC 2, the famous Twin Towers - but three. Beim dritten Gebäude handelt es sich um das 170 Meter hohe WTC 7, das um 17.20 Uhr in sieben Sekunden vollkommen zusammenstürzte. The third building is the 170 meter high WTC 7, the clock at 17.20 seconds in seven zusammenstürzte completely. Misstrauen wegen WTC 7 Mistrust due to WTC 7 In einer Zogby-Umfrage vom Mai 2006 erklärten 43% der Amerikaner, sie hätten noch nie etwas von WTC 7 gehört. In a Zogby poll published on May 2006 said 43% of Americans, they had never been something of WTC 7. Dies vor allem deshalb, weil nur die Twin Towers wiederholt am Fernsehen gezeigt wurden. This is mainly because only the Twin Towers repeatedly shown on television. Verunsicherte 42% erklärten, sie glaubten, die US-Regierung und die 9/11-Untersuchung würden etwas verheimlichen. Verunsicherte 42% said they believed the U.S. government and the 9/11-Untersuchung would conceal something.
«Die Amerikaner sind schlecht und einseitig über 9/11 informiert worden, in erster Linie wurde die Surprise-Theorie auf allen Kanälen verbreitet», so Professor Albert Stahel von der Universität Zürich. "The Americans are bad and unilaterally on 9 / 11 has been informed, primarily Surprise was the theory on all channels disseminated," said Professor Albert Stahel of the University of Zurich. «Das rächt sich nun. "The rächt now. Alternative Medien haben zum Gegenschlag ausgeholt und verbreiten die Lihop- und die Mihop-Theorie. Alternative media have the opposite impact ausgeholt and disseminate Lihop and Mihop theory. Wer gewinnt, wird sich erst in Zukunft zeigen. Whoever wins will in the future. Das Misstrauen gegenüber der Regierung ist gross.» The distrust of the government is great. " «Es gibt ein Problem mit WTC 7», erklärte der Schauspieler Charly Sheen, bekannt aus seinen Rollen in «Platoon» und «Wall Street». "There is a problem with WTC 7," said the actor Charlie Sheen, known from his roles in "Platoon" and "Wall Street". «Und wenn es ein Problem mit WTC 7 gibt, dann gibts ein Problem mit der ganzen 9/11-Geschichte», so Sheen im März 2006 am Radio. "And if there is a problem with WTC 7, it's a problem with the whole 9/11-Geschichte," says Sheen in March 2006 on the radio. WTC 7 könne nicht durch ein Flugzeug zum Einsturz gebracht worden sein, da es gar nie von einem Flugzeug getroffen wurde. WTC 7 could not by a plane has been brought to collapse, because it was never taken from an airplane. Es könne auch nicht durch ein Erdbeben oder den Einsturz der Twin Towers eingerissen worden sein, da zwischen dem Einsturz der Twin Towers und WTC 7 fast sieben Stunden liegen. It can not by an earthquake or the collapse of the Twin Towers eingerissen been, as between the collapse of the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center almost seven hours. Mögliche Ursachen seien nur Feuer oder Sprengung. Possible causes are only fire or explosives.
In der Tat gab es ein kleines Feuer in WTC 7. In fact, there was a small fire in WTC 7th Sheen zweifelt aber, dass dieses Feuer das WTC 7 zum Einsturz brachte. Sheen doubt but that this fire the WTC 7 to collapse. Wer das glaubt, «brauche psychiatrische Behandlung», so Sheen. Anyone who believes, "needs psychiatric treatment," says Sheen. Eine Sprengung brauche mehrere Tage Vorbereitung. A sprinkling need several days preparation. Osama Bin Laden und seine Helfer seien es wohl nicht gewesen, denn dafür wurden sie nie angeklagt. Osama Bin Laden and his assistants had probably not been there, because that's why they never indicted. Also bleibe nur Mihop. So stay only Mihop. Sheens Aussagen führten zu einem heftigen Streit. Sheens statements led to a fierce dispute. «Wie kann irgendeine vernünftige Person glauben, dass unsere Regierung unser eigenes Volk angegriffen hat?», fragte ein Zuschauer auf CNN per E Mail. "How can any reasonable person believe that our government attacked our own people?", A spectator asked on CNN via e-mail. Ein anderer meinte: «Das ist eine ganz wichtige Sache, die in der breiten Öffentlichkeit diskutiert werden muss. Another said: "This is a very important thing to the general public needs to be discussed. Es ist unsere patriotische Pflicht herauszufinden, warum und wie 9/11 passieren konnte.» It is our patriotic duty to find out why and how 9 / 11 could happen. " Sheen, unterstützt von Hollywoodstar Sharon Stone, blieb bei seiner Frage: «Ich bin einfach nur ein aufrechter amerikanischer Bürger, der seine Steuern bezahlt, sein Land liebt und der sich dagegen wehrt, dass solch grosser Unsinn über so offensichtliche Wahrheiten ausgebreitet wird.» Sheen, supported by Hollywood star Sharon Stone, remained at his question: "I'm just an upright American citizens who pay their taxes, loves his country and the fighting against that such large nonsense about so obvious and hidden truths." Wer im 566 Seiten langen Kean-Report nach WTC 7 und der Ursache für dessen Einsturz sucht, wird enttäuscht. Who in the 566-page report to Kean WTC 7 and the cause of the collapse, you will be disappointed. WTC 7 wird im offiziellen Bericht zu 9/11 mit keinem Wort erwähnt. WTC 7 is the official report on 9 / 11 with no mention. Theologieprofessor David Ray Griffin kritisierte dieses «Weglassen und Verdrehen» scharf und publizierte ein viel beachtetes Buch zu den vielen Unzulänglichkeiten des Kean-Reports in dem er schreibt: «Die 9/11-Kommission umgeht ein anderes peinliches Problem - die Erklärung, wie WTC 7 in praktisch freiem Fall einstürzen konnte -, indem sie den Einsturz des Gebäudes einfach gar nicht erwähnt.» Theology professor David Ray Griffin criticized this "omitting and twisting" sharp and published a highly acclaimed book on the many inadequacies of the Kean report in which he writes: "The 9/11-Kommission avoids another embarrassing problem - the explanation of how WTC 7 in virtually free case could collapse - by the collapse of the building simply not mentioned. " «Wenn die offizielle und abschliessende Untersuchung des 11. "If the official and exhaustive investigation of 11 September nur vom Einsturz von zwei Wolkenkratzern berichtet, während in Tat und Wahrheit drei Wolkenkratzer in Manhattan einstürzten, dann fällt es schwer, den Kean-Report als solide historische Quelle für das Monumentalereignis 9/11 einzustufen», so Geschichtsprofessor Georg Kreis von der Universität Basel. September only by the collapse of two skyscrapers reported, while in reality three skyscrapers in Manhattan einstürzten, then it is difficult, the Kean report as a solid historical source for the monumental event 9 / 11 offences, "says Georg district of History from the University of Basel . «Von diesen Details wissen die wenigsten, aber sie sind Besorgnis erregend.» "From these details to know the least, but they are worrying."
Feuer oder Sprengung? Fire or blown up? Peter Forster, Präsident der eidgenössischen Konsultativkommission für innere Sicherheit, betont, dass es auch für die Schweiz sehr wichtig ist zu wissen, ob der «Krieg gegen den Terrorismus» ein Vorwand ist, um Energieressourcen zu erbeuten. Peter Forster, president of the Federal Consultative for internal security, stresses that it is also for Switzerland is very important to know whether the "war against terrorism" is a pretext to energy resources erbeuten. «Die Debatte um WTC 7 muss man im Auge behalten, unbedingt. "The debate about WTC 7 must keep an eye, necessarily. Aber die Lihop- und Mihop-Theorien sind sehr explosiv, das wäre ungeheuerlich.» But the Lihop and Mihop theories are very explosive, that would be outrageous. " In den USA hat die Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) im Mai 2002 einen Zwischenbericht vorgelegt, in dem sie erklärt, WTC 7 sei ein ganz spezielles Gebäude gewesen. In the U.S., the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) in May 2002 an interim report in which they declared, WTC 7 was a very special building. Das Pentagon, die CIA und der US Secret Service hätten Teile des Hauses gemietet. The Pentagon, the CIA and the U.S. Secret Service had parts of the house rented. Im Keller standen grosse Dieselgeneratoren, um das Haus während Notfällen mit Energie zu versorgen. In the basement were large diesel generators to the house during emergencies with energy. Es sei «zurzeit noch unbekannt», so das Fazit der Fema, «wie das Feuer das Haus zum Einsturz bringen konnte». It was "still unknown", says the conclusions of the Fema, "as the fire the house to collapse could bring". Die «New York Times» kommentierte, das WTC 7 sei das «grosse Geheimnis» der Anschläge, weil bis zu diesem Tag in den USA noch nie ein Gebäude aus Stahl und Beton nur wegen Feuer eingestürzt war. The "New York Times" commented that WTC 7 was the "big secret" of the attacks, because until that date in the U.S. have never been a building made of steel and concrete just because fire collapsed. «Wir wissen einfach nicht, was im WTC 7 genau passiert ist», so Mario Fontana, amtierender Professor am ETH-Institut für Baustatik und Konstruktion (IBK). "We simply do not know what the WTC 7 exactly happened," says Mario Fontana, acting professor at the ETH Institute for building and construction (IBC). An Konferenzen von Baustatik-Experten habe man in den vergangenen fünf Jahren nur sehr wenig zum Einsturz von WTC 7 erfahren. At conferences of building experts have in the past five years very little to the collapse of WTC 7. Es sei zumindest denkbar, dass ein lange anhaltender Brand das Gebäude zum Einsturz gebracht habe. It is at least conceivable that a long sustained fire to the building collapse had been handled. Die Fema gab das WTC-7-Dossier an das National Institute of Standards and Technology (Nist) der Regierung weiter. The Fema, the WTC-7 dossier to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (nesting) of the government. Worauf verunsicherte Amerikaner und Journalisten anriefen und vom Nist wissen wollten, warum das WTC 7 einstürzte. What insecure Americans and journalists called nesting, and wanted to know why the WTC 7 collapsed. «Ich verstehe diese Faszination der Menschen für WTC 7 nicht», erwiderte Nist-Sprecher Michael Newman im März 2006. "I understand this fascination of people for WTC 7 is not", said nesting spokesman Michael Newman in March 2006. «Nach meiner Meinung ist das Gebäude WTC 7 mit grosser Wahrscheinlichkeit fachgerecht gesprengt worden», sagt Hugo Bachmann, emeritierter ETH-Professor für Baustatik und Konstruktion. "In my opinion, the building WTC 7 with very likely been professionally blown," says Hugo Bachmann, ETH emeritus professor of building and construction. Und auch Jörg Schneider, ebenfalls emeritierter ETH-Professor für Baustatik und Konstruktion, deutet die wenigen vorhandenen Videoaufnahmen als Hinweise, dass «das Gebäude WTC 7 mit grosser Wahrscheinlichkeit gesprengt wurde». And Joerg Schneider, also ETH emeritus professor of building and construction, interprets the few existing video recordings as evidence that "the building WTC 7 with great probability was blown up." Der Eigentümer von WTC 1, WTC 2 und WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, erinnerte sich ein Jahr nach den Anschlägen im September 2002 im US-Fernsehen an den Einsturz von WTC 7. The owner of the WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, remembered one year after the attacks in September 2002 with U.S. television to the collapse of WTC 7th Die Feuerwehr habe ihn informiert, dass es im Haus brenne. The fire department had informed him that it is in the house burn. Darauf sagte Silverstein gemäss seinen eigenen Angaben: «Vielleicht ist es am besten, wenn wir es sprengen» («to pull it»). That said Silverstein according to its own figures: "Maybe it's best if we blow up" (to pull it "). «Und so haben sie entschieden, es zu sprengen, und wir schauten zu, wie das Gebäude runterkam.» Später verteidigte sich Silverstein, er habe mit «pull it» die «Feuerwehrmänner evakuieren» gemeint. "And they have decided to blow it, and we looked at how the building runterkam." Later Silverstein defended himself that he had with "pull it" the "firemen evacuate" meant. Worauf 9/11-Kritiker wie US-Millionär Jimmy Walter betonten, das sei Unsinn, «it» müsse sich auf eine Sache beziehen. What 9/11-Kritiker as U.S. millionaire Jimmy Walter stressed that this is nonsense, "it" needs to adapt to one thing. Stahlträger in Asien Steel makers in Asia Ob Feuer oder Sprengung zum Einsturz von WTC 7 führte, müsste man an den Stahlträgern untersuchen. Whether fire or explosives to collapse of WTC 7 led, it should be possible to the steel makers. Aber die sind weg. But they are gone. «Über 80% des Stahls des WTC ist schon verkauft worden, das meiste, wenn nicht sogar alles, bevor die Wissenschafter und Kriminologen es untersuchen konnten», protestierte Anthony Weiner, Parlamentarier aus New York, im März 2002 im US-Parlament. "About 80% of the steel of the WTC is already been sold, most, if not all, before the scientists and criminologists could investigate it," protested Anthony Weiner, members of parliament from New York, in March 2002 in the U.S. House. Der Stahl wurde in Asien recycelt. The steel was recycled in Asia. Professor Frederick Mowrer vom Fire Protection Engineering Department der University of Maryland, der zusammen mit anderen US-Experten den Zusammensturz der WTC-Gebäude untersuchen musste, kritisierte dieses Vorgehen scharf: «Ich finde die Geschwindigkeit, mit der wichtige Beweise weggeschafft und recycelt wurden, erschreckend.» Professor Frederick Mowrer, Fire Protection Engineering Department at the University of Maryland, together with other U.S. experts, the collapse of the WTC buildings had to investigate, sharply criticized this approach: "I think the speed with which important evidence and recycled weggeschafft were alarmingly . " * Daniele Ganser ist Historiker an der Universität Zürich. * Daniele Ganser is a historian at the University of Zurich. Sein Buch «NATO’s Secret Armies» untersucht inszenierten Terrorismus im Kalten Krieg. His book "NATO's Secret Armies" examines terrorism staged in the Cold War. Zum neuen Sammelband von David Ray Griffin («911 and American Empire: Academics Speak Out») hat er ein Kapitel beigetragen. The new anthology by David Ray Griffin ( "911 and American Empire: Academics Speak Out"), he has contributed a chapter. http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%7Cen&u=http://www.danieleganser.ch/&prev=/language_toolshttp://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=de%7Cen&u=http://www.danieleganser.ch/&prev=/language_tools_
_________________
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2008/04/14-structural-engineers-have-now.html Wednesday, April 09, 2008 Numerous Structural Engineers Now Publicly Challenge Government's Explanation for Destruction of the World Trade Center Numerous structural engineers now publicly challenge the government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11, including: Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says: "Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition"
Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes: "Why would all 110 stories drop straight down to the ground in about 10 seconds, pulverizing the contents into dust and ash - twice. Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds the same day? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust." Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out: "WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?"
Paul W. Mason, structural engineer, of Melbourne, Australia, argues: "In my view, the chances of the three buildings collapsing symmetrically into their own footprint, at freefall speed, by any other means than by controlled demolition, are so remote that there is no other plausible explanation!" David Scott, Structural Engineer, of Scotland, argues: "Near-freefall collapse violates laws of physics. Fire induced collapse is not consistent with observed collapse mode . . . ." Nathan Lomba, Structural Engineer, of Eureka, California, states
"I began having doubts about, so called, official explanations for the collapse of the WTC towers soon after the explanations surfaced. The gnawing question that lingers in my mind is: How did the structures collapse in near symmetrical fashion when the apparent precipitating causes were asymmetrical loading? The collapses defies common logic from an elementary structural engineering perspective. “If” you accept the argument that fire protection covering was damaged to such an extent that structural members in the vicinity of the aircraft impacts were exposed to abnormally high temperatures, and “if” you accept the argument that the temperatures were high enough to weaken the structural framing, that still does not explain the relatively concentric nature of the failures.Neither of the official precipitating sources for the collapses, namely the burning aircraft, were centered within the floor plan of either tower; both aircraft were off-center when they finally came to rest within the respective buildings. This means that, given the foregoing assumptions, heating and weakening of the structural framing would have been constrained to the immediate vicinity of the burning aircraft. Heat transmission (diffusion) through the steel members would have been irregular owing to differing sizes of the individual members; and, the temperature in the members would have dropped off precipitously the further away the steel was from the flames—just as the handle on a frying pan doesn't get hot at the same rate as the pan on the burner of the stove. These factors would have resulted in the structural framing furthest from the flames remaining intact and possessing its full structural integrity, i.e., strength and stiffness.Structural steel is highly ductile, when subjected to compression and bending it buckles and bends long before reaching its tensile or shear capacity. Under the given assumptions, “if” the structure in the vicinity of either burning aircraft started to weaken, the superstructure above would begin to lean in the direction of the burning side. The opposite, intact, side of the building would resist toppling until the ultimate capacity of the structure was reached, at which point, a weak-link failure would undoubtedly occur. Nevertheless, the ultimate failure mode would have been a toppling of the upper floors to one side—much like the topping of a tall redwood tree—not a concentric, vertical collapse.For this reason alone, I rejected the official explanation for the collapse of the WTC towers out of hand. Subsequent evidence supporting controlled, explosive demolition of the two buildings are more in keeping with the observed collapse modalities and only serve to validate my initial misgivings as to the causes for the structural failures."
Edward E. Knesl, civil and structural engineer, of Phoenix, Arizona, writes: "We design and analyze buildings for the overturning stability to resist the lateral loads with the combination of the gravity loads. Any tall structure failure mode would be a fall over to its side. It is impossible that heavy steel columns could collapse at the fraction of the second within each story and subsequently at each floor below.We do not know the phenomenon of the high rise building to disintegrate internally faster than the free fall of the debris coming down from the top.The engineering science and the law of physics simply doesn't know such possibility. Only very sophisticated controlled demolition can achieve such result, eliminating the natural dampening effect of the structural framing huge mass that should normally stop the partial collapse. The pancake theory is a fallacy, telling us that more and more energy would be generated to accelerate the collapse. Where would such energy would be coming from ?"
_________________
Why did the citizens' 9-11 petition ended up in FILE 13?
++
From: "Spitzer's Real Scandal"http://www.nymegaphone.com/node/24... New York real estate baron Larry Silverstein became primary lease-holder on the World Trade Center a mere six weeks before 9/11. It had never changed hands before. For a down payment, Silverstein put up only $14 million of his own money, and his friends at the powerful investment bank Blackstone Group kicked in another $111 million. After 9/11, Silverstein demanded a whopping $7 billion insurance payout, in the form of two $3.5 billion payments. He argued the two different plane crashes were two separate "occurrences" of two separate attacks.The Megaphone has now learned that as attorney general, Spitzer got involved behind the scenes, and in the courts, filing a amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief on Silverstein’s behalf on Jan. 15, 2003. For years, this brief languished in the files of the public records room on the 17th floor of the Second Circuit Court in Manhattan, until it was discovered and brought to The New York Megaphone by NYC attorney and author Carl Person. The court ended up agreeing with Spitzer and Silverstein, over-turning the decision of a lower court. Spitzer helped mid-wife a fat compromise and an eventual $4.5 billion payout for Silverstein. The Megaphone’s multiple requests for comment from Governor Spitzer were ignored.Attorney Carl Person told The Megaphone, "I was surprised to see that Spitzer had used his position as attorney general to support one private litigant over another. Normally, this is not done…Silverstein could well have been someone who destroyed evidence concerning the 9/11 events by apparently ordering or consenting to the tearing (pulling) down of 7 WTC and the removal of the debris from his multiple ground leased premises thereafter."Silverstein’s World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11 without being hit by an airplane. Thirty seven eyewitnesses working on the ground as firefighters, EMTs, and reporters, recalled being warned in advance the tower was coming down. The official story however, claims a fire ignited a fuel tank in the building, hastening its sudden collapse.WTC 7 was the NY headquarters of CIA and the SEC office investigating Enron. 9/11 skeptics believe the building was taken down by controlled demolition. Larry Silverstein himself said in a 2002 episode of PBS’s Frontline that on 9/11 he recalled remarking, "Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it…they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." Silverstein later claimed that by "pull," he meant removing firefighters, not pulling the building down. However, all firefighters had been "pulled" from the building three hours earlier.The Kroll ConnectionThis past August, another scandal radiated from the Spitzer circle. This time it was Nixon’s arch-strategist Roger Stone leaving a threatening voice mail for Spitzer’s dad, Bernard. Stone allegedly claimed he would subpoena the elder Spitzer for the $5 million in illegal loans Spitzer senior made to his son during his 1998 Attorney General campaign. Stone denied he had made the call. To prove he did, the Spitzer family hired Kroll Associates to trace the call. Why Kroll? Spitzer has a long relationship with this powerful, cryptic security company.Kroll’s CEO on 9/11 was one of Spitzer’s old mentors from the Manhattan DA’s office, Michael Cherkasky. Cherkasky investigated bank BCCI (which had links to both Islamic terror and the CIA), and the mysterious 1993 World Trade Center (WTC) bombing. Cherkasky’s 2002 book Forewarned: Why the Government is Failing to Protect Us, and What We Must Do to Protect Ourselves is a confused mix of fear-mongering and insider’s analysis. He sheepishly admits that the CIA was in part culpable for the 1993 WTC bombing, since they helped pull known terrorist "Blind Sheikh" Abdel bin-Rahman into the country. Cherkasky admits the FBI had a mole inside Rahman’s 1993 WTC bombing cell, and lays blame for the bombing on the FBI.After observing the 1993 WTC bombing as an operation penetrated by CIA and FBI, Cherkasky he became head of Kroll, the "the CIA of Wall Street." Kroll took on the management of WTC after the 1993 bombing. Blackstone Group, the same financiers who backed the Larry Silverstein, have also been involved with Kroll, owning big chunks of Kroll stock on occasion, according to SEC reports.Cherkasky has donated $14,500 to Eliot Spitzer's political campaigns.
___________________
THE WITNESSES "On the morning of September 11th, I was in my office. I was just getting the work handed out to all the employees. ... [Editor's note: At this point, Mr. [Anthony] Saltalamacchia was in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's impact point at floors 93 to 98.] We heard a massive explosion that was in the World Trade Center about 8:46 a.m. in the morning. The explosion came from -- I believe at first we believed that it came from the Mechanical Room. [Editor's note: The Mechanical Room was below them in a lower sub-basement .]Then we heard a series of other explosions that sounded up on the above levels of the building. We then realized that there was something wrong and there was a major problem. And about, I'd say, 14 to 15 people came running and screaming into our office. ... Then right after that the floor started shaking. The tile from above, which was above us, started coming down, falling on us. And we knew that there was something seriously wrong happening. A man came into the office. He was a black man, very shaky, like in shock. He had multiple wounds. His arms were bleeding. Skin was peeling off. You could see basically his flesh. It was a very tough thing to see. ... [Editor's note: Mr. Saltalamacchia is referring to Felipe David.] And as we're standing there, more explosions were happening. A lot of screaming confusion. ... It was very smoky, very cloudy. It just looked very serious. We knew we had to get out of the building. ... The amount of explosions I've heard from 8:46 until the time we got out was so many, at least ten. It was just like multiple explosions to where I felt like there were different grenades. That's what it sounded like, it was different grenades being set off in the building. It was like -- There was one major explosion, and then there was different explosions throughout that period of time until we got out. Do I believe six years after 9/11? I don't know the truth. I don't believe a word that they say. I just don't believe Everything they say is a cover up. ... No, definitely don't leave it alone. I think that we should get documents to know the truth of what was really going on that we didn't know that we should know now." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzpaZE5XSfg&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ewilliam911%2Ecom%2F _______________________ "At 8:30 he says he was headed for level B-4 in Tower One [North Tower], four stories below ground. "... As I'm walking by the main freight car of the building, in the corridor, that's when I got blown. I mean the impact of the explosion, from whatever happened, it threw me to the floor. And that's when everything started happening. It knocked me right to the floor. You didn't know what it was. Of course, you're assuming something fell over on the loading dock, something very heavy, something very big. You don't know what happened. And all of a sudden you just felt the floor moving. ... [Editor's note: At this point, Mr. Morelli was in the sub-basement of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's point of impact at floors 93 to 98.]I was racing -- I was going towards the bathroom. All of a sudden. I opened the door. I didn't know it was a bathroom And all of a sudden a big impact happened again. And all the ceiling tiles were falling down. The light fixtures were falling, swinging out of the ceiling. And I come running out the door and everything, the walls were down. And I now started running towards the parking lots." Nearly 100 floors below where the first plane hit Phil felt the devastating impact. ... "As I ran to the parking lots, you know, I mean, everybody screaming ... There was a lot of smoke down there. ... You gotta go clear across the whole -- from One to Two World Trade Center. That's the way you gotta run. And then all of a sudden it happened all over again. Building Two got hit. I don't know that. I just know something else hit us to the floor. Right in the basement you felt it. The walls were caving in. Everything that was going on. I know of people that got killed in the basement. I know of people that got broken legs in the basement. People got reconstructive surgery because the walls hit them in the face." http://real.ny1.com:8080/ramgen/real/RMmorelli00028467_020908_194213hi.rm __________________
ABC 9/12/01: Peter Jennings interviewed Marlene Cruz the day after 9/11. Ms. Cruz, a WTC carpenter, was injured in the basement of WTC North Tower on 9/11. She was the first casualty from the WTC to arrive at Bellevue Hospital. Peter Jennings: So tell me how you're feeling. How did you get there? What happened to you? Marlene Cruz: I work for the Trade Center. I'm one of the carpenters. And I was gonna go do a job. And I got on the elevator, the freight elevator. And I heard the first explosion. And the elevator blew up. The doors blew up. And it dropped. I was lucky that the elevator got caught between two floors. Peter Jennings: Which floors? Marlene Cruz: The B Levels. The basement levels. ... [Editor's note: At this point, Ms. Cruz was in the basement of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's point of impact at floors 93 to 98.] After the first explosion I was laying on the floor about 40 minutes. Peter Jennings: And how well do you know that subterranean part of the World Trade Center? Marlene Cruz: Well, I worked for the building for 15 years. I think I know it from the back of my hand. Really I didn't expect this bombing to occur after the first one, since I was in the first one, also. But when I heard that explosion that's the first thing I thought was; here we go again, another bomb. http://youtube.com/watch?v=TSGZYP--wz0 _______________________ Mike Pecoraro and a co-worker were working in the sub-basement of the North Tower when the first airplane hit. "They had been told to stay where they were and "sit tight" until the Assistant Chief got back to them. By this time, however, the room they were working in began to fill with a white smoke. "We smelled kerosene," Mike recalled, "I was thinking maybe a car fire was upstairs", referring to the parking garage located below grade in the tower but above the deep space where they were working. [Editor's note: At this point, Mr. Pecoraro was in the sub-basement of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's impact point at floors 93 to 98.] The two decided to ascend the stairs to the C level, to a small machine shop where Vito Deleo and David Williams were supposed to be working. When the two arrived at the C level, they found the machine shop gone. "There was nothing there but rubble, " Mike said. "We're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press? gone!" The two began yelling for their co-workers, but there was no answer. They saw a perfect line of smoke streaming through the air. "You could stand here," he said, "and two inches over you couldn't breathe. We couldn't see through the smoke so we started screaming." But there was still no answer. The two made their way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone. "There were no walls, there was rubble on the floor, and you can't see anything" he said. [Editor's note: At this point, Mr. Pecoraro was in the basement of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane's point of impact at floors 93 to 98.] They decided to ascend two more levels to the building's lobby. As they ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up "like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on the floor. "They got us again," Mike told his co-worker, referring to the terrorist attack at the center in 1993. Having been through that bombing, Mike recalled seeing similar things happen to the building's structure. He was convinced a bomb had gone off in the building. Mike walked through the open doorway and found two people lying on the floor. One was a female Carpenter and the other an Elevator Operator. They were both badly burned and injured." http://www.chiefengineer.org/article.cfm?seqnum1=1029 _______________________
9:52 a.m. Chief Palmer: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones."Ladder 15: "What stair are you in, Orio?" Battalion Seven Aide: "Seven Alpha to lobby command post." Ladder Fifteen: "Fifteen to Battalion Seven." Chief Palmer: "... Ladder 15." Ladder 15: "Chief, what stair you in?" Chief Palmer: "South stairway Adam, South Tower." Ladder 15: "Floor 78?" Chief Palmer: "Ten-four, numerous civilians, we gonna need two engines up here." Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're on our way." 9:52 a.m. Battalion Seven Aide: "Seven Alpha for Battalion Seven." Chief Palmer: "South tower, Steve, south tower, tell them ...Tower one." Chief Palmer: "Fifteen." Chief Palmer: "I'm going to need two of your firefighters, Adam stairway, to knock down two fires. We have a house line stretched we could use some water on it, knock it down, kay." Ladder 15: "Alright ten-four, we're coming up the stairs. We're on 77 now in the B stair, I'll be right to you." Ladder 15 Roof: "Fifteen Roof to 15. We're on 71. We're coming right up." 9:57 a.m. "Division 3 ... lobby command, to the Fieldcom command post." Chief Palmer: "Operations Tower One to floor above Battalion Nine." Battalion Nine Chief: "Battalion Nine to command post." Battalion Seven Operations Tower One: "Battalion Seven Operations Tower One to Battalion Nine, need you on floor above 79. We have access stairs going up to 79, kay." Battalion Nine: "Alright, I'm on my way up, Orio." Two minutes later, at 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/firefighters.htm _______________________
by Enver Masud Rebuttal of The 9/11 Commission Report.] A simple formula, familiar to high school students, can be used to refute the official account of American Airlines Flight 77 -- alleged to have struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Force = Mass X Velocity Squared / Radius This formula approximates the force that would be exerted on an aircraft when it transitions from its downward path to level flight. First we determine the mass of the aircraft. Flight 77, a Boeing 757, had taken off from Washington Dulles International airport, and was bound for Los Angeles. Assuming its fuel tanks were full, and ignoring the weight of the 64 passengers, and cargo (which should be available if one wants to include them), the weight of the plane would be about 255,000 pounds (Boeing Technical Specifications). For our calculation we'll assume that weight and mass are equal, i.e. 255,000 pounds. For velocity we turn to the official account that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at "530 miles per hour" (The 9/11 Commission Report, p10). For our calculation we'll assume that speed and velocity are equal, i.e. 530 mph. To calculate the radius, we could begin with a statement in The 9/11 Commission Report (p9): Flight 77 was "5 miles west-southwest of the Pentagon" when it "began a 330-degree turn. At the end of turn, it was descending through 2,200 feet". Next we need to calculate the maximum radius (the most conservative case) of the arc that would allow the aircraft to transition from its downward path to level flight (while clearing obstacles in its path), and strike the Pentagon at the point described in official reports. We chose instead to use the radius calculated by Pilots for 9/11 Truth. Pilots for 9/11 Truth base their calculation on the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) data obtained pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request filed with the National Transportation Safety Board, and carefully constructed topography of the area below the flight path. Leaving aside the discrepancies between the official account of Flight 77, and the Flight Data Recorder (which NTSB refuses to answer), Pilots for 9/11 Truth calculated a radius equal to about 579 feet. From this they calculated the force on the Boeing 757 at 34 Gs, i.e. 34 times the force due to gravity. There has been some criticism of the calculations performed by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, and they have answered their critics. With mass, velocity, and radius equal to 255,000 lbs, 530 mph, and 579 feet respectively, the preceding formula yields force equal to 8,276,850 lbs, i.e. the Boeing 757 would act as if it had increased its weight by 8,276,850 lbs, or more than 32 times its normal weight. With a virtual weight of about 8.5 million pounds, Flight 77 could not have levelled off before striking the Pentagon. It would have crashed before it reached the Pentagon. This single fact is sufficient to refute the official account of "Flight 77." Neither Hani Hanjour -- the alleged pilot trainee "noted for incompetence", nor the Boeing 757, would have been in any condition to fly with "the top of the fuselage of the aircraft no more than 20 ft above the ground" (Pentagon Building Performance Report, p14). Pilots for 9/11 Truth did another calculation by lowering the height of "Flight 77" below that shown by the FDR. They lowered it to to the top of the Virginia Department of Transportation communications antenna that sits below the alleged flight path. With this very conservative case, they calculated the force on the Boeing 757 at 11.2 Gs. "11.2 Gs was never recorded in the FDR. 11.2 Gs would rip the aircraft apart" they state. If you disagree, figure out the mass, velocity, and radius, and plug them into the formula to calculate the force. If you have a better formula, use it. Could a Boeing 757 survive the calculated force? What hard evidence has the government released to support its position? If you have that evidence, we'd like to see it. Scientific, and other evidence, reinforce the conclusion: Flight 77 did not strike the Pentagon. --- "Evidence can prove a theory wrong, by establishing facts that are inconsistent with the theory. In contrast, evidence cannot prove a theory correct because other evidence, yet to be discovered, may exist that is inconsistent with the theory." "In the scientific search for truth there are no time limits and no point at which a final decision must be made." (Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, p81) Enver Masud, "What Really Happened on September 11 at the Pentagon," The Wisdom Fund, March 7, 2005
9-11, The Woolworth Incident
Advertisement
PNAC document
"A notorious cabal of war thugs carved out the plan for 9-11 about 12 months prior to d-day. Please note that the PNAC as well as many other entities set up for 9-11 were shut down after the caper." Whilimena
______________________ http://www.ecapc.org/pnac.asp?print=Yes& Many thanks to Sam Wenger for preparing this summary. PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY (PNAC) Compiled by Sam Wenger These are talking points concerning this PNAC plan which George W. Bush has apparently adopted as a blueprint for his administration’s foreign policy. An original copy of this PNAC document can be obtained from: www.newamericancentury.org It consists of 90 pages. What does this (PNAC) document reveal about the following topics and ideas? 1. Weapons of Mass Destruction. As for Iraq’s alleged "weapons of mass destruction", these were dismissed, in so many words, as a convenient excuse, which it is. "While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification," it says, "the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." How has this grand strategy been implemented? A series of articles in the Washington Post, co-authored by Bob Woodward of Watergate fame and based on long interviews with senior members of the Bush administration, reveals how September 11 was manipulated. 2. Terrorism. One should note that on September 12, 2001, without any evidence of who the hijackers were, Donald Rumsfeld demanded that the United States attack Iraq. According to Woodward, Rumsfeld told a cabinet meeting that Iraq should be "a principal target of the first round in the war against terrorism". Iraq was temporarily spared only because Colin Powell, the secretary of state, persuaded Bush that "public opinion has to be prepared before a move against Iraq is possible". Afghanistan was chosen as the softer option. If Jonathan Steele’s estimate in the Guardian is correct, some 20,000 people in Afghanistan paid the price of this debate with their lives. 3. Saddam Hassein. One of the PNAC group documents clearly shows that Bush and his most senior cabinet members had already planned an attack on Iraq before he took power in January 2001. In their plan entitled "Rebuilding American’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century," reveals that the current members of Bush’s cabinet had already planned, before the 2000 presidential election, to take military control of the Gulf region whether Saddam Hussein is in power or not. "Even should Saddam pass from the scene," the plan says U.S. military bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain, despite domestic opposition in the Gulf states to the permanent stationing of U.S. troops. Iran, it says, "may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests as Iraq has." The 90-page PNAC document from September 2000 says: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein. The plan calls for Permanent Military Bases in Iraq to dominate the Middle East including neighboring Iran. 4. Global Dominance - a major aspect of Bush’s foreign policy has been spelled out in the PNAC blueprint? How does this document view our efforts for global dominance? a) United States must seize the opportunity for global domination as a result of the world giving us this unique opportunity with the fall of the Soviet Union empire. We are now the sole world superpower. We need to seize this opportunity for the well- being of future generations. b) Containment and deterrence course of action would not allow for the expansion of American power. In other words, a peaceful settlement is not in our best interest in Iraq. We must conquer Iraq (in the spirit of the Romans). There is no exit strategy for Iraq because the President has none! The Bush Administration plan to keep permanent military bases in Iraq from which to control the whole Middle East including a possible invasion of Iran and maybe Saudi Arabia in the future. Remember Iran was identified by George W. Bush as one of the three members of the "Axis of Evil". As we speak, Iran is being identified in the news as a nation developing nuclear weapons. If the Bush administration has their way we will soon be attacking Iran! c) United States must conquer and occupy land areas even though we may be viewed as "American Internationalist". This may involve ignoring international opinion if that suits our U.S. interests. UN approval is helpful and desirable but becomes irrelevant if decisions of certain UN resolutions goes against our country’s wishes. d) Must maintain military presence all over the world. Permanent U.S. military and economic domination of every region on the globe, unfettered by international treaty or concern. No ABM treaty, no Koyoto treaty, etc. to control our foreign policy. Pre-emptied attacks against perceived enemies may be needed. "The best defense is a good offense." e) In due time the United States will emerge as a full-fledged global empire. That appears to be the plan! 5. Members of the present Bush Administration had important roles in the formulation of the PNAC document. The following individuals were a part of a group of conservative interventionists who have been outraged by the thought that the United States might be forfeiting its chance for global domination.(or empire as others outside their ranks say). - Paul Wolfowitz is now Deputy Defense Secretary. - John Bolton is Undersecretary of State. - Stephen Cambone is head of the Pentagon’s Office of Program, Analysis and Evaluation. - Eliot Cohen is a member of the Defense Policy Board, which advises Rumsfeld. - Devon Cross is a member of the Defense Policy Board, which advises Rumsfeld. - I. Lewis Libby is Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney. - Dov Zakheim is Comptroller for the Defense Department. - Other founders of PNAC include Vice-President Dick Cheney , Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, William J. Bennett (Reagan’s former Education Secretary), and Zalmay Khalilzad (Bush’s Ambassador to Afghanistan). 6. Worldwide "Pax Americana". The U.S. needs to project sufficient power worldwide to enforce Pax Americana. The strategic "transformation" of the U.S. military into an imperialistic force of global domination would require a hugh increase in defense spending to "a minimum need to raise defense spending from 3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to 3.8 percent with the addition of $15 to 20$ billion annually. It should be noted that George W. Bush had requested $379 billion in his most recent budget proposal which is exactly the 3.8 percent called for in the PNAC plan. 7. A "New Pearl Harbor". PNAC says that what was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor". The attacks of September 11, 2001 provided the "new Pearl Harbor", described as "the opportunity of ages". The extremists who have since exploited September 11 come from the era of Ronald Reagan, when far-right groups and "think-tanks" were established to avenge the American "defeat" in Vietnam. In the 1990s, there was an added agenda: to justify the denial of a "peace dividend" following the cold war. The Project for the New American Century was formed, along with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and others that have since merge the ambitions of the Reagan administration with those of the current Bush regime. Time and again, September 11 is described as an "opportunity". It provided the necessary catalyst to put the global war plan into effect. Congress quickly allocated $40 billion to fund the "war on terrorism" shortly after September 11. In the last April’s New Yorker, the investigative reporter Nicholas Lemann wrote that Bush’s most senior adviser, Condoleezze Rice, told him she had called together senior members of the National Security County and asked them "to think about ‘how do you capitalize on these opportunities, which she compared with those of "1945 to 1947"; the start of the cold war. Since September 11, America has established bases at the gateways to all the major sources of fossil fuels, especially central Asia. The Unocal oil company is to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Bush as scrapped the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, the war crimes provisions of the International Criminal Court and the anti-ballistic missile treaty. He has said he will use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states "if necessary". Under cover of propaganda about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, the Bush regime is developing new weapons of mass destruction that undermine international treaties on biological and chemical warfare. 8. Envisions a stark expansion of our global military presence. Will require bases and stations within and beyond Western Europe and northeast Asia - as well as temporary access arrangements for the long-distance deployment of U.S. troops. 9. "At no time in history has the international security order been as conducive to American interests and ideals", the report said. "This challenge of this coming century is to preserve and enhance this ‘American peace’ " 10. This 2000 report reads like a "blueprint" for the current Bush defense policy. Most of what PNAC advocates, the Bush Administration has tried to accomplish. For example, the PNAC report urged the following: - the repudiation of the anti-ballistic missile (ABM) treaty. - commitment to a global missile defense (GMD) system. The Bush Administration has followed this course on both counts. 11. PNAC advocated the "transformation" of the U.S. military to meet its expanded obligations, including the cancellation of such outmoded defense programs as the Crusader artillery system. That’s exactly the message being preached by Donald Rumsfeld and others. 12. PNAC urges the development of small nuclear warheads "required in targeting the very deep, underground hardened bunkers that are being built by many of our potential adversaries. This year the GOP-led U.S. House gave the Pentagon the green light to develop such a weapon, called the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator, while the Senate has so far balked at the decision. PNAC states that the United States should develop "bunker-buster" nuclear weapons and make "star wars" a national priority. This is now happening. The PNAC report said that, in the event of Bush taking power, Iraq should be a target. Guess what? Iraq is now our target! 13. Constabulary Duties: PNAC clearly identifies Iran, Iraq and North Korea as primary short-term targets, well before President Bush tagged them as the "Axis of Evil". In this report, the writers criticize the fact that in war planning against North Korea and Iraq, "past Pentagon war games have give little or no consideration to the force requirements necessary not only to defeat an attack but to remove these regimes from power." To preserve the Pax Americana, the report says U.S. forces will be required to perform "constabulary duties" - The United States acting as policeman of the world -- and says that such actions "demand American political leadership rather than that of the United Nations." 14. PNAC report advocates a much larger military presence spread over more of the globe, in addition to the roughly 130 nations in which U.S. troops are already deployed. More specifically, they argue that we need permanent military bases in the Middle East, in Southeast Europe, in Latin America and in Southeast Asia, where no such bases now exist. This explains why the Bush administration rushed to install U.S. troops in Georgia and the Philippines, as well as our eagerness to send military advisers to assist in the civil war in Colombia. 15. PNAC acknowledges its debt to an earlier document, drafted in 1992 by the Defense Department under the direction of Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz who were the Secretary of Defense and Defense Undersecretary for Policy, respectively. PNAC was founded in the spring of 1997 by the well-known Zionist neo-conservatives Robert Kagan and William Kristol, writer for the Weekly Standard. The PNAC is part of the New Citizenship Project, whose chairman is also William Kristol, and is described as "a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership. Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, and Paul Wolfowitz signed a Statement of Principles of the PNAC on June 3, 1997, along with many of the other current members of Bush’s "war cabinet." Paul Wolfowitz was one of the directors of PNAC until he joined the Bush Administration in 2001. 16) A "core mission" for the transformed U.S. military is to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars," according to the PNAC. 17. Implications of a Pax Americana are immense. What will be it’s effect on our Allies? a) Once we assert the unilateral right to act as the world’s policeman, our allies will quickly recede into the background. We will be forces to spend American wealth and American blood protecting the peace while other nations redirect their wealth to such things as health care for the citizenry. Donald Kagan, co-chairman of the 2000 New Century project, acknowledges that likelihood. He says, "If our allies want a free ride, and they probably will, we can’t stop that," he says. But he also argues that the United States, given it unique position, has no choice but to act anyway. b) Candidate George W. Bush certainly did not campaign on such a change. It is not something that he or others have dared to discuss honestly with the American people. To the contrary, in his foreign policy debate with Al Gore, Bush pointedly advocated a more humble foreign policy, a position calculated to appeal to voters leery of military intervention. c) For the same reason, Kagan and others shy away from terms such as empire, understanding its connotations. But they also argue that it would be naive and dangerous to reject the role that history has thrust upon us. Kagan, for example, willingly embraces the idea that the United States would establish permanent military bases in a post-war Iraq. "I think that’s highly possible, " he says. "We will probably need a major concentration of forces in the Middle East over a long period of time. That will come at a price, but think of the price of not having it. When we have economic problems, it’s been caused by disruptions in our oil supply. If we have a force in Iraq, there will be no disruption in oil supplies." 18. War with Iraq as an object lesson for other nations. Rumsfeld and Kagan believe that a successful war against Iraq will produce other benefits, such as serving an object lesson for nations such as Iran and Syria. Rumsfeld, as befits his sensitive position, puts it rather gently. If a regime change were to take place in Iraq, other nations pursuing weapons of mass destruction "would get the message that having them...is attracting attention that is not favorable and is not helpful, " he says. Co-chairman Kagan says that "People worry a lot about how the Arab street is going to react, " he notes. "Well, I see that the Arab street has gotten very, very quit since we started blowing things up." 19. Cost of such a global commitment would be enormous. In 2000, we spent $281 billion on our military, which was more than the next 11 nations combined. By 2003, our expenditures will have risen to $378 billion. In other words, the increase in our defense budget from 1999-2003 will be more than the total amount spent annually by China, our next largest competitor. This budget would allow the U.S. to fight and win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars". This has happened. Billions of dollars in additional defense spending are but the first step in the group’s long-term plan to transform the U.S. military into a global army enforcing a terroristic and bloody Pax Americana around the world. 20. The lure of empire is ancient and powerful, and over the millennia it has driven men to commit terrible crimes on its behalf. But with the end of the Cold War and the disappearance of the Soviet Union, a global empire was essentially laid at the feet of the United States. To the chagrin of some, we did not seize it at the time, in large part because the American people have never been comfortable with themselves as a "New Rome". 21. In the debate whether to invade Iraq, we are really debating the role that the United States will play in the years and decades to come. In August of 2002, Defense Policy Board chairman and PNAC member Richard Perle heard a policy briefing from a think tank associated with the Rand Corporation. According to the Washington Post and The Nation, the final slide of this presentation described "Iraq as the tactical pivot, Saudi Arabia as the strategic pivot, and Egypt as the prize" in a war that would purportedly be about ridding the world of Saddam Hussein’s weapons. Bush has deployed massive forces into the Mideast region, while simultaneously engaging American forces in the Philippines and playing nuclear chicken with North Korea. Somewhere in all this lurks at least one of the "major theater wars" desired by the September 2000 PNAC report. 22. Are peace and security best achieved by seeking strong alliances and international consensus, led by the United States, or is it necessary to take a more unilateral approach, accepting and enhancing the global dominance that, according to some, history has thrust upon us? If we do decide to seize empire, we should make that decision knowingly, as a democracy. The price of maintaining an empire is always high. 23) Richard Perle. He is one of George W. Bush’s "thinkers". He was interviewed by John Pilger when he was advising Reagan and when he spoke about "total war", he sounded like a madman. Perle recently used these terms again in describing America’s "war on terror". "No stages.", he said. "This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will embrace it entirely and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs about us years from now." This Perle is one of the founders of the "Project for the New American Century." 24) PNAC funding sources for this "neo-con" Washington-based "think-tank" organization. It is funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil and weapons and defense industries, drafted the war plan for U.S. global domination through military power. 25) Three Principles of PNAC. 1) The group’s essential demand was for hefty increases in defense spending. "We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future, ". This increase in defense spending is to bring about two of the other principles: 2) "to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values." 3) "to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles." 26) "This is a blueprint for United States world domination - a new world order of their making, "Tam Dalyell, British parliamentarian and critic of the war policy from the Labor Party said. "These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. This is garbage from think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks," Dalyell said, "men who have never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. William Rivers Pitt wrote on February 25, 2003, "Above all else, PNAC desires and demands one thing: The establishment of a global American empire to bend the will of all nations. They chafe at the idea that the United States, the last remaining superpower, does not do more by way of economic and military force to bring the rest of the world under the umbrella of a new socio-economic Pax Americana." 27) Joy-Ann Lomena-Reid in a March 12, 2003 article for Common Dreams states, "The Bush administration has so damaged its own argument and credibility with the rest of the world regarding its motives for war (the Project for the New American Century may not get ink on American TV but it’s big news overseas), that we need a proxy force to be the one taking Kirkuk. If our soldiers are seen putting out the fires set by Hussein to deny us what he and much of the world sees as our prime objective -- control of Iraq’s vast oil wealth -- then we win the war and lose the aftermath. Saddam Hussein has all but laid it out for the world -- America is attacking Iraq to steal her oil, and Iraq would rather but it themselves then give it to Bush and his cabal. Better, then to let the British steal it for us."
