Saturday, November 27, 2004

Opening arguments, 9-11

On the Trail of the terrorists: by WHILIMENA


"When a whole nation is roaring patriotism at the top of its voice. I am fain to explore the cleanness of its hands and the purity of its heart." Ralph Waldo Emerson

The United States District Court

Washington, DC

United States Citizens vs. al Qaeda


18 U.S.C. 1921 (RICO)

18 U.S.C. 371 (Conspiracy to commit criminal offense)

18 U.S.C. 1341 (Mail fraud)

18 U.S.C. 1503 (Obstruction of Justice)

18 U.S.C 1621 (perjury)

Opening statement before this Honorable Court:

Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen of this Court, as Chief Prosecutor, I submit that the September 11, 2001 attacks upon these United States, were a part of a profiteering and Survival Scam. I further submit that the culprits included members of the local al Qaeda network.

Your Honor, I label these culprits 'Conspiracy of Dunces', (COD), because although some aspects of the crime entailed sophistication and technique, most of the operation was manned by fools; because although numerous warnings were given they decided to execute the crime anyway; and, they made numerous implicating mistakes while executing the said crime; including the most stupid act - demolishing WTC 7. Frankly, had they allow WTC 7 to remain intact, they probably would have been able to get away with the crime. Most importantly, some of these culprits have verbally and otherwise implicated themselves.

The evidence will show that the Conspirati, a group of poweful dunces with the world's most formidable military apparatus, the world's most advanced air defense system, all failed in approximately two hours to identify and intercept rogue craft attacking the United States.

These hoods try to tell the American people that one evil genius bogeyman name Osama bin Laden, fired several missiles from a cave in Afghanistan into the WTC, the Pentagon and the ground in Shanksville.

Judge and Jury - the 'in-your-face' acts of the morning of 9-11 (numerous missiles fired into buildings where Americans were being slaughtered), those acts were so serious that there are reasons to think that these criminals will commit almost any crime to maintain the gang's power over the people.

I wish to borrow a few lines from a New York Citizens' Complaint filed October 28, 2004 and amended November 19, 2004: "We firmly believe that we are able to show probable cause for convening a Grand Jury and that we present herein the necessary facts and lines of inquiry that would lead reasonable persons to believe that numerous still-unsolved crimes have taken place..."

Many of these thugs Your Honor, are seasoned criminals and they must do hard labor and receive lashes per week as part of their punishment. We cannot afford to place them in crime colleges (prisons) so that they can hibernate and plan more vicious crimes.

One of the critical mistakes of the American al Qaeda operatives, was there identification of the 'planes' that struck the targets, and the 19 hijackers. You see, (a) if they identified the 'planes' then we have reason to charge them with criminal negligence for failure to intercept those craft, having tracked them to their targets; (b) all passengers and thugs in the 'planes' were dead; so who identified the hijackers by their names and photos?
This al Qaeda network Your Honor, is managed by a Board that include Mr. B (a.k.a.) Mr. Big. Kindly note that I have not scheduled Mr. Big for questioning at this inquiry.


The decision of this Court will have international implications when it is uncovered that dozens of countries lost their citizens as a result of a scam by well known terrorists. Consequently, there has to be a Shadow group to take the reins once the culprits are arrested. Failure to do so, will cause mayhem when these al Qaeda terrorists leave the vacuum in the 'Administration'.

The Prosecution has reasons to believe that some of those 9-11 passengers worked on sensitive projects; and had they been alive, they could have implicated the culprits in the crime. This Prosecution also notes that within months after 9-11 dozens of bio-chemists just all drop dead under mysterious circumstances. It appears that these experts knew too much; or, they were killed because the 9-11 thugs had plan a massive bio attack and wanted to wipe out persons who could suggest or invent remedies for the viruses.

The prosecution also has reason to believe that the victims at the Pentagon were carefully selected; and some of them could have known about the trillion-dollar scam.

The prosecution would like an excavation team to check for evidence on land and in the Atlantic.

I urge this Court to order an allotment of 40 million dollars (from the State) for Prosecution, defense lawyers and research. I will also require 20 top lawyers for the defense, because the only way they can win is via a miracle from God.

Judge, I urge you please to seize all the assets (accumulated since 9-11) of these al Qaeda operatives - and it is quite a lot. No asset gained as a result of the murder of Americans shall be used to defend these culprits once I have identified them in this Court. You see, Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen, September 11, 2001 was the greatest scam since prostitution. Elements of the 9-11 conspiracism were handsomely paid off.

Consider these:

(a) 2.3 trillion dollar Pentagon fraud

(b) 240 billion Brady bond swindle

(c) 100 million WTC gold robbery

(d) 7 billion WTC insurance scam

(e) The (15 billion) Put Options scam

(f) Other 9-11 property damage insurance scams

(f) War on terror financial scam

(g) Katrina scam

(h) Tsunami scam

(i) 27.5 trillion-dollar Ameri-Trust (Leo Wanta)

(j) Bird flu scam

Have we really digested the fact that if it hadn't been for The Jersey Girls (Breitweiser, Kleinberg, van Auken and Casazza) there would never have been even the few sham bogeymen hearings?

There is also high praises for patriot and true American, Mrs. Ellen Mariani.

A few persons have asked: "Why only The Jersey Girls' , a few citizens and Mrs. Mariani crying out for justice?"

Two answers come to mind immediately: (a) If one did not care for his/her partner and suddenly an opportunity came that he/she was 'done in'; and, some loot came as a result; would the beneficiary be upset? Hell no! (b) How many persons have the guts to seek justice by any means necessary? It is a disgrace that the answer is: Just a few. And, how many people know the facts?

For too long, well-known thugs have been committing crimes against the populace; some to justify their legitimacy and others just to carry out plain old criminal activities. These same individuals then use the said crimes to enact draconian laws that place the victims, the said populace, in straight jackets. Enough is enough!

The trial of these al Qaeda members should last no more than 8 weeks.

I urge this Court to be vigilant and do not entertain incessant hanky panky motions and delay tactics by the defense. I further note that the defendants will be identified after the preliminary hearing.

It is clear that certain members of the al Qaeda team have been capitalizing on the public ignorance, and have been committing some barefaced criminal activities, and have not been punished because they control the political and judicial systems.

Military officers and other persons who hold knowledge to this vicious crime are afraid to come forth because they are afraid. They hear their top bosses talking about '...outrageous conspiracy theories', and they believe that they wil be murdered like dozens of persons who held information about the JFK murder.

This prosecution urges the whistleblowers to come forward - because, as it was in the JFK case; those who thought that they were safe, were still murdered even after several years.

Your Honor, one former President warned regarding the Military Industrial Complex. Recently an FBI Director warned about the patriotic right-wingers. I say that the national security of these United States is at risk by a lunatic patriotic fringe who want power and wealth.

One critical question to ask some of these persons who say bin Laden and 19 terrorists did 9-11, is: 'Then my friends, if Osama bin Laden did 9-11, why are you stonewalling investigations, suppressing data and calling people's views 'outrageous conspiracy theories'?

We may want to ask two other very critical questions: 'My friends, why are you preventing the alleged terrorists from testifying in public? How can the terrorists' testimony damage the national security of the United States?

The following is a comprehensive overview of the points to be argued for the indictment of these al Qaeda thugs:

(1) Your Honor, the 9-11 al Qaeda thugs were, and are too presumptious. They try to tell us that three concrete and steel structures fell completely as a result of fire in one day. They say that the attacks were as a result of the work of 19 A-rab terrorists; 15 of whom were let into the United States via visas under the questionable Express Visa Scam. This scam let these terrorists in regardless of the answers to questions on their visa applications. For example, when asked where they were heading in the US, some terrorists merely replied by naming the cities. It should be carefully noted that when officials of the embassy questioned the granting of visas to the thugs, they (officials) were told to shut up.

Take agent Mohammed Atta - he was tracked in Germany. The secret security services watched him prepared for the terror attacks in the United States as far back as 2000.
While observing him in Germany, for obvious reasons the infamous CIA did not tell the BKA or any other German security services.

Then, on May 18, of 2000, guess what! The United States embassy granted him a visa. For what reasons did the embassy grant Mohammed Atta a visa to enter the United States?

Then imagine that about seven of the alleged 19 hijackers were still alive after 9-11, and the Conspiracy of Dunces (COD), did not call them in for serious interviews.

The WTC buildings fell while meeting no resistance. This demonstrate that the vertical support systems were removed by explosives.

(2) The al Qaeda thugs are trying to hoodwink us via a classic 3 card monte. The prime suspect in this case had plans prior 9-11 to conduct mock attacks on the Pentagon, World Trade Center and also to shoot down a jet over the Atlantic. No doubt that was where one or more of the 9-11 doomed Flights were shot down.

(3) The records reflect that our intelligence services knew some of these terrorists as far back as project Bojinka. In the case of Mohammed Atta he was recruited and monitored, and was a focus of Project Able Danger.
It should be noted that Atta's father said that he spoke to his son after September 11, 2001. And incidentally, at least one of the 9-11 scammers has been reportedly caught in Europe posing a 'heavy disguise'.

(4) What the experts say:
"The plane that hit the South Tower on 9/11 was not United Airlines flight 175." Colonel George Nelson (Ret.)
"The plane seen in various video clips of the attack could not have been UA flight 175..." Glen Standish 20-year veteran airline pilot
"The plane does not fit in that [Pentagon] hole." Major General Al Stubblebine (Ret.)
"They [buildings] were over-designed to withstand almost anything - including hurricanes...bombings and an airplane hitting [them]." Hyman Brown

The North East Zone of the United States is heavily protected. Any official crackpot who attempts to tell you that two planes left bases and stayed in the air for more than 15 minutes without being intercepted, should be taken in for questioning. Parts of the following quote highlighted in red by this writer:

"I am a pilot...when I lose my transponder...I am usually instructed to stay below 3500 feet and return to the airport. The reason for the concern is that I am a hazard to navigation...If that same flight loses communication with the controllers as well, the controller work load takes another giant step upward. Keep in mind that this is in an area [North East] that is normally stretched to the breaking point with controller overload. This flight is now a hazard to air navigation...Alarms all over the country would be going off. One interesting piece of information is the recording of controller and pilot conversations. These tapes are a matter of public record...These [9-11] tapes would show the response of the system. Where are they?... Otis Airforce base is only five minutes from Manhattan by F15...Airman's Information manual I brought, has a date of 1989 and it describes intercept procedures...there is an Air defense Intercept Zone...This Zone is constantly being movers [F15 & F16] would not need to be scrambled. They can be diverted from routine patrol and training flights for the intercept...The odds are that many flights would be on patrol just off shore...most improbable that even one commercial flight could go more than ten minutes without being intercepted...Interceptions are routine daily occurrences...The fact that they didn't happen under extreme provocation raises some serious questions..." Michael Guillaume (Pilot)

(5) On September 11, 2001, several of the hired thugs did NOT show up for work. This placed the Conspirati into a quagmire. There were three buildings to be destroyed and only two 'planes'; and the third building, the WTC 7, was already loaded with explosives. So, stupidly, the Conspirati decided to 'pull it' in the afternoon.

(6) The idea of a conspiracy theory has long gone. There is no imbroglio or hyperbole in the argument that states that 9-11 was bareface murder by al Qaeda members, some of whom we all know. Have we investigated the 2.3 trillion-dollar scam?

(7) Now clearly, no sane individual believes that two 'planes' struck two concrete and steel buildings and they fell to the ground, and then another steel and concrete building just got the fever and fell to the ground also.

(8) Construction steel starts melting at 2800 degrees. And, even if the jet fuel could melt steel, it would have to be concentrated in a furnace - not burning in open space and evaporating within a few minutes. Furthermore, the smoke at the WTC went black within minutes until the remote detonation of the explosives began.

(9) I reject the bogus hypotheses presented by so-called experts who suggest that the jet fuel caused the columns and strusses to buckle. You see, this scam cannot work this time. The firefighters who were ascending and descending the WTC did not report any fuel draining down the floors. The fuel burned and evaporated in the upper floors and thus had absolutely nothing to do with lower floors. Furthermore, the fuel contained in a 767 could not melt so many strusses and columns to cause a total collapse.

Videos of the collapse of the towers show free fall - indicating that they were brought down by explosives. For further review of implosions please refer to controlled demolition videos.

(10) The official records conclude that there was a man on the Wool Worth building firing missiles into the WTC to create spaces that would resemble that of aircraft impact. However, upon close inspection it was discovered that the holes did NOT have the signatures of the impacts of a 757 or 767. There is also evidence to suggest that missiles may have been fired from aircraft into the WTC. Then, we take note that the thugs detonated the pre-positioned explosives that brought down the towers:
"It [WTC2] started exploding...It was about the 70th floor. And each second another floor exploded out for about eight floors, before the cloud obscured it all...I saw small explosions on each floor..." Milanytch

(11) Yo Honor, there was no meaningful investigation - no Blue Ribbon Commission, nothing! Except a few politically contrived sham hearings.
"Considering the catastrophic incidents of September 11, 2001, certain troubling but irrefutable conclusions must be drawn from the known facts...As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more; a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains, that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." Colonel George Nelson (Retired)

(12) Your Honor I will prove that many of the participants were simply obeying orders; and after they found out that 9-11 was a scam, they are afraid to come forth with the details - because, as we saw in the JFK scam dozens of participants were subsequently murdered - even some who thought that they were safe. We note that several whistleblowers evidence which were ignored by the WhiteWash Commission.

(13) On September 11, 2001, several landmarks of these United States were destroyed by missiles. These alleged perpetrators were in the skies from about 8:25 am until roughly 10:06 am. Thus the Military must be held accountable for its failure to intercept and disable the alleged craft.

(14) Most of the Top Dogs went AWOL, some were scholars prior 9-11 and became idiots on 9-11, others are pleading the 5th.

(15) No Military apparatus intercepted any of the missiles, yet the nation's top snoop stated:
"...the barbaric acts against our country...The images of fire and destruction are forever etched in our minds...The response yesterday - from our Counter-Terrorism Center, the Ops Center, Global Support, our entire Security Staff, and many, many others - was absolutely magnificent..." George Tenet

Would anyone mind telling us what Tenet was thanking people for?

(16) Were these attacks as a result of lack of formal procedures?
Hell no!
FAA Order 76104J7-1-2:
"The escort service [Fighter jet] will be requested by the FAA hijack coordinator by direct contact with the national Military Command Center (NMCC)"

"In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA..." CJCSI 3610.01A

It appeared that prior 9-11 quite a few rules were changed. In the case of 'intercepting' rogue craft, that procedure was changed slightly; and during the critical stages of the attack, the key authority who should give intercept or shoot-down orders, was no where in sight.

As if they take all of us for fools, most of the 'top dogs' relinquished their posts on 9-11 so that they could claim that they did not know about the hijackings.

(17) Did the FAA notify the proper authorities?

Yes! One key piece of evidence that many persons overlooked is the fact that during the initial stages of the attacks, NORAD official admitted getting a note advising him of the hijackings. However, during his testimony to the whitewash Commission, he blatantly denied having knowledge of the said attacks. I conclude therefore, that an official would have absolutely no reason to be protecting Osama bin Laden, by giving false information.

(18) Your Honor the United States Military is not staffed by a bunch of crackpots as the al Qaeda bosses try to tell us. The data is clear that the Military apparatus of the United States could not have been caught with its 'pants down' for approximately two hours. That claim alone about the inibility to intercept, warrants court martial of the 'top dogs' of the Military.

(19) The F15 aircraft can reach over 20,000 feet in under three minutes. It then travels about 1800 miles per hour. The F16 can travel about 1500 miles per hour.

This means, that even if the craft had to travel across the entire United States; at least the Flight 93 would have been intercepted.

(20) We hear some very cunning and convenient argument that there were no available jets at McGuire and Andrews. This account by any Military officer is gross stupidity. If you follow the conspirati there were hardly any bases equipped with fighter jets on September 11, 2001.

There is absolutely no explanation from the Military that can take them out of this one; except that they were given 'slow-down' or 'stand-down' orders by top al Qaeda bosses. It was also evident that the Conspirati gangsters sent the fighter jets into no-man's land on that Tuesday.

(21) We note the testimony of Norman Y - that he heard the 'Master-at-the-Controls' giving orders on 9-11. The prosecution concludes that: (a) The master-at-the-controls ignored the fact that a rogue craft was coming in and, (b) The stinger missiles at the Pentagon must have gotten stuck.

(22) There were inordinate specific warnings about the impending attacks. Approximately 52 to the FAA and numerous other warnings from intelligence sources and individuals. However, those gangsters ignored the warnings and carried out the plan.

(23) Some of those culprits who knew about the attacks were, and are being rounded up and either tortured and murdered because of the information they hold. Records show that 'quite a few' of those 'terrorists' that were rounded up were murdered.

Just in case any one thought that 'terrorists' were hunted down and killed because of potential terrorist action; it is not so. Since September 11, only cosmetic security precautions have been put in place to protect the American people.

(24) Most of the activities put in place and labeled 'anti-terror', were put in place to give elements carte blanche over the United States citizenry; spying powers, and the power to do anything and get away with it by classifying the facts and labelling it 'top secret'.

(25) One action that grossly implicates the al Qaeda terrorists, is the refusal of the said al Qaeda terrorists to allow suspected terrorists in detention to testify in open court or any forum for that matter - in fear that these terrorists may just yell who ordered September 11th.

(26) Were those attacks as a result of a 'Nicodemus' by terrorists?

Hell no!

Former Federal Prosecutor John Loftus: "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive, that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence."

(27) I urge this Court to allow certain details of the JFK murder to be submitted here in order to demonstrate that the COD has a history of similar crimes.

(28) I further submit that al Qaeda is a network of political thugs, secret services and gangsters - that the said al Qaeda is really a '...way of working', according to one member.

(29) I intend to prove Yo Honor, that the al Qaeda thugs merely pulled out Operation Zipper, dusted it off and made a few changes to become Operation 'Avenging Angels' 9-11.

(30) I intend to prove that the 'planes' that destroyed the targets were in fact assisted by several missiles.

(31) In support of my argument Your Honor, I will prove that a few of the culprits of Operation Zipper, though old and wrinkled and dried up, were still alive and were masterminds in 9-11.

(32) I will also prove that there were several shooters in Dealy Plaza - that the President was hit approximately 4 times with 'ice bullets' and other rounds; some filled with Mercury.

(33) To substantiate my argument that the 9-11 al Qaeda thugs were well capable of masterminding the scam; I will submit evidence to prove that no one fired from the Book Depository; that the 'Pistol Rifle' was fired from close range. This 'pistol rifle' (photo shown) could fire various kinds of bullets.

(34) We will see the evidence that most of the shooters of JFK were very close to him. As you will recall Senator yarborough smelled 'gunpowder' all the way to Parkland. This meant that guns were fired at ground level, not from any book building as The Arlen tried to con the populace...We will see a video of a conspirator signalling to The SS men to move out of Harm's Way as the President's Limo approached the killer's circle.

(35) I will also demonstrate Your Honor, that the thugs in 9-11 and Zipper were extremely barefaced - that the so-called tramps (and the two policemen escorting them) were all involved in the President's murder. That the officer did not file reports and the Conspiracy of Dunces (COD) did not ask for reports.

(36) I will submit evidence Your Honor to prove that WTC 7 as well as WTC 1 and 2, were brought down by controlled demolition, Thermite and THEL (tactical high energy laser).

The fact that Silverstein stated that he ordered his men to 'pull it' makes him a key witness in this case. You see, when a speaker says: 'Pull it', he means only two things. Pull an object towards him, or detonate an object.

The question is now why detonate? If there was a reason to detonate, when did Silverstein place the explosives in WTC 7? In either case, it proves that WTC 1 and 2 may have also had explosives in them. Then the conjecture becomes fact - when we see the explosions, and hear from numerous witnesses.

(37) It appears that although the aviation authorities knew very well that all the 9-11 Flights went into the Atlantic, these authorities were over ruled and the Conspirati decided to publish its own bogus version of events.

(38) In the following account we note that United Airlines knew that Flight 175 DID NOT crash into the WTC, but it could not tell the public exactly where it crashed:
"United Airlines Flight 175: "A Boeing 767 crashes. The flight was bound from Boston to Los Angeles. It carried 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight attendants. The airline would not say where that plane crashed."
Seattle Times (09/11/01)
San Francisco Chronicle (09/11/01)
AP (09/11/01)
Atlanta Journal-Constitution (09/11/01)
ABC (09/11/01)

(39) I intend to urge this Court to produce the following individuals and agencies to provide evidence:
Dr. Ray Griffin, Dr. Peter Phillips, Michael Rectenwald Ph.D., Jim Marrs, Michael Rupert, The Great Rummy, General Dick (Ret.), The dirty Mossad, George J. Tenet, The 9-11 Commissioners, Arlen, un-edited JFK classified files, James Files, General Larry, General Montague, Colonel Scott, Wolf Ph.D., Martin Y. Tony B, Miss Jamie, The Dov, The Goss, Ashcroft, Jane G, Chertoff, Rosebud, Poppy Sr, Agent Osama bin Laden a.k.a. Tim Osman, The Saudi Crown, Tom Kenney, Silverstein, Fienberg, Eisenberg, Hallerstein, Dan Lewin, Al Abraham, Zackheim, Greenberg, French Intel, Kerik, Johnstown ATC, Cleveland ATC, Rudolph Giulliani, Naudet Brothers, The Buffett, Condi, German Intel, MI5, MI6, Pentagon officials who searched their grounds on the morning of 9-11, FAA, NEADS, NRO, The SS, NMCC, PEOC, Andrews AFB, Otis AFB, NYFD, NY Port Authority, FEMA, WTC insurers, Securacom, Fiduciary Trust, Ptech, Mitre, ISI, Karl Schwarz, Waymark Group, Mohammed Atta, Jack A, Sandy B, GaryBest, Turkish American Consul, Giffen...

(40) Your Honor the mere fact that the Conspirati gave crash sites, implicate them in the 9-11 caper. Their identification of the 9-11 hijackers so quickly, showing photographs, implicate them in 9-11. Their identification of 19 hijackers implicate them in 9-11. And, critically, anyone who attempted to tell us what transpired in the planes is a hostile witness in the 9-11 case because no one survived the crashes. I say this because we assumed that no one had any knowledge of the activities of these craft on the morning of 9-11 and that was what accounted for the FAA, Military and NORAD doing absolutely nothing to protect the country.

(41) For one to come up with specific data a few days after 9-11, showing hijackers and their photographs, including their whereabouts prior 9-11 - this individual should be considered critical in our investigations.

(42) I intend to prove that Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93 did NOT crash at the sites indicated - that in the case of Flight 11, it was sailing in the sky to its demise over the Atlantic well after they claim that it crashed in the WTC:
Manager, New York Center: "...We're watching the airplane, I also had conversation with American Airlines, and they've told us that they believe that one of their stewardesses was stabbed and that there are people in the cockpit that have control of the aircraft..."

At 9:21 a.m:
FAA: "... I just had a report that American 11 is still in the air, and it's on its way towards - heading towards Washington...
NEADS: "Okay. American 11 is still in the air?"
FAA: "Yes."...
NEADS: "Okay. So American 11 isn't the hijack at all then...?"
FAA: "No, he is a hijack"
NEADS: "He - American 11 is a hijack?"
FAA: "Yes."

(43) Your Honor there are serious questions to be answered regarding the way in which suspects were given carte blanche to present testimony. For example the 'wild west' tactic of no oath, no witness, no photographs, no video and no recording. And most presumptious - the joint testimony to ensure that none testified against the other.

(44) The forensic evidence at the WTC and Pentagon were tampered with before investigations could be conducted - that alone is a criminal offense. Furthermore the cunning way in which the steel from the WTC were removed and sold, leaves a lot of questions.

(45) Why none of the pilots initiated their IFF codes?

(46) Considering that everyone on the crafts were presumed dead; which of the passengers identified the hijackers?

(47) Secret Security Service Report: (SMOKING GUN)
"Based on a review of all source reporting over the last five months, we believe that UBL [Osama bin Laden] will launch a significant attack against U.S. and/or Israeli interests in the coming weeks. The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning..."

Firstly, if the security services were so informed, how did they get 'caught with their pants down'?
Secondly, it is plausible to suggest that the writer had intimate knowledge of the impending attacks.
Consult your psychologist folks! No sane human being writes about an impending attack on his own home, and describes it as 'spectacular'.
Thirdly, the writer stated '...Attack preparations have been made...' This clearly shows that the writer had specific knowledge about the impending attacks.

(48) We note that a few men wrote the PNAC document and called for 'a new Pearl Harbor'. And as a miracle, these same individuals are benefitting from the new Pearl Harbor.

(49) Your Honor, the 9-11 thugs were very barefaced. I always said that if I could find out who named WTC 'Ground Zero', I could identify the 9-11 thugs. 'Ground Zero' refers to a nuclear blast site - plain and simple!

Imagine that in Marion, Alabama the al Qaeda bosses set up a terrorist training camp called 'Ground Zero, USA'.

In this camp, terrorists used police cars and school buses as targets. This caught the attention of Marion Police Chief Tony Buford. Buford told ABCNews:
'It was rumored that the camp here was used as training site for possible people that were sent here to do bodily harm to Americans.'
To date, few persons have connected the dots between Ground Zero USA, and Ground Zero, WTC, New York.

(50) No plane the size of a 757 or 767 flew into the Pentagon on 9-11. None! Early damage photo shows that there was just a small hole that could have been the missile that Rummy spoke about.

(51) In March of 2001, we were given a hint as to the plans of al Qaeda. X-Files spin off showed US plot to hijack a Boeing 727 and crash it into the WTC, and then blame foreign terrorists.

(52) In August of 2001 Raytheon (lost several execs on 9-11), collaborated with an air force to test GPS landing systems on a 727.

(53) According to the great 9-11 Commission, the order to shoot down aircraft on 9-11 was given 28 minutes after Flight 93 was shot down. That is, an order given when the culprits knew well that mission was accomplished.

(54) And if this one is not a 'kicker' - at 6:47 am on 9-11, WTC's fire alarm was placed on an 8 hour TEST mode (NIST)

(55) According to Newsday, a few days before 9-11, security arrangements at WTC were modified.

(56) Near Pentagon, video of Citgo and adajacent hotel consficated immediately by the G-Men.

(57) Five of the 9-11 hijackers procured their training at US military bases. So, as if we are all idiots, al Qaeda is trying to tell us that Osama bin Ladin and his few dunces, shutdown the United States and launched an attack!

(58) Both US and British secret services had operatives in al Qaeda. I believe that the operatives were at high levels. For example, two former British agents claim that al Qaeda was recruited to have the Lybian leader 'done in'.

(59) Multiple fire units launched an operation near Pentagon under the guise of putting out an apartment fire. It so happened that they were just there to fight the Pentagon fire when the missile struck. You see, the al Qaeda operatives wanted to protect their offices.

(60) As far back as 1999 NORAD was conducting exercises depicting planes striking the WTC and the Pentagon. (USA Today). October 2000, Pentagon conducted emergency training exercises of mock passenger plane crashing into the said Pentagon. (Army). April 2001 NORAD again requested a war games event depicting a terrorist group using a commercial airline to attack the Pentagon (Boston Globe). August of 2001 Tony Blair group sent 25,000 troops to Oman near Afghanistan dubbed Operation Swift Sword. (BBC). September 7, signatory of the New Pearl Harbor Jeb Bush put the Florida National Guard on alert (World Net Daily). All this pre-planning, and on September 11, 2001 we heard that every one became total idiots.

(61) Of all the surveillance tapes at Pentagon and WTC, only one bogus copy shown to the public.

(62) 9-11 scammers tried to pull a 'fast one' by allowing an unprecedented event - victims families listening to cockpit tapes.
No attorneys allowed; no tapes allowed, no video allowed. Why? When these lay persons left the session, they would be as clueless just like the moment they went it. This listening scam was to 'lay the matter to rest'.
(63) An APB was published advising that Osama bin Laden was wanted. However, the smoking gun was this. The bulletin did not blame bin Laden for the 9-11 attacks:

"Murder of U.S. nationals outside the United States: conspiracy to murder U.S. nationals outside the United States: Attack on a Federal facility resulting in death.Usama bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States embassies in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people in addition: bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."

(64) The Security Services were conducting several war games on the morning of 9-11. This tactic is typical when these entities are carrying out a clandestine operation. The staff manning the operations centers may have saw the WTC falling, but would have thought that those incidents were a part of the war games.

(65) Fighter jets at Andrews AFB out on mysterious mission at sea - thus when there was need for jets to intercept Flight 77, 'no one was home'.

(66) The Conspirati, including unknown airline elements, arranged to transport under 200 passengers in the four Flights. Reason? So that all those passengers could fit into Flight 93.

(67) Several executives from WTC having meeting at UFB with the Buffett. Then they were later joined by Mr. B.

(68) George W. 'Poppy Junior' Bush, President and 'Commander-in-Chief ' of the US Armed Forces went AWOL during the most critical moments of the United States history; and claimed that he was trying to get out of 'harm's way'. It should be carefully noted that the said Commander-in-Chief did not really change his itinerary on Black Tuesday morning, and he gave his 9:30am presentation as scheduled. He was told prior entering Emmer Booker that something was going on, and he was told: 'America is under attack' while in Emmer Booker. And, here is the kicker - he admitted that he saw the first impact at the WTC. How could he have seen it? The Military has an agency that supplies such live 'feeds' to its Commander-in-Chief. Critically, when the said Commander-in-Chief left Florida, he did NOT have military escorts.

(69) Although Ari blatantly lied to the American people about lack of warnings regarding 9-11, this prosecution notes as follows:

(a) In June of 2001 an alleged terrorist provided data regarding the 9-11 attacks. (b) Ex-con/agent Vreeland provided data regarding the impending attacks. Although most laymen will refute Vreeland's claims, I KNOW that many agents have no application form or data on any file - many just have numbers. (c) In June of 2001, countdown time - the department of defense modified hijack rules (DoD). (d) July of 2001, a known terrorist who was well-known to the Conspirati, and who had been indicted in 1996, was given visa under the Express Visa Scam. (e) About two months prior 9-11 the fools banned weapons in cockpits, and after 9-11 they not only placed weapons in cockpits but in the passenger aisle. (f) U.S. Officials warned of 'spectacular' attacks (see quote). (g) The dirty Mossad, as usual, with its cunning Modus Operandi, advised the U.S. regarding an attack by exactly 19 terrorists. (We take note that the dirty Mossad always have very specific data on incidents of terror against the United States.) (h) In August, believe it or not, the alleged wicked Taliban, advised the US regarding an attack by agent Osama bin Laden. How cunning were the Conspirati to ignore the warning, and then later attack the said Taliban. (This was the job done on Lee Harvey in the JFK case. The said young man who incessantly tried to warn the President was the same man accused and shot for the murder which he knew nothing about.) (i) One of the most specific of warnings was the memo entitled: 'bin Laden Determined to Strike in US. (Fox, ABC). (j) Critically - the Jane's FAA received about 52 warnings about possible attacks. And it should be specifically noted, that elements of the said FAA indicated the kind of attack preferred.

(70) The Battle Station for General Dick Myers on the morning of 9-11 was the NMCC. This was not a discretionary duty - this was mandatory.

(71) Who manipulated the EPA to report false data about the air quality in New York immediately after 9-11?

(72) Who banned the taking of photos at the WTC on September 11, 2001? Was this Rude Boy Rudi?

(73) Who was this top dog who manned the Battle Station of the Northern al Qaeda base on 9-11? What time did he leave his post at the WTC 7?

(74) Who ordered the tampering of the forensic evidence at the WTC and the Pentagon?

(75) We have been hearing about classified records and secrecy since September 11, 2001. For many naive persons - such classified records and secrecy are justified to protect the national security of these United States. But are the culprits worried about the security of the United States, or their own security? Let us explore.

Numerous individuals and organizations warned several US security agencies about the impending attacks. There is no denial there. Actually, the plot was so explosive, only imbiciles or gangsters would have carried it out on September 11, 2001.

We note that the US unloaded millions of dollars on the Taliban prior 9-11. These Taliban could not have been so wicked if so much money was given to them. In fact, the 'wicked' advised the United States regarding an impending attack by agent Osama bin Laden.

Surprisingly, it was the said Taliban who was exterminated soon after. Something is therefore fishy.

After the defeat of the Taliban we heard about this 'enemy combatants' term. What does this mean? Enemy means Foe and Combantants mean persons engaged in combat - plain and simple. The Geneva Convention did not exclude certain combatants from its rules and regulations.

Why called them 'enemy combatants?

(In the present political climate, where the Third World mendicants will not speak up for their citizens because of the crumbs from the gangsters; these gangsters can do anything and get away with it.)

The Conspirati needed a scapegoat. By calling them 'enemy combatants' you really do not have to recognize them as human beings. But why?

We have heard about some high-profile arrests - masterminds they were supposed to be. Where are they? After four years not one brought to trial. Why? Well they will say that Moussaoui came to trial! But did he? A man who was kept in solitary confinement and then came to plea guilty cannot be judged by the public as guilty. The public did not hear one single testimony that warranted a guilty plea. As a matter of fact, the agents who initially tried to apprehend Moussaoui were stonewalled - as if someone wanted him to be free until the 9-11 job was done.

Did any of the masterminds testify for or against Moussaoui? How did we ascertain that Moussaoui was the 20th hijacker?

We have never heard a testimony from one of the alleged masterminds. Why?

What could a foreign thug say that could damage the national security of the United States? Answer: absolutely nothing!

We know that if the terrorist sought data from the United States, the said United States could say that such data would infringe upon its national security. But, the testimony of the terrorist alone could not, and cannot damage the nation's national security; unless, some persons had business with the terrorists; and were, and are afraid that the terrorists may just point them out to the public.

Let's dig deeper. In Europe more than one terror cases went to court and the prosecution requested the testimony of the alleged 9-11 masterminds. The requests denied. Why?

The answer: Any mastermind of 9-11 who is allowed to testify publicly will divulge information that the Conspirati does not want us to hear - information that could place the said Conspirati in handcuffs.

Now back to the Taliban. There seemed to be three reasons for that attack - TAP, Poppy and the information the Taliban held.

Why Iraq? We can presume that the reasons were contained in the words: avenge, oil and information. Consider that Uday and Oday held critical data regarding the specifics of the 9-11 operation; and Oday actually relay that data to a well-known president - Oday's head had to roll.

Recently an American Media House from Germany went to Camp Xray to gather data. They return empty-handed. Nil! No one allowed to speak to detainees. Why? Detainees being held indefinitely without charge. Why? I will enlighten you.

Consider that a man or a group from a certain organization heard or saw you commit a vicious crime. This man or group is not sophisticated blackmailers like the dirty Mossad - that is, they do not know how to plant data around the world as their 'pension' or 'retirement'. But they have the data - that which can send you to the big house the hangman. You get an oppertunity to capture members of this group. Would you let them go?

Can the Conspirati do such a thing? Oh yes!

In the 1993 WTC bombing one Salem testified that he recruited the terrorists and he even begged his G-men handlers to use dummy explosives in the bombing. Salem was overruled.

Salem lamented about the unpatriotic nature of his handlers.

Based on the testimony of Salem, that our own security men connived to make and plant explosives in the WTC and provided 'safe houses' for the terrorists; it is plausible to suggest that the thugs who masterminded 9-11, started immediately after the 1993 bombing; and that those 9-11 thugs are well known.

The data of that Court were revealed. The plan had similar components of 9-11. The terrorists were let in then and was let in for 9-11.

Imagine, that one of the terrorists was caught coming into the United States with a terrorist kit. Yes, that is what I mean; he was caught entering the United States with a terror kit prior WTC 1993 bombing. So, you ask, how the hell did he stay in the United States to plan the 1993 attacks.

The al Qaeda Conspirati let him in the country and gave him a 'slap-on-the-wrist' charge; and then allowed him to be remain in the country to plan the 1993 attacks.

(76) Why was the WTC fire burning for 100 days? Was the fire burning to eradicate the evidence?

(77) The Oral Histories of 9-11 give an insight into certain aspects of the crime. Critically, are the recordings of the New York Fire Department. Putting our tribal, religious and political affiliations aside, the 9-11 crime needs a thorough investigation. It should be carefully noted that any body which conducted an investigation into 9-11, and did not find citizens culpable, it has committed treason against the United States. Such a body could never have bypassed the recordings of the New York Fire Department.

Here are some of these recordings:

(a) Paramedic Kevin Darnowski: " I heard three explosions, and then...Tower Two started to come down." (NYT)

(b) Firefighter Thomas Turillli: " almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight." (NYT)

(c)Firefighter Ed Cachia: "It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit...we originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom; and then the tower came down." (NYT)

(d) Paramedic dan Rivera: "It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was - Do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear, 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop,?' "

(e) Tim Burke: "...the building popped, lower than the fire...I was going oh my God, there is a secondary device because the way the building popped. I thought it was an explosion." (NYT)

(f)Assistant Comish Stephen Gregory: "I thought...before...Number two came down, that I saw low-level flashes...I...saw a flash, flash, flash...You know like when they demolish a building?" (NYT)

(g) Firefighter Ken Rogers: "...there was an explosion in the South Tower...I kept watching - floor after floor after floor. One floor under another after looked like a synchronized kind of thing." (NYT)

(h) COMPLICITY BY NFD? Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac: "...there were definitely bombs in those buildings...many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings; but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it - because the 'higer-ups' forbid discussions of this fact." (Lavello)

(i) Firefighter Dick Banaciski: "...there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television...they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt; all these explosions." (NYT)

(j) Deputy Commissioner Tom Fitzpatrick: "It looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building...My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV." (NYT)

(k) File 911061 (Oral Histories 9-11) EMT Division Chief John Peruggia: "...Captain Nahmod and EMT Zarrillo approached...They indicated that the building [WTC 7]was being evacuated. I questioned as to what the nature of the evacuation was. I was told that it was not because of what was occurring across the street [WTC 1 & 2]. No one feared that the building was in danger...there were reports of a third plane that had been hijacked...He indicated if I knew the whereabouts of the Mayor. I told him that as I was approaching OEM and coming up Vesey, I saw a large contingency of gentlemen in suits exiting down Vesey Street...I recognized some of the people in that group as staff and TA's for the Mayor. I told him more than likely, that was probably the direction the Mayor went...the Mayor was out and the building was evacuated...this is not a scene where the thought of both buildings collapsing ever entered my mind. I was there in 1993...We were always told by everyone, the experts, that these buildings could withstand direct hits from airplanes...It's made to be hit by airplane..."

(78) Your Honor, the Prosecution has some revealing statistics from the National Transportation Safety Board regarding the 9-11 Flights.

(79) A few days prior September 11, 2001, Mr. B (a.k.a. Mr. Big) was at a location where one of the alleged terrorists also close by. On the morning of the attacks, 'terrorists' went and ask for an SS man by name. And, after it was known that 'terrorists' were in the area, Mr. B went for a little jog. Funny - because Senor Big would have been in Harm's Way while jogging.

(80) The Conspirati initially made up a story about terrorist calling AirForce One - one of, if not the most secure line on planet earth. If this actually happened, that call would have been placed by a top dog. And if it did not happen, where did this information come from?

(81) Securacom handled security for WTC, Dulles and United Airlines. A principal in this company was marvin P. Bush. What's funny about this? The Securacom security company was partially owned by KuwAm from Kuwait. It should be noted that the dirty Mossad operates out of several countries. This Mossad generally uses Arabs as patsies.

A few days prior 9-11 the culprits who masterminded the caper created a hightened security alert. This gave elements opertunity to inspect, dismantle and re-arrange things. For some reason, this hightended security was lifted before the attacks.

The exit doors to the roof of the WTC 1 and 2 were locked. Elevators were disbled.

Incidentally WTC 6 and 7 were evacuated soon after WTC 1 was struck; yet there were US citizen al Qaeda guards telling people to return to their offices.

There was no power for several days at the WTC. This meant that cameras did not work - giving the set-up culprits ample opportunity to rig the scam.

Stanley Praimnath worked at the WTC: "As soon as we reached the concourse level, the security guard stopped us and said: 'Where are you going?...Go back to your office.' "

Dan Baumbach worked at the WTC: He stated that security officers were telling people that things were ok: "You can try it [escape].' The security guard said. 'But it's at your own risk.' "

Is it normal for a security guard to ask a worker where he/she is going within a building where there are no restricted areas? Who was this security guard employed to?

Then the surveillance tapes of the WTC are all missing - stolen and discarded to hide the data.

(82) The metal antenna on top of the WTC building fell vertically as if someone held it while it descended. This suggests that certain form of implosion occured that allowed such a lengthly and heavy object to fall in such a fashion.

(83) Did the senior al Qaeda operatives 'prepare' the WTC for demolition? Here is a statement from Scott Forbes who worked for FT in the WTC: "On the weekend of [8-9 September, 2001], there was a 'power down' condition in...the South Tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approximately 36 hours from floor 50 up...The reason given by the WTC for the power down, was that cabling in the Tower was being upgraded...Of course without power, there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors...many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the Tower."

(84) Ben Fountain worked for Fireman's Fund. He spoke to People and stated that the Towers were evacuated: '...a number of times.'

(85) We find that the satanic masterminds 'pulled off' the same tricks as they did in the JFK caper. Imagine that hijacker Satam al Suqami's passport was found in pristine condition.

The rediculous thing about this find is that we heard that even metal 'evaporated' on 9-11. Yet a passport made of paper withstood the inferno and ended up on a Manhattan street.

Then, if that was not enough, the ID of victim SuzanneC, a passenger on Flight 77, was discovered in the Pentagon.

I deduce from these two accounts that the passengers whose ID's were found at those sites, were not at those locations.

Even the person who found the ID at the Pentagon (not a conspiracy theorist) claimed that that find was a big strange: "I remember thinking it was highly unusual and strange to find a perfectly intact ID card amidst all that devastation...I thought it was strange to find an ID in perfect shape when everything else around me was devastated." Captain Jim Ingledue, Virginia Beach Fire Department

(86) We heard that the alleged mastermind who manned the sophisticated fighter jet, had just finished reviewing flight manuals prior the deathly undertaking. As if the culprits take for fools, we are suppose to believe that this fellow undertood those technical manuevers as stated by the Conspirati. (This crap was the same told us about the shooting done by Lee Harvey Oswald. Careful note should be made that this Oswald fete could not be duplicated by experts.)

(87) The G-men captured two video cameras adjacent the Pentagon, yet not one shown to the public. Frankly, I ask myself the question: 'What are the aims and objectives of the FBI in the United States?'

(88) Flight 77 was in the air for quite a long time before it alleged crashed in the Pentagon. We know from the facts, that it did not. However, that Flight was a rogue for 40 minutes. Thus the military has no explanation at all for its failure to intercept.

Then we turn to the autopsy. Quite a suspicious procedure if you ask me!

Dr. Thomas Olmsted: "The AFIP (pathology report) suggest these numbers; 189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon and 64 were 'passengers' on the plane. The AA list only had 56, and the list just obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell 'victims' bodies from 'hijacker' bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference, and that makes it so...So I figured that the government would want to quickly dispel any rumors. It seemed simple: produce the names of all the bodies identified by the AFIP and compare it with the published list of passengers. So, I sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the AFIP and asked for an expedited response, because we were getting ready to send our boys to war on the pretext that osama/Sadaam had done the deed...Fourteen months later, a few US soldiers dead, many Iraqi civillians pushing up daisies, and I finally get the list. Believe me that they weren't a bit happy to give it up; and I really have have no idea why they cloose now to release it...No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three additional people not listed by American Airline, sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras. I did give American the opportunity to 'revise' their original list, but they have not responded...The AFIP claims that the only 'passenger' body that they were not able to identify is the todler, DanaF..., whose parents and young sister are on the list of those identified. The satanic masterminds behind this caper may be feeling pretty smug about the perfect crime, but they have left a raft of clues tying these unfortunates together."

(89) Several professional first responders were told that WTC 7 would collapse. In fact, some said that they were told not to put out the fire because the building would collapse. How would one have known that this building would collapse, really?

Medical worker De Wright reported: "...they measured out how far the building was going to come, so we knew exactly where we could stand...5 blocks away."

This is a critical statement.

Wright again: "...we were like, 'Are you guys going to put that fire out?' "

Chief Thomas McCarthy (via NYT) said: "...they were waiting for 7 World Trade to come down...They on three separate floors...just burning merrily. It was pretty amazing, you know - it's the afternoon in lower Manhattan, a major high-rise is burning, and they said, 'We know.' "

(90) Your Honor there is evidence stacked against the culprits than sand on the shores of the Atlantic. Imagine that the airline manefests did not show Arab names and no Arab body was recovered! One way out for the thugs is to say that the Arab bodies 'evaporated'. But, that wouldn't hold, because the authorities claimed that they identified all but one baby body at the Pentagon. Why did the al Qaeda thugs not produce 'bodies'? Answer: The foreign nations where the suspects came from would want the bodies for burial.

(91) Then, if the thugs weren't too barefaced - they shot missiles into the WTC from the Woolworth Building to create what would appear like entrance path for the planes. Looking at one video, one can notice that a very unusual thing happened - the entire 'plane' went into the steel and concrete building. Yet upon inspection we note that the footprints weren't those of any plane.

Two things happened here: (a) The videos we saw were fabricated - that is, we were watching a Hollywood-type movie (b) the alleged planes were specially made to evaporate on impact.

There is a critical need to call the Naudet Brothers to this Court for testimony. (We recall that in the JFK caper, several of the culprits were Corsicans.)


(a) "Someone had fired missiles at the World Trade center's North Tower from atop the nearby Woolworth Building." WNBC news

(b) "...we just had a second explosion, possibly a missile from the roof of the Woolworth Building." Port Authority Police Officer (WNBC news)

(c) "They're shooting at the Trade Center from the Woolworth Building." Radio Dispatch, NY Daily News

(d) "Woolworth Building! They're firing missiles from Woolworth Building!" Police Channel

Then, the tacticians passed by later and blew up the spot on the Woolworth Building where the missile-launcher was located.

(92) The Conspiracy of Dunces (COD) indicated that several calls were made from the illfated 'planes'. It seemed that the calls were made from a control station, because none of the calls were recorded by the phone companies.

(93) The Commander-in-Chief (please do not laugh), left Florida without military escorts. This is conclusive proof that his assistants did NOT believe that he was in eminent danger. Also, the SS men allowed him to remain in the classroom for several minutes, putting himself and the children at risk; unless of course, someone knew that no one was really at risk in that school.

(94) The Conspirati had depicted the 9-11 caper on cards, and currencies prior September 11, 2001.

(95) There was no air rescue at the WTC even though people were jumping out of the windows to their death. Authorities simply stood and looked.

What hurts, is that for over 100 minutes Americans and foreigners alike, jumped out of windows to their death, whil the world's most sophisticated emergency management system that was at the scene of the crime on 09/10/01 through 09/11/01, did not provide any significant rescue operation.

We heard from USA Today: ' least 200 people jumped to their deaths that morning...People jumped continuously during the 102 minutes that the tower stool. Two people jumped as the South Tower began to fall at 10:28 a.m...They jumped alone, in pairs and in groups...'

Eye-witness James Logozzo: 'It took three or four to realize - They werre people...Then one woman fell...The look on her face was shock...When she hit, there was nothing left...'

USA Today again: 'On the east side, people plummeted into the plaza...Blood covered the glass walls and revolving doors that led to the plaza from the ground-floor mezzanine in the North Tower. People evacuating the North Tower walked by this horrible sight...'

(96) Shortly after 9-11, the COD published an alleged confession video, depicting Osama bin Laden confessing to the crime. The person in that video WAS NOT bin Laden. What happened there? There was no apology for the bogus video and therefore this showed complicity between some of the persons who produced the video.

The International Blackmailing Terror Group from the Middle East made that video. You see, after they were seeing them dancing at the demise of America, they wanted to convince Americans regarding Muslim guilt. The bin Laden story was falling apart. (If we recall, it was this terror group that called the police and told them that some palestinians were in a van heading towards a target. When the police set up road blocks, it was the terror group that was nabbed. Had they succeeded in pinning the crime on the Palestinians, it would have carte blanche to eliminate the said palestinians.) The reason for this fake video include: (a) to made it appear that bin Laden was the mastermind (b) to implicate the US al Qaeda operatives. After publishing a bogus video like that one's credibility is exposed. (c) Blackmail.

(By the way, the said terror group produced a photo for the British al Qaeda thugs. In that photo it depicted the 'Jamaican' with one steel bar going through his head, one going behind him and another in front. If this photo was for real, the 'Jamaican' would have been standing and bending at the same time. Furthermore in rush-hour traffic it was unlikely that only the culprits would be seen in the railroad station. This was clearly a kind of Oswald-type superimposition. And, in that case we note that public inquiries were banned.)

Frankly Your Honor, it is time to assess whether some of the political and security establishments are protecting the citizenry, or, operating a gang that is a threat to the nation's national security.

(97) We still need to investigate the $100,000 sent to the alleged ringleader Mohammed Atta prior 9-11.

(98) Seismic data showed explosions at WTC on September 11, 2001.

(99) The 'planes' passed close to several military bases on 9-11 - a convincing proof that some fellows with military expertise were involved.

(100) The Conspirati is KNOWN to rig Commissions with either culprits or idiots. Generally culprits who can then rig the hearings. We note in this case where the United States military is the prime suspect; it controls the military tribunal and the cases of the alleged Enemy Combatants. In this case, no one except the masterminds will have control of the evidence. I refer you back to the FFK murder when the same tactics were used - the culprits controlled the evidence and the sham hearings.

(101) Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen, what happened on September 11, 2001 was a coup, not a terrorist attack. Imagine that Flight 11 left base at approximately 8:00 and spent approximately 47 minutes as a rouge flight.

Flight 175 departed 8:14 and spent 49 minutes as a rouge.

Flight 93 (the Cleveland scam) departed 8:42 and was out for approximately 1:22 minutes.

Flight 77 departed about 8:00 and went rouge for about 1:38 minutes.

Someone should have been sent to the ...squad. This scenario is for Hollywood. There is no way the world's alleged super power could allow this; and we need to investigate this crackpot theory before the world label us idiots. This scenario DID NOT happen, and it should not remain a historical legend.

(102) The John O'Neill Saga:

John O'Neill worked for counterterrorism. We know that during his tenure, al Qaeda in the Department crippled most of his efforts to bring down agent bin Laden and the al Qaeda operation. The US al Qaeda bosses would have done anything to allow September 11th.

It was then very strange, that after O'Neill resigned in protest, that he would have ended up working at the WTC under such a management.

Then it was also an imbroglio regarding who saw O;Neill at the WTC on Black Tuesday. Was he anywhere near Manhattan on September 11, 2001?

(103) Sheltering the Terrorists:

Your Honor, it is plausible to conclude that the alleged terrorists were sheltered and protected prior 9-11. We hear stories about security forces providing training for al Qaeda members. The dirty Mossad had its agents living stone-throw from the alleged hijackers. The said dirty Mossad telling the Washington gullibles about 19 terrorists trying to invade America. Was this information inside knowledge or heresay?

Not all in the FBI were 'on the take'. One report lucidly details an extraordinary account of how the alleged terrorists lived openly like kings prior 9-11. Terrorists on security services watch-list getting first class visas to enter the country.

FBI report: "...they [terrorists Hazmi & Mihdhar] did not attempt to hide their identities. Using the same names contained in their travel documents and known to at least some in the Intelligence Community, they rented an apartment, obtained driver's licenses from the state of California Department of Motor Vehicles, opened bank accounts and received bank credit cards, purchased a used vehicle and automotive insurance, took fling lessons at a local flying school, and obtained local phone service that included Hazmi's listing in the local telephone directory."

Your Honor, unless somebody takes us all for idiots, these activities carried out by Hazmi & Mihdhar, definitely had the assistance of Americans in very important positions. It was very unlikely that a visitor to the United States could have gone on his own, and secured the items and privileges outlined. As to bank accounts, several were opened and hundreds of thousands of dollars changed hands without a single red flag waved.

(104) We have reasons to conclude that Mohammed Atta was a defense intelligence agent for the dirty Mossad and that the said Mohammed did NOT die on September 11, 2001. We make note that the said dirty Mossad's modus operandi always place one of their agents to recruit, plan and guide a caper. Agent Salem of the said dirty Mossad was working with the FBI in the 1993 WTC bombing.

(105) Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of this Grand Jury, we have reasons to conclude that Flight 175 landed at Cleveland-Hopkins on Setpember 11, 2001; as did as the other ill-fated flights.

(106) We have plausible reasons to conclude that a former US secret service 'top dog' may have been about 400 feet below ground somewhere near a big house, assisting in the mid-south 9-11 operations known as Tripod II.

(107) The Conspitari later claimed that Arab bodies were found on 9-11 - but guess what? No one saw any body - the conclusion was based on a 'process of elimination'. We note here that the prime suspect in 9-11 conducted some of the critical investigations and thus held the findings and told us what they wanted us to hear.

(108) The 9-11 Commission was hand-picked, rigged in short. At least two of them posed conflict-of-interest.

(109) Mohammed Atta, the defense intelligence agent had ties with known local official thugs in Florida.

(110) We have reasons to believe that 'Sandy' stole some of the 9-11 most critical data on instructions from Bigs.

(111) Your Honor, Ladies & Gentlemen, I have observed this 9-11 tragedy with a 'pentagon' view. And, on every side that I look, I see the word 'scam'.

The following account are quotes from alleged hijackers. The point is, these quotes were NOT from any foreign terrorists, as I will explain:

"We have some planes. Just stay quit and you will be ok. We are returning to the airport."

"Everything will be ok. If you try to make any moves, you'll endanger your self and the airplane. Just stay quiet."

"...this is captain - please sit down. Remain sitting. We have a bomb on board..."

I am going back to the airport - they have met our demands..."

As we see here, these words were spoken by insiders, not foreign terrorists. In fact, these words were apparently spoken to calm the passengers so that the plane could land safely. The only words that would suggest a hijacking would be 'they have met our demands'. And certainly, 'demands' did not necessarily mean ransom.

Here we go again: "Nobody move - please we are going back to the airport...[do not] make any stupid moves." Guardian (10/17/01) NYT (10/16/01)

(112) Your Honor, the 9-11 attacks are no longer 'conspiracy theories' - those attacks were deliberate and premeditated criminal acts that could not have been done by an alleged Osama bin Laden and a few terrorists.

The following account by Dave Heller gives a lucid perspective of the attacks:

"...the focus of this article is on just one point: the odd collapse of the three buildings in the World Trade Center complex.

They collapsed in truly astounding fashion...WTC7 was a 47-story building that was not hit by an airplane or by any significant debris from either WTC1 or WTC2. Buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6 were struck by massive amounts of debris from the collapsing Twin Towers, yet none collapsed...The 9-11 commemorate videos produced by PBS and CNN are best. Both clearly show WTC7's implosion...WTC7...was the farthest of the buildings fromWTC1 and WTC2. WTC7 happened to contain the New York City Office of Emergency Management (OEM), a facility that was, according to testimony to the 9-11 Commission, one of the most sophisticated Emergency Command Centers on the planet...WTC7 mysteriously imploded and fell to the ground in an astounding 6.5 seconds...What struck me first was the way the second plane hit WTC2, the South Tower...United Airlines Flight 175, which weighed over 160,000 pounds and was traveling at 350 mph...The height of the South Tower is 1362 feet. I calculated that from that height, freefall in a vacuum (read, absolutely no resistance on earth) is 9.2 seconds. According to testimony provided to the 9-11 Commission, the tower fell in about 10 seconds. Other data shows it took closer to 14 seconds. So the towers fell within 0.8-4.8 seconds of freefall in a vacuum. Just like WTC7, this speed seemed impossible if each of the 110 floors had to fail individually...

(113) FEMA gave a rather unexpected silly response to the nation's most vicious attacks by 'terrorists'. In its response to the causes of the fires on 9-11 The FEMA stated: '...the specifics of the fires in WTC7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unkown at this time.'

Judge, Ladies and Gentlemen of this honorable Grand Jury, How could the alleged world's best emergency management system just dismiss the origin of the most suspicious fires as 'unknown'?

(114) How do we explain this - the FAA in spring of 2001 warned airports that if: '...the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable.' How could an agency of the United States making such a statement?

(115) Your Honor, of the dozens of video-cameras at the Pentagon and the airports, only two were shown; one of the Mossad agent, Mohammed Atta and another fuzzy one of the Pentagon incident. Where are the videos?

(116) Dirty Mossad agents on Flights shooting passengers? "The passenger in 9a [Lewin] was shooting the pilots and leading the hijacking."

(117) Ho Honor, the 9-11 thugs planned to try Moussaoui for the 9-11 attacks as far back as 2001. The 'White Jet' that tracked Flight 93 was said to be collecting data for the Moussaoui trial. The release of these tapes in 2006 just in time for the Moussaoui trial is very significant. Firstly, Moussaoui was on trial because, though he might have known about the plot, he did NOT have any intricate knowledge about the said plot. HE CANNOT IMPLICATE THE THUGS who masterminded the plot, so even if he took the stand all he could say was a lot of mumbo jumbo. Why not put the masterminds we heard of on trial? Heck no! You want these dudes call names? Why not send the masterminds to Europe to testify at those trials? Hell no! The masterminds would have spilled a lot of beans and pull down a few of our thugs.

(118) The 9-11 thugs were too dunce and barefaced - two exhibits worth mentioning are: (a) the pristine passport found in New York, and (b) the ID found at the Pentagon.

Listen now - although the planes disintegrated, those ID's were found intact!

(119) Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen of this Jury - the following account is the most lucid and technically defined piece (from unknown military source) on the demolition of the Twin Towers:
"...[The 9/11 operation consisted of the following activities:]
Military exercises by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) with 22 imaginarily hijacked planes on 9/11/2001, before and simultaneously with the “real” hijackings. Some of the defense interceptors flew to Alaska, as far as possible from the cities that were being attacked. All FAA Flight Termination Systems (FTS) were deactivated so that no “false groundings” of commercial planes would occur.

The operation involved the “hijackings” of four civilian aircraft, then substituting them with remote-controlled USAF aircraft or “drones”. It is certain that an operation this complex and sophisticated (even in the preparations of the demolition charges at the WTC) is not left to be handled by Arab lackeys armed only with carpeting knives. Plissken-Valentine, FTS by SPC or Pearl are well-documented available technologies on how the aircraft/attack portion of the operation was performed. Since the part of airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings was critical to the real aims of the operation there must have been a couple of reserve planes for the USAF - Boeing 767's and the Global Hawk. Alternatively, the Boeing 757 shot down in Pennsylvania might well have been a remote- controlled reserve plane utilized because of the NORAD exercises.

The booking of seats on certain pre-ordained flights was artificially kept low; those coast-to-coast flights were booked by 20% instead of the usual 75% in order to minimize deaths, which could cause problems if “highly connected” individuals were wantonly sacrificed. If the flights were real, the passengers on them had to die (or at least disappear). Two of the flights were probably nothing but fictitious, real only on radar screens, which minimized the amount of passengers to be murdered.

There was indeed placing of well executed put options with airline stocks and with specific re-assurance companies (American Airlines, United Airlines, Allianz, Munchener Re, Schweizer Re, AXA,…). Furthermore, the assurance values of the WTC were doubled in July 2001, at the same time the MOSSAD’s offices at the WTC were vacated. Bush’s Carlyle Group members were beneficiaries of these options - a very vital set of “smoking gun clues” that were completely ignored or conveniently forgotten by official “investigators” in the days, weeks, and months following the joint CIA/Mossad operation.

The camouflaging of six remote-controlled aircraft in order to make them look like Boeing 767's or 757's. The four planes probably were 2x USAF 767 tankers, a Global Hawk used to hit the Pentagon and a “real” 757 shot out of the air in Pennsylvania.

False tracks leading to “terrorists” using young Moslem-looking persons on CIA payroll, who take aviation classes in Southern USA and party at night clubs, were created.

Demolition preparations of the wing of the Pentagon that was under reparation. This was designed to collapse a horseshoe-shaped area of the building, which would seem to be caused by the crash of a Boeing 757 instead of the Global Hawk attack. This partly failed. There is photographic evidence of a small plane before the actual collapse of the wing of the Pentagon. The structures did not collapse until firefighters sprayed lots of water on the ceiling of the building.

Sophisticated demolition charge preparations of the WTC towers and WTC 7 to make them collapse completely and look to the untrained, gullible eye as if the buildings collapsed solely from the effects of gravity and burning fuel. Also the positioning of an electronic homing device in the towers and in the Pentagon in order to ensure the accurate hits of the remote-controlled aircraft was needed. Extra napalm was supplied for dramatizing the effects of hits of airliners. The WTC buildings would have been demolished in the exact same way completely with or without the airplanes hitting.

Ordering, preparing and transportation of the charges for the demolition of the WTC had to be done, no small feat to say the least. Solely for the steel pillars of the outer circle 40 x 240 charges were needed, let's say 10,000 thermite cutting charges each weighing 50 lbs for each tower. For WTC 7 at least 4000 charges were needed. Also at least one small thermonuclear hydrogen bomb for each of these three buildings was prepared. (Did the 9/11 “investigators” check into any demolition charge purchases over the prior year?)

Identifying critical need targets for the conspiracy in the WTC towers various offices. For example, there was a lot of evidence being gathered of world-wide economic crimes by Neocon Zionists. The FBI’s international division was located in WTC 1 in the floors from 22 to 24. (One case being investigated was the case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan brokered by Mobil Oil and Carlyle Group in Texas; also the ongoing evidence in the investigation of gold price fixing stemming from charges pending to go to Federal Grand Jury seeking indictments against Alan Greenspan, JP Morgan & Company, Rothschild & Sons, and Goldman Sachs.) The CIA maintained a large operations office in WTC 7. It is possible that some targets were attacked because of the unique opportunity exploitable where the human bodies and all evidence of the crimes automatically disappeared when a hydrogen bomb exploded. Explosions heard from the towers before the commencing of the “collapse” may have been related to these attacks. There is a reason for the huge explosion in the customs building, as well.


1) Calculate the correct size and the dimensions of suitable cutting charges and then order 24,000 pieces. Must also order fitting detonators (custom detonators had to be manufactured). Fitting detonators usually already exist in stores of military forces (as well as the CIA’s “Covert Labs”). Time of delivery is several months in any case. All detonators must be equipped with some kind of safety mechanism, which will be removed by a radio signal at the final moment.

2) After procurement, the cutting charges are installed in selected vacant rooms and elevator/maintenance shafts. Some of these rooms also served as temporary storages for charges needed elsewhere. After the charges are set, the office is renovated and circulated to the clients in the WTC. One man continuously assembles maybe 5 cutting charges per hour. With 10 assemblers 350 charges are assembled and installed a day. Maybe about 20 people more were needed (5 of them know what is going on, 15 do not). For the installation of the charges this operation takes at least four months with 30 men. Considering step 1), six months are probably needed. The amount of personnel could not have been increased, but probably decreased, if more time was available.

3) To some of the chosen office complexes, no one had access. That is why on the weekend on 9/8/2001 and 9/9/2001 it is announced, that floors up from the 40th floor are being equipped with new cables and no “normal employee” had access to the working area there. The installations of explosives are completed and at the same time (at least in the charged areas) listening devices are set to find out a possible premature discovery of the plan. If someone finds charges the guards are soon on the scene and will deal with the situation in one way or another.

4) One completes the area of secret service in WTC 7 so that its demolition operation can be carried out. A military flight beacon is placed there (planes are homing to it from far away). Remote controls for air planes and radio transmitters to be capable of blowing up at least one third of the cutting charges are placed. At this location, the ability to eavesdrop any area of the WTC, for example by a laser beam, aimed to a selected window, probably already existed.

5) A radio beacon helping the final approach is placed in targeted offices in the WTC towers. Close to these, remote controlled napalm explosives are placed as well, in order to draw the interest from the planes to fires. The higher in the towers the planes are targeted, the less death would result. (Real terrorists would do exactly the opposite.) Evacuation from lower floors should be possible through the staircases. The target is to create a new reason for odd wars and fascistic laws, not to kill as many Americans as possible. “A new Pearl Harbor”, meaning the death of about 3000 unsuspecting, innocent citizens is the desired loss of lives.

6) The attack plans are made so that they can be executed during the chaos, for example in the offices of the investigations of the economic crimes by the FBI. (The attackers had already placed or infiltrated their own men in these facilities.) Also in WTC 6 (customs) either a small nuke or a very strong bomb is also detonated (which one, depends on whether there was melted steel ponds in the cellar of WTC 6.) An explosion, of course, hides the loss of any supplies. (A nuclear explosion covers up murders, as well.)

7) In the morning of 9/11 the operations are performed after a timetable in which seconds are important. From the command post facilities the actions in towers are monitored. To hide the true nature of the operation, there was probably an agent on call in both towers, who could silence the people finding out too much. (The agent probably did not know what was going to happen.)

It is highly unlikely that the people who knew about the demolition charges in the WTC, or those who installed the remote controls of the aircraft or did some camouflage paintings for drones are still are alive and capable of telling about their acts, which changed the world.

8) The mini-nukes are transported to the basement floors in elevators. After that the elevators are locked down, guarded and monitored - no service repairman will be allowed near these elevators. The thermonuclear device used in WTC 7 was different, its yield was set lower and it was directed in a way better suitable for that building.

9) The explosions have been timed so that 99.9% of people around will look at the top of towers, and perhaps two seconds later the small thermonuclear bomb is exploded in the cellar of the south tower, and again two seconds later another very powerful charge in the WTC 6 customs building while nobody is looking that way. There are also the continuous explosions of the thousands of cutting charges tearing the south tower down to coincide with the speed of gravity-driven free fall.

10) The demolition of either of the WTC towers took at least half a year to prepare, including installation of 10,000 cutting charges and the delivery of a thermonuclear device at the last moment. The demolition of those ultra strong steel pillars in the central core using cutting charges only is not possible without waking up unwanted attention. These charges must be in touch with the steel pillars, and there is not enough enclosed space in the central core itself to hide these biggest possible charges.

11) The demolition operation is finished by destroying WTC 7 using a nuke and completely destroying the op center with its equipment. Concrete evidence like the military flight beacon and the remote control devices for cutting charges and napalm as well as the recordings of eavesdropping devices regarding events within the towers vaporize and vanish without a trace.

Most of the media is controlled by people related to the attack and tell misleading stories only, as if crushing of the airliners or a weak fire could have caused the “collapse” of the towers. The true attackers are the ones with strong and vigorous broadcasting around their false version of the events which is very different to what really happened.

No single “mainstream” newspaper, magazine nor any national TV channel in the western nations has taken a critical, questioning view on the so-called “official truth”, i.e. the planes collision and resulting fires caused the WTC towers to collapse. The destruction of WTC 7, which has no explanation at all (not hit by jets, or fiery debris), is bypassed totally and completely without any comments. A huge bomb of some sort, detonated in WTC 6 is also bypassed as a “non-existing event”.

Some things, like the sharply-drawn pictures of the closest seismographs may have been falsified. A Specialist in demolitions, V. Romero, may have been forced to change his original statement. The hoax is completed by Osama Bin Laden, who as a CIA agent “confesses” to have ordered the airliner strikes. The Bin Laden hoax and the suicidal Arabs construct a net of lies that fools the vast majority of mankind.

Laymen have no experience in observing differences in collapses, controlled demolitions and underground nuclear demolitions. Even the destruction of heavy steel constructions or typical fire damage are far away from their field of experience. These towers were built and professionally engineered to take the impacts of hitting Boeing 707's, comparable to Boeing 767's, taking into account the fires caused by the burning aviation fuel. In fact, the buildings did in fact survive all of that. They stood firm for nearly an hour, until they were demolished. (NYFD personnel are trained on the structural stabilities of the cities’ high rise buildings. If there was a clear and present danger of “collapse” it is unlikely the firemen would have been ordered into the building.)

The knowledge of relevant advances regarding weapon technology is even rarer. Many of those who are up to date are bound by strict commitment of loyalty and secrecy, that is strictly enforced. In some cases, they get executed for talking (an “accident” occurs).

The author of this text feels it is his duty to spread his advanced knowledge in explosives from a military point of view via public discussion as it is obvious that the public is lacking this information. The events observed around 9/11 cannot be rationally explained any other way.

The photographs attached in this non-profit distribution are for securing volatile, important evidence on 9/11 for discussion and education. Author hereby grants full permission to reproduce the drawing 'The Bombs in the WTC' and his writings. You are encouraged to mail, publish and mass produce these documents or your enhanced versions of them.

The Album Cover of “Party Music” by the aptly named punk rock band “The Coup”. Party Music CD Design was printed in July and was scheduled for release “after Labor Day” during the week of 9/11/01 - immediately the album was pulled from store shelves on 9/12. (Notice the “Covert Labs” (i.e. CIA Issue) detonator, Soviet “Red Star” or “Red Shield” (Rothschild) logo and the “location” of the explosive charges. Notice also the smug smirk on the bomber’s face. JUST A HARMLESS COINCIDENCE?? YOU DECIDE!)

CD Jacket of the Coup’s “Party Music”- Combined with the CD Graphics on the cover, and the two planes on the jacket - considering that this CD was recorded 6 months prior to 9/11/01 - WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CIA CODEWORDS “TELE TRIESTE” AND “ANGELICA 01”? Was this the “telefon” coding for the CIA “activation command” for certain “Manchurian Candidates”?

The Bombs in the WTC
(Schematic Provided by Anonymous “Insider”)
The Ground Zero here is in the original sense of the word, a nuclear blast site. The thermal energy may absorb heat at a rate of 10 E 23 ergs / cm2 sec and near the bomb all surfaces may heat to 4000 °C or 7200 °F igniting or vaporizing violently. Sources: US Department of Defense & US Department of Energy, Glasstone - Dolan: 'The Effects of Nuclear Weapons' (1980).

The thermonuclear bomb used was a “pure” hydrogen bomb; no uranium or plutonium was used at all. The basic nuclear reaction is Deuterium + Tritium > Alpha + n. The ignition of this is the tricky part, either a powerful beam array or antimatter detonator was likely used (a very certain way to get the necessary effect of directed energy in order not to level the adjacent blocks of high-rise buildings as well).
The Development of Bomb Technology Related to the 9/11 Operation
These outlines of developments in military bomb technology have been written to give the layman some idea, why bomb technology has developed into what it is.
A hollow charge: a small charge designed to make a hole in armor plate was invented in Switzerland in 1937. A cutting charge, used in the WTC in tens of thousands of pieces, was an evolutionary model of the principles of a hollow charge from 1950's.
A Claymore threw steel balls towards the enemy, but was otherwise harmless even from 5 meters distance, was developed in the USA approximately in 1960.
A flank mine is able to direct a narrow pressure wave through AFV flanks from a distance of 20 meters and was developed in Finland around 1970. Due to efficiency needs, a growing part of military explosives deploy improvements utilizing directed explosion energy.
By controlling several layers of the explosion fronts the size of a nuclear bomb has been minimized during the 1960's (fission forcing implosion). After that, the control of explosion force in nuclear explosions was developed. Too strong an explosion is sometimes unusable and undesirable, for example when the enemy have broken the front and advanced too close to friendly cities.
While looking for a bomb with a small size and a strong effect, a 100% pure hydrogen bomb was an obvious solution. When no atomic device is needed for igniting, the size of the hydrogen bomb gets even smaller and the yield (effect) can be set within a wide range, for example between from 1 to 100. This new technology was perfected in the 1980's, as well as the neutron bomb, which kills only living things while it leaves most inert material untouched.
The former Soviet Union is said to have had more than 500 command centers durable for repelling a small nuke attack. That led into the developing of different types of bunker buster explosives. A working solution the U.S. military developed is a nuclear missile that directs 96% of its yield into a thin, all penetrating heat+blast wave in a concentrated, specific direction, tunneling hundreds of meters downwards into and melting solid rock. This type of a hydrogen bomb was developed and perfected sometime in the early 1990's. Nowadays, both the yield and the direction of the destructive force of a small tactical hydrogen bomb can be somewhat controlled. The amount of fusion-able materials control the yield (effect) and the shape of the charge as well as the initiation arrangements impress the direction of the explosion wave.
Observations Suggesting the Use of Small Hydrogen Bombs
1) The concrete pulverized into fine dust, 70 - 300 micron particles (this alone would take massively more energy to produce than merely the total gravitational energy available from the earth’s gravitational field). "" \* MERGE FORMAT INET
2) Very energetic dust (radiating heat) after the explosions. (Demolition charges using thermite or other demolition explosives would produce white clouds of dust, which would not move much, and a gravity-driven collapse would produce much less and more coarse dust. Only a thermo-nuke would provide the kinetic energy to produce such “hot-to-the-touch” flour-fine dust particles.)
3) Variable brown shades of color was seen in the air - these “brown clouds” are typically produced by nuclear reactions of a thermonuclear device. The reactions use gamma radiation caused by free neutrons, N2, O2, H2O > nitrid acid, NO2, NO3 which in turn provide brown colored clouds after detonation. These clouds soon get their usual white color after some minutes as the heat and fast movement of the clouds cease.
Note: many of the pictures taken regarding the WTC Towers and the clouds seem to have been developed too artificially blue in color, replacing the shades of brown seen and remembered by eyewitnesses. (This may have been an attempt to suppress the evidence.) Also there was supposed to be 200,000+ gallons of water on the roof of each tower - this water was spilled into stairwells etc, but was later all converted into water vapor reducing the brown color.
4) Superheated steel objects, disintegrating into steel vapor. Molten ponds of steel were found in the elevator shafts. There were lots of burned cars in the parking areas of the towers. The fire department did not announce until 12/19/2001 that the fires under the WTC rubble have been extinguished (more than 3 months after the incident). "" \* MERGEFORMATINET

Thermal Survey of the WTC 9/16/2001 (NASA /US Geological Survey). Despite the fire department efforts to cool the rubble, molten metals would still be extremely hot (up to 1377 degrees F) in some sites 5 days after the incident. Burning jet fuel remnants (especially diesel fuel in Location A - Bldg. 7) would never be this “hot” after 5 days. However, thermo-nuke residue remains “hot” for many days.
Red-hot, semi-molten metal pulled from the base of WTC building 7 in late October, 6 full weeks after it collapsed, (no plane collided with it, and it was still standing unscathed hours after the twin towers had already collapsed).
WTC 7 on afternoon of 9-11-01. WTC 7 is the tall
sky-scraper in the back-ground, right. Seen from WTC 1 area. The “Shock and Awe” of the Nation over the towers’ collapse likely precluded rational questioning about WTC 7.

5) Elevated values of tritium were recorded in locations A-H, but not found anywhere else in New York. The University of California found elevated values on 9/13/2001 and 9/21/2001 but only within the boundaries of the WTC. They found the elevated levels of tritium “harmless” to human health. Again, in a pure hydrogen bomb isotopes of hydrogen are fused (D + T > n + a + 17.6 MeV).
6) An Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP-type) phenomenon blacked out GSM phones, cell phones, fax machines and rescue personnel’s radios at the exact moment when the first (southern) tower started to “fall down”, i.e. at the exact moment when a small thermonuclear bomb was detonated. This is why rescuing firefighters were not warned to evacuate -their radios had mysteriously quit working. A strangely eerie afterglow was seen in the late phase of the “collapse” of both of the towers. INCLUDEPICTURE "" \* MERGEFORMATINET
7) A wave of pressure was witnessed in the root or lower basement of the tower at the moment when the so-called collapse was beginning. The blast wave knocked over a photographer and a fireman close to the entrance, who was taking photos of the dust cloud. The burst of the dust cloud at the root of the tower was photographed as well. In the image on the left below is what probably was the explosion of WTC 6. The Customs building was deliberately exploded for some reason - it was not damaged because of the falling girders as they had not yet reached the roof of WTC 7 when the photo was taken. A couple of seconds later the clouds of the explosion were already partly above the roof of WTC 7, again, this was much too high-powered to be caused by typical blasting agents, including thermite - not to mention gravitational energy. This suggests it was the second hydrogen bomb in the WTC block. The first hydrogen bomb is discharging upwards (pulverized concrete) exactly as shown in the picture, and the steel structures vaporized by the bomb are already blowing out 100 meters (approx. 328 ft.) farther down. The massive cloud, caused by vaporized steel rising from the root and core of the building, is seen in the center of the picture and even more clearly in the picture at the right.
INCLUDEPICTURE "" \* MERGEFORMATINET "" \t "dusttrail.jpg" INCLUDEPICTURE "" \* MERGEFORMATINET) In the basement level, out of all the 47 ultra strong steel pillars, the steel was melted completely at the length of more than 20 meters (approx. 65 ft). Even cars were melted and burned in the basement level at “ground zero”. The pillars were far too thick for such massive pulverization via thermite, which some have suggested. An explosion of a thermonuclear bomb, on the other hand, explains the phenomenon well. (How is it even remotely possible for rational people to accept the “official story” that burning jet fuel in the upper portion of the tower melted steel columns and even cars in the basement level?)
9) Steel columns and pillars were ejected from the outer layers of the building. In the beginning of the so-called collapse, no such natural, gravitational-based energy exists that could throw steel pillars outwards from 60 to 175 meters (approx. from 170 to 574 ft.) away from the trunk of the building. Not even the most powerful cutting charges can do that. However, once again, a blast wave from a small hydrogen bomb is very capable of doing just that.
How the Towers of the World Trade Center collapsed
The airplanes did not affect the destruction of towers; they were needed instead to give the ruling neocons an excuse for instigating their odd Orwellian wars, while at the same time turning the USA into a police nation, much like the German Third Reich, to some extent. The towers took and withstood the impacts of crushing Boeing 767's. The towers were originally built and engineered to take impacts of Boeing 707's, which are approximately of the same size and were widely used in the 1970's.
Fires that burned from the fuel in the planes were too short-lasting and weak to be able to severely damage the structural integrity of the skyscrapers. Even in the most extreme situation, the heat from a kerosene fire cannot threaten the durability of a steel trunk. The temperature of carbon-based fires reach only 825 °C (approx. 1517 °F) in “ideal” enclosed furnace conditions, steel weakens at 800 °C (approx. 1470 °F) but does not actually become molten until a temperature of 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F) is reached. In the skyscrapers of the WTC the environment simply was not at all “ideal” as there were far too many steel columns which were purposefully engineered to channel heat away from the burning area. WTC 1 burned for 102 minutes and WTC 2 for 56 minutes only. A fire burning much longer, from 10 to 20 hours in a purely ideal environment could theoretically slowly increase the burning temperature to perhaps 1100 °C (approx. 2010 °F). But that is only if there is more fuel and gasses to burn; such a fire will damage concrete and irons, but not severely damage or “melt” heavy steel construction beams and girders. Again, a fire ignited by a finite amount of jet fuel would simply not “melt” steel columns.
For example, in mid-February in Madrid, Spain, the Windsor Tower (see above) burned for over 20 hours, which created a fire many times hotter and more destructive to metal than that in the WTC, but even the damage to the Windsor Tower caused by the very strong and long-enduring fire were comparatively minimal and limited to the upper floors - and of course, it did not melt the hotel’s steel girders. Like the Windsor Towers, if either of the WTC towers had started to collapse because of fires the collapse would have been limited to only a few of the floors and then stopped as the fire became contained.
The complete and total impossibility of a “gravitational collapse” is closer seen in other documents. A gravitational collapse would produce large pieces of rubble, and a non-symmetrical toppling of the structure. Furthermore, “gravitational collapse” simply does not explain the pulverization of fine dust from concrete, the vast amounts of micron-fine “powdered” dust that was hot to the touch, and pieces of steel ejected outwards over 500 feet.
Destruction of the towers by explosions is furthermore clear according to the photographs and reports of the eye witnesses. In the picture below, a range of cutting charges have just exploded in the down left sector and a typical white cloud is formed outwards from the wall. Down right, explosions are seen as well. Even a detonation flame is seen, many stories below the point of impact.
In video tapes taken of the planned demolition of the WTC, more explosions of these cutting charges can clearly be seen. The explosions advance quickly, with a gap of a couple of floors, cutting the strong steel pillars in the outer wall. The explosions are skillfully timed so that it appears that the tower collapses occur in the same timing as in a gravitational collapse. The explosions are not completely synchronized in timing, probably a few charges are triggered by radio, and other charges explode out of the impulses of one of these charges (infrared, pressure wave).
More challenging problems to the demolition men, however, were the reinforced steel central cores of the buildings and the 47 steel pillars more robust even than the ones on the outer rounds. The pillars of the central cores were made of steel 100 + 100 mm thick, much thicker than the side armors of a battle tank. Cutting those, even with explosives, is extremely difficult. One would need to surround the whole pillars, every single pillar on every floor blasted with powerful cutting charges. These charges would have needed to be placed in such a way that the inhabitants of the skyscrapers could not notice these preparations.
As seen in the following pictures, the cores of the towers were not destroyed by thousands of powerful cutting charges of thermite as were the surrounding beams, but rather by a modern thermonuclear explosive, a small hydrogen bomb. In the picture below, a hydrogen bomb explosion, the bomb having been placed in the lowest basement level and directed to the core, shows the resulting energy wave has reached the roof of the tower and the upper parts of the outer walls. On its way up, the waves of intense hydro-fire pressure partially penetrated about 100 floors of concrete and steel. Over ten million degrees of heat created by such a hydrogen bomb sublimated all water within the concrete in seconds. The water (or more specifically the Hydrogen content in the concrete) exploded extremely quickly into 24-fold volume which then totally pulverized the concrete and steel into a fine, white, and “hot” flour-like powder. All people, all office equipment and computers that were in the buildings immediately vaporized, turning instantly into heat and light. That is why almost no human remains of the nearly 3,000 victims and/or any recognizable office equipment residue was found in the ruins - yet thousands of offices were supposedly only “collapsed” from gravity. Where are the human remains of the victims??
Also, thermonuclear radiation via hydrogen is absorbed in steel so quickly that steel heats up immediately well over its melting point 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F) and also above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 °F). In the pictures shown below, super hot groups of steel pillars and columns, torn from their walls by the nuclear pressure wave, are instantly sublimated. They immediately turn into a vaporized form, binding heat is then released as quickly as possible. Upwardly blooming blast clouds (a mini mushroom), are clearly visible in the picture below. Clearly, this can not be possible for a mere gravitational collapse or even for cutting charges which are used for energy release horizontally.
Here you see the brown “energy cloud” of the explosion extending well over 63 meters in either direction of the 63 meter wide tower. This incredibly potent energy wave could not have been produced by a mere gravitational “collapse”.
Storax Sedan 104 Kt shallow underground hydrogen bomb (100 times larger than the WTC nuke but yet showing the same energy release characteristics).
In the upper picture the explosion is in theory 100 times stronger than in the picture below, but in practice the difference is only four times due to the “capability of direction” of the small hydrogen bomb along a prescribed “corridor” such as the base columns of the WTC Towers.
In the picture at the right, the brown shades caused by a hydrogen bomb are seen, while the top of the tower that is already collapsing is breaking down and the posture straightens up as the hydrogen bomb pulverized the core as it has lost all its resistance. The piles point the blasts of the cutting charges.

INCLUDEPICTURE "" \* MERGEFORMATINET Steel pillars are turned into dust.
Extremely hot, sublimating pieces are not created by too many demolition methods.For comparison, pictures of subterranean nuclear explosions where the explosion is blasting onto surface and into the air:
INCLUDEPICTURE "" \* MERGEFORMATINET INCLUDEPICTURE "" \* MERGEFORMATINET WTC 2Banberry 10 Kt underground Radioactivity released in the air creates shades of brown as the Electro-Magnetic Pulse knocks out all electrical devices within a specific, defined radius of the blast. (The subterranean nuke in the picture on the right is 10 times stronger than the small nuke on the left.) This is the primary reason why the FBI did not search the crime scene, and why the area was immediately cordoned off from the general public. Ground zeros of nuclear weapons are a public health risk and belong exclusively to the “experts” of FEMA.
Furthermore, normal fiery jet fuel conflagrations and planned demolitions do not remain extremely “hot” 5 to 10 days after the fires have been extinguished. However, hydrogen bomb sites remain thermally reactive and “hot” for days and even weeks. This is clearly demonstrated by the USGS calibrations of the WTC areas.
Images of the World Trade Center Site Show Thermal Hot Spots on September 16 and 23, 2001. (Downloaded directly from the USGS Website - with their commentary and explanation.)
Results of Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) remote sensing data and interpretations show the distribution and intensity of thermal hot spots in the area in and around the World Trade Center on September 16 and 23, 2001. Data collected on the 16th were processed, interpreted and released to emergency response teams on the 18th of September, 2001. The September 23 data were processed, interpreted and the results released on October 12, 2001. The images of the World Trade Center site show significant thermal hot spots on Sept. 16, 2001. By Sept. 23, 2001, most of the hot spots had cooled or the fires had been put out.
The AVIRIS instrument is a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) remote sensing instrument that measures upwelling spectral radiance in the visible through short-wavelength infrared. The instrument has 224 spectral channels (bands) with wavelengths from 0.37 to 2.5 microns (micrometers).
In response to requests from the EPA through the USGS, NASA flew AVIRIS on a De Havilland Twin Otter over lower Manhattan at mid-day on September 16 and 23, 2001. For these deployments, the Twin Otter was flown at altitudes of 6,500 and 12,500 feet. The spectral data for the maps shown here were measured at 6,500 feet and have a spatial resolution (pixel spacing) of approximately 6 feet (2 meters).
AVIRIS records the near-infrared signature of heat remotely. The accompanying maps are false color images that show the core affected area around the World Trade Center. Initial analysis of these data revealed a number of thermal hot spots on September 16 in the region where the buildings collapsed 5 days earlier. Analysis of the data indicates temperatures greater than 800oF. Over 3 dozen hot spots appear in the core zone. By September 23, only 4, or possibly 5, hot spots are apparent, with temperatures cooler than those on September 16 (Thermal Figure 1).

Thermal Figure 1. Hot spots show as orange and yellow areas. Dozens of hot spots are seen on September 16, but most had cooled or the fires had been put out by September 23.

The images (larger area shown below) also show vegetated areas as green. Water appears blue, and the smoke from the fires appears as a light blue haze. White and lighter blue areas are rooftops, roads, and concrete as well as dust and debris from the collapsed buildings. Dust, probably more than a millimeter thick, appears in shades of brown around the core WTC area on the 16th.
On the September 16th, 2001 image (Thermal Figure 2), large areas around the World Trade Centers show brownish colors, indicating the debris. On September 20, 2001 there was a significant rain storm that washed away some of the dusty debris. Reduction of the distribution of dust/debris is apparent in the September 23 image (Thermal Figure 3), and can be attributed to the cleanup effort along with the rain.
There are other red/orange spots that show in the images in the area south of the World Trade Center zone. These are hot spots from chimneys or heating exhaust vents and are normal and not other uncontrolled fires.
The AVIRIS data were processed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena California where the data are calibrated to radiance and corrected for aircraft yaw, pitch, and roll. Acquisition and calibration of AVIRIS data at JPL are under the direction of Robert O. Green. The data were then transmitted to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Imaging Spectroscopy Group in Denver, Colorado, under the direction of Dr. Roger N. Clark. Atmospheric and ground calibrations were applied to derive apparent surface reflectance and maps were then made of surface materials. The USGS imaging spectroscopy group includes Dr. Gregg Swayze, Eric Livo, and Todd Hoefen.

Thermal Figure 2. AVIRIS image from September 16, 2001. Hot spots show as orange and yellow areas. Yellow is hotter than red (because of color mixing in the way the 3-color image was produced).

Thermal Figure 3. AVIRIS image from September 23, 2001. Only a couple of hot spots remain in view.

Thermal Figure 4. Index for the locations of some of the hot spots observed on September 16, 2001.
Temperature of the Hot Spots
Remote measurement of the temperature is difficult because the source of the thermal emission can be less than the field of view of the measuring instrument. In that case a thermal sensor has an ambiguous solution: a hotter temperature of a smaller area or lower temperature of a larger area can result in the same total received thermal radiation.
A spectrometer, however, overcomes the ambiguity problem above, because the shape of the thermal spectrum can be used to derive a unique temperature, and the intensity gives the area of the emitting source. If a large enough spectral range is covered, a range of temperatures and the area of each can be derived. In the near infrared spectral range of AVIRIS, reflected solar radiation also contributes to the signal. The solution to the generalized problem involving all these effects is given in Clark (1979).
We derived temperatures using two methods: calibrated radiance, and derived reflectance following Clark's (1979) methods. In derived reflectance, thermal radiation is the Planck response divided by the solar spectrum. This has several effects: 1) the data are corrected for atmospheric absorption and scattering, 2) the reflected solar component can be readily assessed and compensated for, and 3) the ratio of the Black-Body response by the solar spectrum produces a very steep curve that is readily distinguishable from reflected sunlight and reflectance of surface materials.
Simple temperature derivation from derived reflectance is illustrated in Thermal Figure 5a and b. Here the hot spot is assumed to fill the pixel. The thermal response of hot spot A (from Thermal Figure 4) shows the AVIRIS response higher than the 800 kelvin curve. The 800 Kelvin temperature is a lower limit to the temperature. While the upper limit might be the 900 Kelvin curve, we see the slopes do not match. As temperatures increase, the peak in Black Body emission moves to shorter wavelengths and the slope of the curve decreases at positions on the short wavelength side of the peak (the case here).
Hot spot C (Thermal Figure 5b) shows similar effects. For hot spots covering the full area of the pixel, the temperature must be greater than 700 Kelvin. At about 1.3 microns, the model at 800 Kelvin matches the AVIRIS data, but the 800 Kelvin curve has a higher slope. This indicates the hot spot is smaller than the size of the pixel, but hotter than 800 Kelvin.
Solutions that include reflected solar radiation, hot spot temperature and hot spot area are shown in Thermal Figures 6a and b. Hot spot A, which from Thermal Figure 5 has a temperature greater than 800 Kelvin, is found to have a 1000 Kelvin temperature in a spot covering ~15% of a pixel, or 0.56 square meter. Similarly, hot spot C is found to have a 900 kelvin temperature over 20% of a pixel, or 0.8 square meter.
The sensitivity of the solution of area and temperature is illustrated in Thermal Figure 7. An excellent fit is obtained for hot spot C with a 900 Kelvin spot filling 20% of the pixel. At 1000 Kelvin, only 8% is required but the fit is noticeably worse. For temperatures in the 800-1000 Kelvin range, temperature accuracy is estimated to be ± 30 Kelvin and the area ± 5%. For smaller spots, like spot G in Table 1, the temperature accuracy is similar, but the accuracy on such small areas is approximately +5%, -0.5%. For example, decreasing the temperature to 1000 Kelvin (from 1020 Kelvin) on spot G increases the fractional area to about 5%.
Positions, temperatures and equivalent areas for hot spots A-H are given in Table 1 and the geometrically rectified location map is shown in Thermal Figure 8.

Thermal Figure 5a.

Thermal Figure 5b

Thermal Figure 6a
Thermal Figure 6b

Thermal Figure 7..."


I hereby submit OTHER quotations that can assist this Court in its deliberations; and I will urge the Court (after total summation) to hand down a sentence of 3000 years hard labor, plus 10 licks (with properly-constructed leather belts) per week for each culprit.

"...$2.3 trillion... [missing from Pentagon]" Rumsfeld (September 10, 2001)

" 'According to some estimate we [Pentagon] cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions...' Rumsfeld admitted..." CBS, 01/29/02

"...I was with you..." Donald 'The Great Rummy' Rumsfeld

Report by Federal Aviation Administration in Spring of 2001 stated interestingly that if: '...the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would be preferable..."

"...I would just mention that General [Richard] Myers and Paul Wolfowitz have been intimately involved in the work of the Department prior to September 11th, on September 11th and subsequent to September 11th..."
(Asserting clearly that he was not alone in the deal.)
"...How many countries would have joined - Any? Not likely...We would have heard objections to preemption similar to those voived before the coalition launched Operation Iraqi Freedom. We would have been asked, 'How could you attack Afghanistan when it was al Qaeda that attacked us; not the Taliban?' 'How can you go to war when countries in the region don't support you?' 'Won't launching such an invasion actually promote terrorist attacks against the United States?...'
"...Unfortunately history shows that it can take a tragedy like September 11 to waken the world to new threats and to the need for action...
During the course of the day the President indicated he expected us to provide him with robust options for military responses to that attack...
[Robust responses? Why so quickly?]
...A 90-nation coalition is a big thing!... [Attacks was a success]
...Someone asked me if Osama bin Laden is masterminding all of this...[Poor Osama! The Bogeyman]
...there were a number of reports about potential hijacking...
I didn't say we didn't know. I said I didn't know...
[Critical statement]
...we began the process quite quickly of making changes to the standing rules of engagement, Dick Myers and I did; and then issuing that..."
Testimony of Donald The Great Rummy Rumsfeld, to the Commission

People in the NMCC claimed that Rummy was absent for a while. He was with Miss Jamie - so where was he operating from 'quickly'?
Dick Myers was with the war veteran Senator Max Cleland; so when did he get time to be 'intimately' involved to change rules of engagement. He admitted that 'somebody' told him about the attacks after they occurred. A few ends are loose here!

"Nobody informed us of that [plane striking WTC 2]. But when we came out, that was obvious. Then, right at that time, somebody said the Pentagon had been hit." Dick Myers (This is damn casual talk from the Military Chief. Sorry Your Honor!)

"I don't know the answer to that question. I can get that for you, for the record...That order [to shoot down] to the best of my knowledge, was after the Pentagon was struck...I was with Senator Cleland when this happened." General Dick Myers (Confirmation Hearing, Senate Arms Services Committee) September 13, 2001

Senator Max Cleland corroborates: "General, it's a good thing that, as I look back at that morning, that you and I were meeting. It's a good thing we were meeting here and not us meeting in the pentagon because about the time you and I were having our visit, discussing the need to boost our conventional forces, to look at the question of terrorism and attacks on the United States, at just about that very moment, the pentagon was being hit." (Senate Confirmation Hearing) September 13, 2001

"At the time of the impact on the World Trade Center, we stood up our crisis action team. That was done immediately. So we stood it up. And we started talking to the federal agencies." General Dick Myers (Senate Confirmation Hearing, September 11, 2001

Senator Bill Nelson: "...if we knew that there was a general threat on terrorist activity, which we did; and we suddenly have two trade towers in New York being obviously hit by terrorist activity, of commercial airliners taken off course from Boston...then what happened to the response of the defense establishment once we saw the diversion of the aircraft headed west from Dulles turning around 180 degrees?...we would like an answer." Senate Confirmation hearing, September 11, 2001

Then, consider that Buzz Windrip (a.k.a.) Commander - lauded Dick Myers for his "...clear strategic thinking..."

"[I am going to]...kick some ass..." Poppy Junior (September 11, 2001)

"Make no mistake - the United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts..." George W. Bush (via American Forces Information Services, 9/11/2001)

However, soon after he said that he would hunt down and punish - he came up with this:
" I truly am not that concerned about him [bin Laden]" George Poppy Jr. Bush

"The goal has never been to get bin Laden." General Dick Myers
"Well, I think...I think...I think..." General Dick Myers (Testimony to the Commission)

"...We're at War...We must now finalize our strategy..." George J. Tenet

"It doesn't do any good to put up a combat air patrol if you don't give them instructions to act; if, in fact, they feel it's appropriate."
Head Dick Cheney (NBC's Meet The Press)

"[I ordered the team to]...pull it..." Larry Silverstein (WTC owner)
The term 'pull it' means one thing in the demolition 'bidness'; that is: detonate!

Silverstein: "I remember getting a call from the, er, Fire Department Commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it'...And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." (PBS, 2002)

Now imagine that a building is on fire and someone says, 'pull it'. He is not a magician - how does he expects the building to collapse, unless he knows that there are explosives professionally placed in it to bring it down?

"[Aide said]...plane is 10 miles out...Does the order still stand? And the Vice President whipped his neck around and said: 'Of course, the order still stands!..." Martin Y Mineta (Testimony to the Commission)

"...the missile to damage this [Pentagon] building and similar...that damaged the World Trade Center..." Donald The Great Rummy Rumsfeld (Via Parade, October 12, 2001)

"...terrorists shot down [Flight 93]..." Donald The Great Rummy Rumsfeld (While speaking in Iraq)
(Thought al Qaeda said that the Flight 93 passengers wrestled the hijackers and the plane crashed?)

"The law [9-11 Victims Compensation Act] gives me unbelievable discretion. It gives me discretion to do whatever I want. So I will!" Ken R. Feinberg, Grand Master

"...we were told that the World Trade center was gonna collapse." Rudolph 'Rudy' Giuliani (ABC news)

"We [FEMA] arrived on late Monday night, [September 10, 2001] and went into action on Tuesday morning."
Tom Kenney, FEMA (via interview with reporter.)
The 69000 question is this: What the hell was FEMA and bin Laden doing between September 10 and 11, 2001?

Was NORAD on spot? Hell yes!
"We were able to identify, track and escort suspected hijacked aircraft after the initial attacks...our reaction time outpaced the process in some instances." Major General Larry Arnold, NORAD

"...Let me tell you!...There will be another event..." The Great Rummy (Immediately before the Pentagon attack.)

Commission Hearing, Friday, May 23, 2003:
Colonel Alan Scott (Ret.)
"...Specifcally Operation Amalgan this exercise we used actual drone - NQM-107 drones, which are about the size of a cruise missile..."

Ben Veniste: " it fair to say that at least the NORAD personnel in Rome, New York, had information available to it in real time...?"

Lehman: "...I would also like to echo my colleagues' expression of great admiration for you and your predecessor..." [For what?]

Major General Arnold: "...We had just come out of a video teleconference with NORAD staff and with our folks at that particular time, when I was handed a note that we had a possible hijacking at Boston center..."

"A group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns." Newsweek, 09/24/01

"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11." Tony Blair

"...You know, this [the attacks] has bin Laden fingerprint all over it." George Tenet (09/11/01)
(How would Mr. George J. Tenet have such data on 9-11 when he and his Team did absolutely nothing to prevent the attacks. What did he know prior the attacks?)


No comments: